https://www.google.com/amp/s/theparadise.ng/joe-biden-added-zero-jobs-to-the-economy-in-2021/amp/
Worst president of our lifetimes.
Worst president of our lifetimes.
You're an idiot.https://www.google.com/amp/s/theparadise.ng/joe-biden-added-zero-jobs-to-the-economy-in-2021/amp/
Worst president of our lifetimes.
Cool. That means your orange jesus has a negative 17 MILLION jobs in his 4 years.People going back to work should never be included, but that's the bulk of what he claims.
That’s always YOUR argumentCool. That means your orange jesus has a negative 17 MILLION jobs in his 4 years.
Great insight. Care to address the substance of the article?You're an idiot.
We can use real stats or your stats. Either way Biden wins.That’s always YOUR argument
Lay it out the panel, pleaseWe can use real stats or your stats. Either way Biden wins.
There is no substance to the article.Great insight. Care to address the substance of the article?
You see, you have a chance to have open debate and dialogue and this is what you do. Why?covfefe
How about disputing the article instead of name calling.You're an idiot.
You see, you have a chance to have open debate and dialogue and this is what you do. Why?
Show us your side of the argument.
The article is absolutely stupid. But if you want to go with it, we will use your criteria. If we don't use the jobs "not created" by Biden, we then use the jobs "not created" under your orange jesus. Therefore we have Biden with a net negative 200,000 jobs and your orange jesus at negative 17 million jobs. Want some more disputing??How about disputing the article instead of name calling.
People going back to their jobs is not the same as jobs created.
He can’t. It’s not that he won’t. He literally can’t.You see, you have a chance to have open debate and dialogue and this is what you do. Why?
Show us your side of the argument.
It's not that I can't, I did.He can’t. It’s not that he won’t. He literally can’t.
All the people who returned to work under Biden were returning to jobs created by Trump.The article is absolutely stupid. But if you want to go with it, we will use your criteria. If we don't use the jobs "not created" by Biden, we then use the jobs "not created" under your orange jesus. Therefore we have Biden with a net negative 200,000 jobs and your orange jesus at negative 17 million jobs. Want some more disputing??
No, you do not get to count the jobs created after April 2020 twice.All the people who returned to work under Biden were returning to jobs created by Trump.
At the end of 2016 their were 123.76 million full time employees. At the end of 2019 there were 130.6 million. With the pandemic 2020 ended at 123.16. I’m not getting where you see 17 million lost jobs. What I see is that there were 7 million new jobs in Trump’s first three years and 15 million more that was wiped out by the China Flu.
42.3% Biden Approval average polling.. View Mush's 33% approval rating, which shows what Americans think of Joe. B's handling of EVERYTHING.
Idiot.Trust what's coming out of greed's keyboard, which, quite frankly, is pure hogwash. 'What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening'
Sorry but 538 is not something one should hang their hat on.42.3% Biden Approval average polling.
39.3 trump at same time of term
Idiot.
can you imagine how bad Bidens poll numbers would be if the media and social media folks didn't cover for him? Probably below 20%Sorry but 538 is not something one should hang their hat on.
33% is a more accurate number. That means, 67% disapprove of the moron.
Yes, because they are rated high for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information, a solid record with poll analysis, and a clean fact check record.Sorry but 538 is not something one should hang their hat on.
Nope. 44% is a more accurate number.33% is a more accurate number.
'What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening'can you imagine how bad Bidens poll numbers would be if the media and social media folks didn't cover for him? Probably below 20%
I'll agree with either way you want, but only for all presidents. Either way I win this discussion. Do you understand that? Just a simple yes or no will suffice.Extra you had an employee the government shuts down the economy, when the government allows you to reopen ayou hire that employee back. Is that a net gain of a job created. No name calling just a simple yes or no
?????I'll agree with either way you want, but only for all presidents. Either way I win this discussion. Do you understand that? Just a simple yes or no will suffice.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/Yes, because they are rated high for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information, a solid record with poll analysis, and a clean fact check record.
That^^^is a prediction. You understand the difference between a prediction and a fact?https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
2016 Electoral votes
Hillary Clinton
302.2
Donald Trump
235.0
Evan McMullin
0.8
Gary Johnson
0.0
Solid Record Actual Results: Trump 304, Hag 227
A prediction based on polling, doofus. You know, same polling as you claim your untrue 44% approval rating.That^^^is a prediction. You understand the difference between a prediction and a fact?
If for example some orange Jesus created 10 million jobs and then laid off 13 million, how many net jobs were created/lost??If I lost $1,000 dollars in the stock market yesterday.
Then today I make $1,000.
That is called a net gain of zero(o, nada, nothing)
So If Applebees lays off 500 employees two years ago(example) and they hire back 250. What is that?
My approval rating source is as good as yours. I chose the one I wanted and you chose the one you wanted. Idiot.A prediction based on polling, doofus. You know, same polling as you claim your untrue 44% approval rating.
Poll a bunch of woke liberals, and you get bad results.
Have you thanked me yet?