Maybe so, however as long as the guy making the decision is not banning you I guess some would say it's all good. I would suggest that social media as a public utility is a theory which argues that social networking sites (such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, Google Search and Twitter, etc.) are essential public services that should be regulated by the government, in a manner similar to the way electrical and phone utilities are typically government- ...I think this is the future of social media in this country.
do you mean like Democrats acting like pre schoolers by having paid people show up and try to disrupt his confirmation hearing?
I get your point, I have mixed feelings about this. However, if you can't get your message out on FB or Twitter how else can you in the current environment where they control the medium?
They already said they were a no vote the second he was nominated. They had more documents for Kavanaugh than any Supreme Court nominee in history. They weren’t trying to hide anything those documents were approved for release before Spartacus’ idiotic rant this morning.
read the OP. I don't care about him, I am dealing with the bigger picture of censure-ship.
You’re right facts are stubborn and the fact is the democrats have asked for more documents that are unrelated to his judicial philosophy. They asked for his wife’s emails. They asked for documents specifically related to policy discussions within the Bush White House. Those are covered under executive privilege. They are all no votes and have been since the second he was nominated. The fact is this is just political grandstanding for no damn reason. Kavanaugh is nothing but qualified to be on the Supreme court. The problem is that you idiots think he will literally kill women and kids. But please blame the gop for withholding documents even though they have handed over millions of pages from hundreds of thousands of documents
that's laughable Random. Yep, I read yesterday where the staff at Google gave 90% of their donations to the Democrats. I guarantee if you and other libs were being shut out you you wouldn't say that.The fact is this, people use social media forums today and if a business can't have access to them it hurts them. That is undeniable.
I agree but if they are going to have tos then they need to be applied equally. That’s the issue
Ha ha Raoul just trying to have a discussion. Like i said earlier I am not a fan of Alex Jones. I am focused on the bigger picture. Him today who is next? The problem with your suggestion is that the other forums are not well known. Here is a chart for you to consider.
