ADVERTISEMENT

cheeto's Twitter

Hey I bragged on a local pitcher once and rifle dug up dirt on the kids grandmother. She had spent like 16 months in prison on something she was a part of. I had forgot she had went to the pen. It had been awhile when rifle dug that up. Stalking is not hardly anything. Digging up dirt on a grandmother is pretty low so you all quit crying that rifle stalks you. That happened to be one of the most thought of people here. It had nothing to do with this kid's climb into the big leagues. He now is with AAA Pawtucket making nice money. He also can complete his college degree at UK Paid for by the Red Sox. You all better handle rifle with care
 
Congrats you stalked me on Facebook or whatever else you spend all day doing. What neighborhood do you think I grew up in?

I posted my response fourteen minutes after yours. So, I just happened to have been reading your post once you made it, then was able to "stalk" you, then was about to get all of that information and post it within fourteen minutes.

Damn, the NSA should be asking me for help . . . again.


for an independently wealthy playboy YAGS has tons of time to stalk multiple posters and type extremely long posts about foolishness on a message board

what a loser

That's what happens when you don't have to work another day in your life unlike you plebes. You can do whatever you want, for as long as you want, with whomever you want. I'd be jealous too.


I'm sorry. I missed the part of my post where I suggested going up and knocking on random doors to ask about cell service.

Oh. That's right. It's because I didn't.

Maybe you're the one with reading comprehension issues.

You said it's on the beach. You mean to tell me people don't go outside and enjoy the weather or scenery? I guess they just hole up in their ritzy condos and hide from outsiders.

It wasn't a reading comprehension issue, it was underestimating just how absurdly stupid you are.

So, now your plan is to have me go up to random people on the beach, ask if I can borrow their phone to take into my building, promise them I will be back in 15 minutes, and hope that works out?

Hey I bragged on a local pitcher once and rifle dug up dirt on the kids grandmother. She had spent like 16 months in prison on something she was a part of. I had forgot she had went to the pen. It had been awhile when rifle dug that up. Stalking is not hardly anything. Digging up dirt on a grandmother is pretty low so you all quit crying that rifle stalks you. That happened to be one of the most thought of people here. It had nothing to do with this kid's climb into the big leagues. He now is with AAA Pawtucket making nice money. He also can complete his college degree at UK Paid for by the Red Sox. You all better handle rifle with care

That's false.
 
I posted my response fourteen minutes after yours. So, I just happened to have been reading your post once you made it, then was able to "stalk" you, then was about to get all of that information and post it within fourteen minutes.

Damn, the NSA should be asking me for help . . . again.

.
I see you ignored my question. What neighborhood do you think I grew up in?
 
I see you ignored my question. What neighborhood do you think I grew up in?

That's irrelevant to this discussion. You grew up going to the best, wealthiest public school in Charlotte. It is one of the best high schools in the country. You spend most of your time at school as a student and spent most of your time around those wealthy neighborhood kids.

You claimed that I didn't know anything about you. I quickly proved you wrong. You should be used to it after more than a decade.
 
That's irrelevant to this discussion. You grew up going to the best, wealthiest public school in Charlotte. It is one of the best high schools in the country. You spend most of your time at school as a student and spent most of your time around those wealthy neighborhood kids.

You claimed that I didn't know anything about you. I quickly proved you wrong. You should be used to it after more than a decade.
I can guarantee you that me going to the wealthiest public school in charlotte has no bearing on who I hung out with. Some of them had money and a lot of it. However the vast majority of the people I spent most of my time with were not those people. Now if you know what neighborhood I lived in you would understand that you are wrong. You see in charlotte we have these things called magnet schools. You have to apply to go there. I applied and got in to the program at Myers park. I was bused to school. But please tell everyone how much you “know” about me and my upbringing mr Facebook stalker
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
It wasn't a reading comprehension issue, it was underestimating just how absurdly stupid you are.

