Why don’t Christian conservatives worry about climate change?

[extragreen]

When you don't have anything else to say just call somebody a "liar." Decent strategy.

If the shoe fits, wear it. Still waiting on those 10 necessary beliefs, liar.

 

[NutcaseConservative]

What's the reason behind posting with multiple names now? Hell, if I could have the post count of the names I had in the past I'd probably have 70,000. Duck Eggs, WVRedsFan, etc. Duck Eggs had a hell of a lot. Maybe 20 or 30k.

Waldo, I don't get you at all. Why do you still care about who I am irl? I'm not this dherd user you continue believe. Again, I'm sure you're actually a nice man irl and we could probably have nice civil conversations on our difference of opinions.

 

[NutcaseConservative]

No reluctance. It's only been discussed for about 3-4 days last week in multiple threads. Catch yourself up.

Ha, yes I was on vacation last week and try to avoid internet forums and political talk. Thanks anyway

 

[NutcaseConservative]

I wish I could answer that one for him, but I just can't think of a decent reason. The hag lost, so why not just own it. Six months is a hell of a long time to hide. I guess it would be different if people that post here really gave a shit about who one another is in real life, but to just be an anonymous person that feels they need to develop a new profile out of shame?... It seems it would be simpler to just pull the trigger and end it all.

I wish they wouldn't have banned my profile. I think I had around 10,000 with it. All I did was tell the moderator he was red on the head like a dick on a dog. Get a damn sense of humor, or GTFO.

I wasn't a fan of Hillary. For some reason you guys always equate not voting for Biff to meaning they must support "the hag".

On another note, why does a mod even bother banning you guys then? You just make another username and pick up right where you left off.

 

[NutcaseConservative]

Show me the science that breaks down what percentage of the increase is natural and what part is attributable to mankind.

Here's the thing, when dinosaurs roamed the earth CO2 levels were in the 7,000 ppm range based on scientific study. During the last ice age the levels were down around 100. Everyone is freaking out now with levels around 400 ppm. The simple fact is that CO2 levels and temperatures have varied greatly for millions, billions, of years. Man has only been around for thousands of years. If temperatures varied greatly before we were even on the planet, both up and down, it becomes apparent that we are not most likely the cause.

Here's the other thing. Not only have CO2 and temperatures fluctuated widely, they have done so based on fairly consistent macro trends and the current iteration of this pattern is not dissimilar to previous ones. I'll go find you a link to some graphs that show this.

I appreciate the article, especially as someone who majored in chemistry. I suppose my previous point was how do you decide what science to believe and what not to believe?

 

[Walden Pond]

Why do you still care about who I am irl?

I don't want to know who anybody is in real life.

Still, it's pretty pitiful that even in this fake life you had to run and hide for 6 months.

 

[MarshallManiac]

If the shoe fits, wear it. Still waiting on those 10 necessary beliefs, liar.

And I already posted them directly from the Scientology.org website. Go ahead...keep hoping that everybody will just get tired and stop posting so you can claim "I won." In reality, you never win...everybody else just has lives and refuses to go back and forth with somebody that thinks they can practice to contradictory religions.

 

[extragreen]

And I already posted them directly from the Scientology.org website. Go ahead...keep hoping that everybody will just get tired and stop posting so you can claim "I won." In reality, you never win...everybody else just has lives and refuses to go back and forth with somebody that thinks they can practice to contradictory religions.

No, you did not. Once again you're a liar.

 

[MarshallManiac]

No, you did not. Once again you're a liar.

(I swear my 4 year old nephew is more mature than you...oh and I did post point by point the items from scientology.org AND the scripture to show the contradictions. You conveniently ignored it.)

 

[extragreen]

(I swear my 4 year old nephew is more mature than you...oh and I did post point by point the items from scientology.org AND the scripture to show the contradictions. You conveniently ignored it.)

The subject, moron, was name the things a person must believe in order to be a scientologist. No one, including you have named one. So maybe you could use some help from that 4 year old.

 

[ohio herd]

the reason I am not worried is because it is not true

 

[MarshallManiac]

The subject, moron, was name the things a person must believe in order to be a scientologist. No one, including you have named one. So maybe you could use some help from that 4 year old.

Says the guy that says you don't have to believe the Scientology beliefs to be a scientologist. I swear you're brain dead.

 

[extragreen]

you don't have to believe the Scientology beliefs to be a scientologist.

You're getting close. Keep trying.

 

[19MU88]

Are you legally retarded?

it's a rare condition...ultra retarded