VT did very little well against Vandy. They got manhandled on the offensive and defensive lines. Couldn’t stop the run and couldn’t run the ball. Either Vandy is way better than usual or VT is not as good as they thought.

Their complete rankings:

30CAT said:

As I already pointed out to your dumbass, there is definitely a difference, bleating liar.

Click to expand...

Were you replying to this "ignored user" or baldy?

i am herdman said:

Have you seen the Dem voters in big cities? Dumb and helpless.

Click to expand...

Dem sheep repeat empty rhetoric like good sheep depending on topic. Sometimes we the dumb uneducated racist sometimes we rich wealthy big business getting tax breaks...

It’s bad, but they could have just given them a 5th down.

Raoul Duke MU said:

Well, Trump does love the poorly educated.

Click to expand...

Have you seen the Dem voters in big cities? Dumb and helpless.

Raoul Duke MU said:

Well, Trump does love the poorly educated.

Click to expand...

Yes! Repeat the empty rhetoric like a good sheep. I will say, I love how you project confidence despite your crippling stupidity.

HerdandHokies said:

Particularly when you fill your days with screaming racial epithets at them, but if they had kept their traps shut they probably could’ve made a pretty interesting first amendment case and claimed it wasn’t an effort to get their neighbors to move, it was just their expression of (insert bullshit here.)

It’s a very interesting first amendment edge case.

Click to expand...

I don't know many overt racists that can keep their mouths shut.

HerdandHokies said:

You’ll have to imagine it because the picture isn’t real. Look at the hands and faces. It’s a badly made AI image.

Click to expand...

I read they are like second cousins. If you can't legally marry them in states not named Tennessee, they are family, otherwise no.

33-24 Herd

Raoul Duke MU said:

When the neighbors are black, it's kinda obvious what you are up to.

Click to expand...

Particularly when you fill your days with screaming racial epithets at them, but if they had kept their traps shut they probably could’ve made a pretty interesting first amendment case and claimed it wasn’t an effort to get their neighbors to move, it was just their expression of (insert bullshit here.)

It’s a very interesting first amendment edge case.

Chris McLaughlin said:

I feel like libs, pubs and everyone in between should come together on this to call out the hideously bad grammar on those shirts.

Imagine paying to get those printed. Holy hell.

Click to expand...

Well, Trump does love the poorly educated.

HerdandHokies said:

I’m surprised they were able to charge the guy who burned the cross on his own property using the FHA, but he was dumb enough to straight up admit that he was doing it to get them to move.

Click to expand...

When the neighbors are black, it's kinda obvious what you are up to.

Another clear indicator of the democrats' fear and desperation.

i am herdman said:

I believe someone has the right to burn a flag. I don't agree with everyone on everything.

Click to expand...

I also believe it is a right to burn the flag.

It's a strong statement. A strong nation isn't harmed by such actions.

45-10 VPI

Josh Stowers said:

Yes and no.

If Stone continues to start and plays well then I doubt we'll see anyone else behind center.

What I do know is this......if we play 3 quarterbacks anytime soon (possibly for the remainder of the season) in one game then things have likely went REALLY bad for us.

Click to expand...

Agreed. I can't stand this switching stuff and you're seeing it more and more often. Pick a guy and stick with him and if during the game you feel he's not getting it done and make the switch then stay with that switch going forward.

Marshall Jeff said:

Right around election time

Click to expand...

Here they come quickly. Imagine ****ing that. Just wait, here it comes.

Attorney General Merrick Garland confirmed during a separate press conference Wednesday afternoon that the FBI and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was on the scene gathering information about the incident.

i am herdman said:

Does anybody even take them seriously anymore?

Click to expand...

Yes, greed

riflearm2 said:

I have an 11" pecker. I try to hide that from showing in my shorts so that I don't scare young children and cause flooding in their mother's shoes.

What I don't do is create bogus pictures of my male neighbor only having a 2" pecker and distribute those bogus images.

So tell me, what is worse: hiding something or fabricating something to hurt somebody else?

Click to expand...

Hiding that the POTUS is an invalid is objectively worse than making a shitty AI image.

riflearm2 said:

I have an 11" pecker. I try to hide that from showing in my shorts so that I don't scare young children and cause flooding in their mother's shoes.

What I don't do is create bogus pictures of my male neighbor only having a 2" pecker and distribute those bogus images.

So tell me, what is worse: hiding something or fabricating something to hurt somebody else?

Click to expand...

Well considering Mush Brain is the President and entire cabinet, leadership of a party, and his surrounding family told the American public he was ok and hid it, your scenario is not valid.

So, I don't think your busting on "deplorables" compares to an entire leadership of a party and government hiding the cognitive decline of a President. Then, rigging an entire primary election to anoint a woman who they think checks all the boxes is frankly 3rd world like.

i am herdman said:

How do you feel about entire administration hiding Mush Brain's cognitive issues?

Click to expand...

I have an 11" pecker. I try to hide that from showing in my shorts so that I don't scare young children and cause flooding in their mother's shoes.

What I don't do is create bogus pictures of my male neighbor only having a 2" pecker and distribute those bogus images.

So tell me, what is worse: hiding something or fabricating something to hurt somebody else?

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

riflearm2 said:

No way. Deplorables once again pushing bogus stories/images without doing due diligence? I'm shocked.

Click to expand...

How do you feel about entire administration hiding Mush Brain's cognitive issues?

RhinoD said:

I saw a story on this yesterday... How do they F that up so bad?.. You can't tell me the review official was so zoomed in on the guys foot that he couldn't see the ball come loose. And it shouldn't have been reviewed to begin with considering the official was in the correct position and less than 10 feet from the play.

We've all seen blown calls, even after review, but that was horrifically poor.

Click to expand...

The Sun Belt excuse was that the television footage that the reviewer was watching didn't show the ball being dropped. The footage that I posted was not a television broadcast camera.

Regardless, you have a ref just feet away with a great view. Why would you rely on a reviewer with limited views hundreds of miles away when a ref is sitting right there and can easily make that determination? I can understand if it was a difficult/close call. Refs should be willing to have that reviewed. But when it is that obvious of a call, the refs have to take precedence. Almost as bad, the review took about eight minutes of stoppage, and they still fvcked it up that much.