So, now your plan is to have me go up to random people on the beach, ask if I can borrow their phone to take into my building, promise them I will be back in 15 minutes, and hope that works out?

It apparently is a comprehension issue. Nowhere in any of my posts did I say anything about borrowing someone else's phone. You're just making sh*t up.

So, during the first week you lived there, you never encountered or spoke to anyone in a commons area, pool, passed them sitting on their porch/patio? Is that what you're saying? If so, I call bullsh*t - which isn't unusual for an exchange with you because you're absolutely full of it.
 
I can guarantee you that me going to the wealthiest public school in charlotte has no bearing on who I hung out with.

As a higher schooler, you're in school for more hours than you are around others. Even if not participating in extracurricular activities, you're in school for about seven hours. By the time you travel to/from school, you're there more often than you're awake elsewhere. So, "hanging out" would include those you're around the most - the little rich kids at your rich high school.


I applied and got in to the program at Myers park.

Well, at least we know it wasn't based on intelligence.


But please tell everyone how much you “know” about me and my upbringing mr Facebook stalker

Wait: fever said it was linkedin because somebody kept trying to follow/add/whatever it is called on there. Now, you're saying it is Facebook. Maybe you guys should get together and talk about it. You'd probably get along well. Both of you grew up in very wealthy, very safe areas.
 
So, during the first week you lived there, you never encountered or spoke to anyone in a commons area, pool, passed them sitting on their porch/patio? Is that what you're saying? If so, I call bullsh*t - which isn't unusual for an exchange with you because you're absolutely full of it.

Let me explain my football schedule to you when the season is about to start:

seven days a week, 14 hour days (minimum). So, no, it wasn't common to see anyone in the common areas when I would be walking through at 11 pm at night or 6:30 am.

But lets say that I did. Are you expecting me to ask them to come up the elevator to my condo so that I can take their phone, go to one of my back bedrooms, and see if their service works? Brilliant once again!
 
Let me explain my football schedule to you when the season is about to start:

seven days a week, 14 hour days (minimum). So, no, it wasn't common to see anyone in the common areas when I would be walking through at 11 pm at night or 6:30 am.

But lets say that I did. Are you expecting me to ask them to come up the elevator to my condo so that I can take their phone, go to one of my back bedrooms, and see if their service works? Brilliant once again!

Let's try this again. Maybe if I type slower you'll understand.

YAGS - "Excuse me, neighbor. I see you live in the same building as me. How long have you lived here? I just moved in. Do you have a cell phone? What provider do you use? Do you get decent service throughout your unit? Is there another provider you know of that is better for this area/building? Thanks for your help. Let me buy you a beer sometime and/or sleep with your wife or daughter(s) as a means of repaying your kindness."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
As a higher schooler, you're in school for more hours than you are around others. Even if not participating in extracurricular activities, you're in school for about seven hours. By the time you travel to/from school, you're there more often than you're awake elsewhere. So, "hanging out" would include those you're around the most - the little rich kids at your rich high school.




Well, at least we know it wasn't based on intelligence.




Wait: fever said it was linkedin because somebody kept trying to follow/add/whatever it is called on there. Now, you're saying it is Facebook. Maybe you guys should get together and talk about it. You'd probably get along well. Both of you grew up in very wealthy, very safe areas.
I never claimed I didn’t hang out or socialize with those rich kids it just wasn’t the majority of the time like you claim Considering I was there I would know who I socialized with. You’re also wrong that the program wasn’t based on academics but please by all means continue assuming that you are intimately familiar with my upbringing.
 
but please by all means continue assuming that you are intimately familiar with my upbringing.

You started by saying that I knew "absolutely nothing" about your upbringing, but now you've changed to saying that I am not "intimately familiar" with your upbringing.

Soon, you will change to saying that I don't know how many days after your fourteenth birthday that you gave your first handjob.
 
Let's try this again. Maybe if I type slower you'll understand.

