Wuhan lab - can request partnering labs to destroy files

[KyMUfan]

‘Explosive’ Legal Agreement With U.S. Lets Wuhan Lab Destroy Data

The Wuhan Institute of Virology has the right to ask a partnering lab in the U.S. to destroy all records of their work, according to a legal document obtained by U.S. Right to Know. The legal memo contradicts claims by Wuhan scientists that they would never destroy records.

childrenshealthdefense.org

 

[extragreen]

‘Explosive’ Legal Agreement With U.S. Lets Wuhan Lab Destroy Data

The Wuhan Institute of Virology has the right to ask a partnering lab in the U.S. to destroy all records of their work, according to a legal document obtained by U.S. Right to Know. The legal memo contradicts claims by Wuhan scientists that they would never destroy records.

childrenshealthdefense.org

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE​

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources.

 

[Rock98Dog]

How deep does your conviction to cover for the CCP run, comrade?

 

[i am herdman]

How deep does your conviction to cover for the CCP run, comrade?

When you have people in our govt that funded it and that are compromised by China this is what happens. They will do anything to cover it up ans stay in power

 

[extragreen]

How deep does your conviction to cover for the CCP run, comrade?

How deep does your conviction to believe in far right conspiracy theories run, dummkopf?

 

[extragreen]

When you have people in our govt that funded it and that are compromised by China this is what happens. They will do anything to cover it up ans stay in power

You're a lying idiot trumptard oath breaker.

 

[KyMUfan]

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE​

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources.

So, applying that definition wouldn't the original Lancet letter that you and so many others blindly follow in running cover for the CCP and it's cover-up qualify as "pseudoscience" then?

Covid origins probe: The Lancet does U-turn over lab leak theory

The Lancet, had in February last year, published an open letter that "strongly condemned conspiracy theories" surrounding the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin.

m.economictimes.com

 

[extragreen]

So, applying that definition wouldn't the original Lancet letter that you and so many others blindly follow in running cover for the CCP and it's cover-up qualify as "pseudoscience" then?

Covid origins probe: The Lancet does U-turn over lab leak theory

The Lancet, had in February last year, published an open letter that "strongly condemned conspiracy theories" surrounding the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin.

m.economictimes.com

• Overall, we rate the Economic Times Right-Center biased and Questionable based on numerous failed fact checks.

You're a liar and an idiot.

 

[KyMUfan]

• Overall, we rate the Economic Times Right-Center biased and Questionable based on numerous failed fact checks.

You're a liar and an idiot.

Hey idiot, the Lancet was the topic not the Economic Times. The Lancet published the pseudoscience a couple years ago and the Lancet is the one that did the U-turn against that pseudoscience. Being stupid isn't an act with you, is it???

 

[extragreen]

Hey idiot, the Lancet was the topic not the Economic Times. The Lancet published the pseudoscience a couple years ago and the Lancet is the one that did the U-turn against that pseudoscience. Being stupid isn't an act with you, is it???

You're showing your addiction to poor sources of your stupid drivel. Lying idiot.

 

[KyMUfan]

You're showing your addiction to poor sources of your stupid drivel. Lying idiot.

Unlike you, I didn't buy into the Lancet's stupid drivel...

 

[KyMUfan]

She ain't wrong...

 

[extragreen]

Unlike you, I didn't buy into the Lancet's stupid drivel...

You stupid lying punk. The Lancet is now saying the SAME thing I've been telling you....and that is that the origin of covid 19 is UNKNOWN.

 

[KyMUfan]

The Lancet is now saying the SAME thing I've been telling you.

After they summarily dismissed any origin other than naturally occurring which supplied time and cover, like you do, for the CCP to scrub and sanitize the evidence against it. Man, you really are that stupid...

 

[extragreen]

After they summarily dismissed any origin other than naturally occurring which supplied time and cover, like you do, for the CCP to scrub and sanitize the evidence against it. Man, you really are that stupid...

You stupid lying punk. The Lancet is now saying the SAME thing I've been telling you....and that is that the origin of covid 19 is UNKNOWN.

 

[KyMUfan]

You stupid lying punk. The Lancet is now saying the SAME thing I've been telling you....and that is that the origin of covid 19 is UNKNOWN.

More of your lies. Like the Lancet and Fauci, you originally bought into and promoted the naturally occurring theory that provided cover for the CCP...

Need proof?

Fauci: No scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab

In an exclusive interview, the face of America’s COVID-19 response cautions against the rush for states to reopen, and offers his tips for handling the pandemic's information deluge.

www.nationalgeographic.com

And? Why should anyone listen to you?
You're not listening to Fauci, the guy that knows a lot more than you.

 

[extragreen]

More of your lies. Like the Lancet and Fauci, you originally bought into and promoted the naturally occurring theory that provided cover for the CCP...

Need proof?

Fauci: No scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab

In an exclusive interview, the face of America’s COVID-19 response cautions against the rush for states to reopen, and offers his tips for handling the pandemic's information deluge.

www.nationalgeographic.com

You stupid lying punk. The Lancet is now saying the SAME thing I've been telling you....and that is that the origin of covid 19 is UNKNOWN.

 

[MichiganHerd]

You stupid lying punk.

Congratulations on coming up with a new line.

 

[extragreen]

Congratulations on coming up with a new line.

Congrats on your continued snotlicking. trumptard.