riflearm2 said:

I have an 11" pecker. I try to hide that from showing in my shorts so that I don't scare young children and cause flooding in their mother's shoes.

What I don't do is create bogus pictures of my male neighbor only having a 2" pecker and distribute those bogus images.

So tell me, what is worse: hiding something or fabricating something to hurt somebody else?

Click to expand...

Hiding that the POTUS is an invalid is objectively worse than making a shitty AI image.

riflearm2 said:

I have an 11" pecker. I try to hide that from showing in my shorts so that I don't scare young children and cause flooding in their mother's shoes.

What I don't do is create bogus pictures of my male neighbor only having a 2" pecker and distribute those bogus images.

So tell me, what is worse: hiding something or fabricating something to hurt somebody else?

Click to expand...

Well considering Mush Brain is the President and entire cabinet, leadership of a party, and his surrounding family told the American public he was ok and hid it, your scenario is not valid.

So, I don't think your busting on "deplorables" compares to an entire leadership of a party and government hiding the cognitive decline of a President. Then, rigging an entire primary election to anoint a woman who they think checks all the boxes is frankly 3rd world like.

i am herdman said:

How do you feel about entire administration hiding Mush Brain's cognitive issues?

Click to expand...

I have an 11" pecker. I try to hide that from showing in my shorts so that I don't scare young children and cause flooding in their mother's shoes.

What I don't do is create bogus pictures of my male neighbor only having a 2" pecker and distribute those bogus images.

So tell me, what is worse: hiding something or fabricating something to hurt somebody else?

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

riflearm2 said:

No way. Deplorables once again pushing bogus stories/images without doing due diligence? I'm shocked.

Click to expand...

How do you feel about entire administration hiding Mush Brain's cognitive issues?

RhinoD said:

I saw a story on this yesterday... How do they F that up so bad?.. You can't tell me the review official was so zoomed in on the guys foot that he couldn't see the ball come loose. And it shouldn't have been reviewed to begin with considering the official was in the correct position and less than 10 feet from the play.

We've all seen blown calls, even after review, but that was horrifically poor.

Click to expand...

The Sun Belt excuse was that the television footage that the reviewer was watching didn't show the ball being dropped. The footage that I posted was not a television broadcast camera.

Regardless, you have a ref just feet away with a great view. Why would you rely on a reviewer with limited views hundreds of miles away when a ref is sitting right there and can easily make that determination? I can understand if it was a difficult/close call. Refs should be willing to have that reviewed. But when it is that obvious of a call, the refs have to take precedence. Almost as bad, the review took about eight minutes of stoppage, and they still fvcked it up that much.

Does anybody even take them seriously anymore?

HerdandHokies said:

You’ll have to imagine it because the picture isn’t real. Look at the hands and faces. It’s a badly made AI image.

Click to expand...

No way. Deplorables once again pushing bogus stories/images without doing due diligence? I'm shocked.

I saw a story on this yesterday... How do they F that up so bad?.. You can't tell me the review official was so zoomed in on the guys foot that he couldn't see the ball come loose. And it shouldn't have been reviewed to begin with considering the official was in the correct position and less than 10 feet from the play.

We've all seen blown calls, even after review, but that was horrifically poor.

Chris McLaughlin said:

I feel like libs, pubs and everyone in between should come together on this to call out the hideously bad grammar on those shirts.

Imagine paying to get those printed. Holy hell.

Click to expand...

You’ll have to imagine it because the picture isn’t real. Look at the hands and faces. It’s a badly made AI image.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

ohio herd said:

Well the good thing is this, our next two games will definitely tell us all we need to know about how talented these guys really are.

Click to expand...

Yes and no.

If Stone continues to start and plays well then I doubt we'll see anyone else behind center.

What I do know is this......if we play 3 quarterbacks anytime soon (possibly for the remainder of the season) in one game then things have likely went REALLY bad for us.

BleedsGreen33 said:

That's just a garbage statement made by Huff. You mean when Earle came off the field he wasn't able to watch the tablets while the defense was on the field. What did the staff hold the information from him and only gave it to Braxton and Cole?

Click to expand...