YAGS - "Excuse me, neighbor. I see you live in the same building as me. How long have you lived here? I just moved in. Do you have a cell phone? What provider do you use? Do you get decent service throughout your unit? Is there another provider you know of that is better for this area/building? Thanks for your help. Let me buy you a beer sometime and/or sleep with your wife or daughter(s) as a means of repaying your kindness."

You continue to prove that morons shouldn't talk about things they don't know. The building is not all designed the same floor by floor. For instance, my floor had my condo on the entire east side of the building and part of the south side of the building. The floor above me had two smaller condos on each end of that floor with a bigger condo in the middle of those on the east side. Other floors would be the opposite of those plans. So, hoping to randomly see somebody at 11 pm (which was nearly impossible, because you take an elevator from the underground garage straight to your floor) was already rare enough, let alone during a period in which few people were staying in the building. But assume I did; you'd want me to introduce myself after 11 pm to a stranger, start asking them questions, hope they were on the east side of the building instead of the other three, and hope they volunteer exactly where they live.

Should I wait two weeks before running into somebody during that time or three weeks? The property manager had already told me based on the material used in building the property and the different designs of each floor, certain cell providers wouldn't work in certain units, and he wasn't sure which worked where. But I'll ask 84 year old Edith who just happens to be out partying after 11 pm if she can have a ten minute conversation with a stranger and tell me where she lives.
 
5ac10afa68e3a.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
You started by saying that I knew "absolutely nothing" about your upbringing, but now you've changed to saying that I am not "intimately familiar" with your upbringing.

Soon, you will change to saying that I don't know how many days after your fourteenth birthday that you gave your first handjob.
Yeah because you’re a Facebook stalker. You found out a few details you’re not familiar with my upbringing but continue your social media search
 
While I’m not really sure why you couldn’t just find someone in the building to ask about the cell phone reception, I don’t understand why you didn’t just go to the property manager to figure it out as he has access to a lot of the people.
 
While I’m not really sure why you couldn’t just find someone in the building to ask about the cell phone reception, I don’t understand why you didn’t just go to the property manager to figure it out as he has access to a lot of the people.

You clearly didn't read the thread, as I have addressed both of those reasons numerous times.
 
I'm betting that's the only thing that he has IRL to brag about. Grammar nazis are the worst.

I'm not sure you have ever been right about anything on this board. Hell, you couldn't even find your own team's message board.

How about all of those celebrity liberals who have recently claimed that pedos are just normal people just like gays. Still hiding from that lie of yours?
 
I'm not sure you have ever been right about anything on this board. Hell, you couldn't even find your own team's message board.

How about all of those celebrity liberals who have recently claimed that pedos are just normal people just like gays. Still hiding from that lie of yours?

Did you read where the notorious RBG thinks the age of consent should be 12? Yikes! Good thing she isn't in a place to influence that, oh wait.
 
Did you read where the notorious RBG thinks the age of consent should be 12? Yikes! Good thing she isn't in a place to influence that, oh wait.

I get that this is a really shitty attempt to rile people up, but how about providing a quote from RBG where she says that the age of consent should be 12?
 

Hook, line, and sinker.

You really should go back to predicting that the world is going to end last September, because you look even dumber than that in this thread.

The quote you used from the book Ginsburg co-authored . . . yeah, that was a quote the two authors used while showing gender bias. The twelve year old consent issue was not Ginsburg's idea. She didn't support it. She didn't vote on it. It was part of a bill presented to Congress (which she wasn't a part of) that she, in no way, had anything to do with. The inclusion of that bill was in her book to show gender bias. She wasn't supporting the bill at all.

It would be no different than this: assume I posted on here that "abortion is great!" Then, assume you quoted it in response to it. A third person then claimed that you created and supported that stance simply by you quoting it to contest it. See how dumb that (and you) is?

