Did any of you deplorables actually read the article?
If this was a bogus hit piece, why would the writer go out of his way to detail the inconsistencies and/or people who claimed the things from the other sources wasn't true? If the writer's goal was to create a hit piece, why even include those comments?
He did it, because that is what reporters do. They gather information and report what they discovered. If he has multiple people claiming one thing and multiple people claiming another, he reports both of them, as he should.
Do any of you actually think before drooling on your keyboard? An average intelligence person would look at all of the verifiable things and actions trump has done going back numerous decades. Then, that person would assess why there are so many of these stories coming out from people who were, at one time, close to him. That doesn't happen to innocent people over and over again from different people.