Did you even listen to the statement Huff made? Clearly not, as he referenced the tablets. His entire point was that they allegedly didn't show the two coverages they had used the most and that Marshall had expected them to be in. So if most of your reps/game planning are against those two coverages and they aren't being used, it takes two or three series on offense to figure out what they are mostly running and how to adjust. In other words, Stone had to go in a bit blind and make adjustments while the other two QBs could stand on the sidelines and talk to a coach (and at halftime for adjustments) to go over what was being played, how that changes the routes the receivers should run, what the read progression should be, what plays should/shoudn't be called.

Good OCs purposely script their first one to three series with certain formations/plays so they can see how a defense will line up/adjust/defend it. For many OCs, the initial few series will be a feeling out period if they don't have a grasp on what a defense is doing. That also impacts the QB.

BleedsGreen33 said:

That's just a garbage statement made by Huff. You mean when Earle came off the field he wasn't able to watch the tablets while the defense was on the field. What did the staff hold the information from him and only gave it to Braxton and Cole?

Click to expand...

Huff said they were able to use the hour delay to go over what they were doing….that did give BB and Cole ample time….

That and the second half Stony Brook had nothing left. They were spent and had no depth.

To me, BB looked the best of the 3.

We’ll see this week how they look when the game will definitely be different

sluggo72 said:

Foresight was used however. We’ll see this season. Mark it down

Click to expand...

Cole has been here three years and has failed to beat out every scholarship QB we've had since he arrived. You have absolutely no factual evidence to base your theory on other than the other two are transfers. Which is complete garbage. You think Huff is just going to force his best QB to third string? I'm not a huge fan of Huff, but that is just stupid.

Also yes Cole threw a nice TD pass last week. I was thrilled to see him do that. However he did that late in the 4th quarter against a horrible FCS team with no depth. To say that TD proved anything is foolish. Braxton's two TDs were at least during meaningful snap and I yes one was to a wide open Fitzpatrick, but that was due to an ill timed corner blitz that Braxton picked up.

Cole was statistically one of the worst QBs last season with 6 INTs to 0 TDs.

I'd love for Cole to be our starter, but he has not earned that right. If he were anyone else you wouldn't even care. However his last name is Pennington so you assume he's like his dad.

Herdloyal said:

Cole and Braxton had the advantage of seeing the defense they were playing for almost 3 quarters.

Click to expand...

That's just a garbage statement made by Huff. You mean when Earle came off the field he wasn't able to watch the tablets while the defense was on the field. What did the staff hold the information from him and only gave it to Braxton and Cole?

Thunderiffic said:

I thought they all played well. But accuracy isn't really the concern. Split second decision making is what we need. Not having that is what leads to QB turnovers more than accuracy. I mean all those guys can put a ball through a tire. But in a game with defense coming at you, I felt like Earle, at least in this game, was more rigid and not as decisive, at least early on. He got better. Cole looked uncomfortable for a couple plays then shined. But long enough for me to think "Not this again." Braxton seemed like the one that came off the bench most ready to do the thing. I think he gives us the best chance of a quick start on offense. We have had slow starts for a long time on offense. I think we're lucky to have all three and if any goes down I feel like we'll still be okay for the first time in a long time.

Click to expand...

That is exactly what I saw too. Earle and Cole for that matter when they were going through their reads were snapping their heads around like they were rushing to the next guy. Braxton, save for his first throw, looked comfortable and his movement was much more fluid. The offense seemed to just run smoother with him in there.

I liked that he took shots down the field as well. That is what we need to keep that box light.

Chris McLaughlin said:

I feel like libs, pubs and everyone in between should come together on this to call out the hideously bad grammar on those shirts.

Imagine paying to get those printed. Holy hell.

Click to expand...

They're deplorables. Education, intelligence, and grammar aren't values they care about.

ohio herd said:

Well the good thing is this, our next two games will definitely tell us all we need to know about how talented these guys really are.

Click to expand...

Maybe VT will, but unless we stand toe-to-toe with tOSU, I won't take anything from it. I don't think we matchup well with them and I don't think we have the depth at DB to keep pace in the second half. Yes I know we beat ND, but that ND wasn't what they were thought to be and we had a much deeper team in then.

I don't think we'll really have a good read on this team until after WMU and App State.

Chris McLaughlin said:

I feel like libs, pubs and everyone in between should come together on this to call out the hideously bad grammar on those shirts.

Imagine paying to get those printed. Holy hell.

Click to expand...

But how is it different from the "McLaughlin's for Trump" shirt I saw you wearing?

Well the good thing is this, our next two games will definitely tell us all we need to know about how talented these guys really are.