I'll give Spears a pass on this one, not a thumbs up or down. On the list of his high priority items, I would suspect he has been charged with #1 getting the finances in high gear, which ties directly to facilities, including the baseball stadium. I'd give him at least a couple of months to evaluate staff.
I am also sure he will be charged with making sure that Danny shows how he plans to run the program for the next year, making whatever changes are needed. I am sure that no one is more disappointed in the past year than Danny. He has been around basketball and Marshall to know that the current state of the program is unacceptable. I look to the portal for some action.
I'm trying to put my thoughts about this in proper form so bear with me folks if this seems a little all over the place.
I haven't even begun drinking yet.
Anyways...
Just reading Spears' resume from herdzone, a glaring theme emerges, its fundraising and donor base increases over anything else, and that's fine with a place like Pitt, who has plenty of wealthy alumni in a major city.
It really doesn't mention his involvement with the "sports" part, minus the bit about his time at NIU and their BCS Bowl, that's really it and that was a while ago.
It doesn't say he ever was a part of a hire of a HC or was the reason for a sports program at Pitt, to be successful.
To me, thats sort of a red flag.
Maybe it's the structure of Pitt's AD where that was all he needed to do, but will that work here?
Hamrick had a history of actually hiring people at various programs...hits and misses there, but also was part of the other areas of an AD...including fundraising and building facilities.
Spears seems to be just one part of a greater whole, which he has had tremendous success in.
What I'm saying is, is Spears someone that can fire someone and hire someone in the realm that benefits MU?
Considering how fickle the fanbase is, 1 loss in football and the Joan loses half the crowd to complete BS excuses.
Huntington isn't Pittsburgh. Money is there however, for MU's standards, but its not as easily flowing nor as abundant with economy/alumni.
MU fans see the collegiate athletics world much differently than the rest of the civilized world.
How is Spears going to be able to make a polarizing decision like keeping DD, and then go out and get alumni to increase donations, which is what he's known to do so well based on his resume.
I'm not sure if it's because our fans are in such a deprived state that they actually pay attention to their sports, or if their jobs are blue collar allowing them to take a moment to watch a game or get updates, etc., compared to Pittsburgh who has 10000x more to do and athletics are supported by money over results (common for mid pack P5's). In either case, it sounds like a tough sell and actual wins on the field count more for MU fans than some fancy new building.
At least that's my observation.
Also, I never really paid attention but Spears is listed as the former COO for Pitt Athletics.
Smith is the former CEO of Intuit.
I notice a pattern emerging...will it work here?