Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are going to send it back to lower court to determine what constitutes presidential orbit duties and what doesn’t. SCOTUS is going to punt.I don’t think the average person gets how important this ruling will be
I agreeThey are going to send it back to lower court to determine what constitutes presidential orbit duties and what doesn’t. SCOTUS is going to punt.
Pussies not doing their jobThey are going to send it back to lower court to determine what constitutes presidential orbit duties and what doesn’t. SCOTUS is going to punt.
Do you think Presidents should have full unqualified immunity?Pussies not doing their job
If this gets punted back to lower court, then it’s not going to happen before the election. Jack smith has never directly stated it but he wanted those trials before the election.Pussies not doing their job
No shit, wonder whyIf this gets punted back to lower court, then it’s not going to happen before the election. Jack smith has never directly stated it but he wanted those trials before the election.
Do you think Presidents should have full unqualified immunity?
The end goal of these cases is for them to be dismissed with no final decisions made on immunity.No shit, wonder why
What do pardons have to do with this?There is another side to this... I keep telling you to look at the big picture but you keep disappointing me...☹️
The President's power to pardon is broad, unchallengeable, and almost unlimited. Here are 25 of the most controversial pardons and commutations in history.
Some pardons have been particularly controversial, including one by former President George W. Bush that he took back the next day.www.businessinsider.com
You're a Godless lying trumptard oath breaker.He is a Democrat
What do pardons have to do with this?
You know presidents can’t pardon state crimes, right?Guess we'll just have to wait and see...
You know presidents can’t pardon state crimes, right?
The SC is doing nothing but delaying the trial for trump. Pitiful.I don't think the average person gets how full of shit Alito was yesterday. Absolutely, staggeringly full of shit lol.
The SC is doing nothing but delaying the trial for trump. Pitiful.
It's a shit show. We actually heard an argument that unless a law specifically says POTUS can't do it, it's cool. Like POTUS could walk into the White House Press Briefing Room, pull out an Uzi, spray the entire room of reporters, and it's cool because murder laws don't mention the President. Which would be kinda ironic as the room is named for James Brady.The SC is doing nothing but delaying the trial for trump. Pitiful.
This isn’t even a left wing smear. The specific example of a president ordering a hit on a political rival was brought up and Trump’s lawyers argued it isn’t illegal.It's a shit show. We actually heard an argument that unless a law specifically says POTUS can't do it, it's cool. Like POTUS could walk into the White House Press Briefing Room, pull out an Uzi, spray the entire room of reporters, and it's cool because murder laws don't mention the President. Which would be kinda ironic as the room is named for James Brady.
The only reason to even entertain such horsehit is delay.
The end result is dismissal.The SC is doing nothing but delaying the trial for trump. Pitiful.
That is how the impeachment process works.The argument being made is impeach first then prosecute
It's a shit show. We actually heard an argument that unless a law specifically says POTUS can't do it, it's cool. Like POTUS could walk into the White House Press Briefing Room, pull out an Uzi, spray the entire room of reporters, and it's cool because murder laws don't mention the President. Which would be kinda ironic as the room is named for James Brady.
The only reason to even entertain such horsehit is delay.
Trump was impeached and convicted? Yes the argument is impeach first and the president should have immunity because if not then the next guy could prosecute for anything like droning an American citizen without due processThat is how the impeachment process works.
I did not say, nor imply that he was convicted.Trump was impeached and convicted? Yes the argument is impeach first and the president should have immunity because if not then the next guy could prosecute for anything like droning an American citizen without due process
Absolute fact.The only reason to even entertain such horsehit is delay.
That argument is absolutely stupid.The argument being made is impeach first then prosecute
As it concerns his job, yes. If he robs a bank or shoots a kid at McDonalds, no.Do you think Presidents should have full unqualified immunity?
You're a lying idiot trumptard.It is certainly debatable if the election was completely up and up.