But, hey, don't take my word for it:

https://www.quora.com/Has-Justice-Ginsburg-stated-that-the-age-of-consent-should-be-12

"In Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, Ginsburg uses an example of a bill that was in front of Congress. Ginsburg did not write the bill, she did not support the bill, she was not in Congress, and she had nothing to do with it. The bill said:"

Her quoting of the bill was solely to show the gender bias in the use of pronouns. It was illegal for men to do certain actions, but it wasn't illegal for women to do the same actions. There was no discussion on the topic of age of consent. She was focusing on the gender bias the bill presented to Congress had and recommended how it should be reworded.

Let me know if you need many more sources that mock the stupidity or morons who believe what you posted.

Reading comprehension. Try it, stupid.

 
Prove it.

This is the original paper that the person from the Eagle Forum cites in 1993 as an attempt to paint Ginsburg in a negative light. The link below is the first page in the section which contains the quote. You'll see that it's clearly discussing gender bias, and she only uses this particular bill because the of the gender neutral phrasing. She elaborates on that in the paragraph following the quote.

http://eppc.org/docLib/20050608_Ginsburg2.pdf#page=74


With that being said, I'll ask again...

How about providing a quote from RBG where she says that the age of consent should be 12?
 
Prove it.

Dear Stupid,

You're the one who said she supported it. The burden is on you to prove it.

If there is no record of her supporting it - which is the case - it is entirely fair to claim that she didn't support it, at least not by the means you claims she did.

Prove your absurdly dumb claim.
 
Dear Stupid,

You're the one who said she supported it. The burden is on you to prove it.

If there is no record of her supporting it - which is the case - it is entirely fair to claim that she didn't support it, at least not by the means you claims she did.

Prove your absurdly dumb claim.

I already got what I wanted out of this particular exchange.
 
This is the original paper that the person from the Eagle Forum cites in 1993 as an attempt to paint Ginsburg in a negative light. The link below is the first page in the section which contains the quote. You'll see that it's clearly discussing gender bias.

http://eppc.org/docLib/20050608_Ginsburg2.pdf#page=74


With that being said, I'll ask again...

How about providing a quote from RBG where she says that the age of consent should be 12?

Huh, would you look at that. I guess I was mistaken. You two are sharp as tacks.
 
Huh, would you look at that. I guess I was mistaken. You two are sharp as tacks.


Oh, so all of your absurdly stupid claims were actually just you acting and pretending to think those things. Got it.

So, when you predicted the world to end last September, it was an act? When you vehemently argued that liberal celebrities have made recent public comments that pedos were "just normal people" just like gays, you were acting?

Hint: you don't have to act to look stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ARandomHerdFan
I see you ignored my question. What neighborhood do you think I grew up in?
I used to live in Charlotte. I moved away before my kids would be in school. They would have been at Independence HS since I lived in the Lawyers Road area.
 
Oh, so all of your absurdly stupid claims were actually just you acting and pretending to think those things. Got it.

Nope, the RBG was a little project just for you. Thanks for you're compliance.

So, when you predicted the world to end last September, it was an act?

I never said the world was going to end. You simply cannot follow a narrative without a script.

When you vehemently argued :rolleyes: that liberal celebrities have made recent public comments that pedos were "just normal people" just like gays, you were acting?

I told you then, I saw it somewhere on twitter or FB months and months ago. IDGAF whether you believe me or not.
 
Nope, the RBG was a little project just for you. Thanks for you're compliance.

* your. God, you're a moron.


I told you then, I saw it somewhere on twitter or FB months and months ago. IDGAF whether you believe me or not.

Well if you saw it on Facebook, then it has to be true.

You said there were more than one. So, you saw more than one liberal celebrities state this, yet you can't remember who any of them were? Strangely, such controversial statements by celebrities were never reported on by other media? That's amazing.

You're a moron.
 
Your just too much fun.

Oh, uh huh. I bet you did that first one on purpose.

Why are you on the Marshall board? Nobody from either side of the political spectrum gives you any credit. You've been exposed as a kook and dumb. Why don't you stay on the wvu board? We have enough of our own uneducated idiots to deal with without you adding to it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT