ADVERTISEMENT

DeSantis Murdering Biden Among Independents

It dont because red necks here always vote Republican and this is a totally red state . I get nothing for my vote only if it would count in total votes instead of the outdated and insane electoral college. If I lived in one of the purple states it might matter.
So what you are saying is that you don't want someone who does not think like you to chose the President? It's a good thing we have the electoral college to prevent large states from running the Union.
 
They are represented by their state you clueless moron.
They are NOT represented by their state, you lying govt stolen tax money mooch. An electoral vote for a republican president does not represent me. It represents the majority of the voters in a state.
 
But they have more people. Why do thry only get two?
Irrelevant. Senators are elected by popular vote. Furthermore, you stupid lying oath breaker, you're a hypocrite when defending the electoral college while supporting and defending a president that attempted to overturn the results of a free and fair election, and the results of valid electoral college. HYPOCRITE.
 
They are NOT represented by their state, you lying govt stolen tax money mooch. An electoral vote for a republican president does not represent me. It represents the majority of the voters in a state.
So popular vote of that state right?
 
Oldie and EG are to stubborn or dense to realize that would screw WV or other small states. The big states would decide the executive branch every time. They could collude with each other and there would never be a need for the exectutive to be an executive for all the people. We give the bigger states more representation in the House based on populaton. The Senate evens it out with same number of Senators. WV gets two and California gets two. California gets more electoral votes than WV

All they see is D and R. They don't look at the big picture. Nebraska and WV have as much right for the executive to be their President as does California and Texas.

Frankly, the electoral college is one of the most genius and beuatiful things are founders did. We have to have the states collectively represented. A congolomerate, unified in certain matters. We don't need the President of California or New York or Texas or Florida. They are the executive of all the people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
Oldie and EG are to stubborn or dense to realize that would screw WV or other small states. The big states would decide the executive branch every time. They could collude with each other and there would never be a need for the exectutive to be an executive for all the people. We give the bigger states more representation in the House based on populaton. The Senate evens it out with same number of Senators. WV gets two and California gets two. California gets more electoral votes than WV

All they see is D and R. They don't look at the big picture. Nebraska and WV have as much right for the executive to be their President as does California and Texas.

Frankly, the electoral college is one of the most genius and beuatiful things are founders did. We have to have the states collectively represented. A congolomerate, unified in certain matters. We don't need the President of California or New York or Texas or Florida. They are the executive of all the people.
Texas and Florida are red states
 
Here is the thing if enough states vote for the candidate that you like then they win. The candidate has to win the popular vote in that state to win the nomination it is the fairest system we have. Just because a State like TX or CA has more population does not mean that they get to chose what’s best for WV
 
  • Like
Reactions: i am herdman
NO you let them be selected by people who should never have been in office. Every vote for president should count the same.
So, you want California and another big state or two to decide every presidential race becaue they have more people. They get more electoral votes.
 
So, you want California and another big state or two to decide every presidential race becaue they have more people. They get more electoral votes.
Whoever gets the most votes overall from the USA should be president and none of this electoral college where even when someone loses they try to steal the election at counting of the electoral votes by state. Does that ring a bell?
 
Whoever gets the most votes overall from the USA should be president and none of this electoral college where even when someone loses they try to steal the election at counting of the electoral votes by state. Does that ring a bell?
No, it doesn't.

Think about what you are saying. You would have an executive that 2 or 3 states could almost hand pick every time, whether they be a D or a R. They would probably not even end up being a D or R but, a pawn for those 2 or 3 states. They could veto any legislation outside of those 2 or 3 states. They could funnel immense amounts of money and power to those two or 3 states. Natural disaster hits your state? Sorry, we need that money in these two or three states.

it would literally, at some point, bust the union of states apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVUSerg
No, it doesn't.

Think about what you are saying. You would have an executive that 2 or 3 states could almost hand pick every time, whether they be a D or a R. They would probably not even end up being a D or R but, a pawn for those 2 or 3 states. They could veto any legislation outside of those 2 or 3 states. They could funnel immense amounts of money and power to those two or 3 states. Natural disaster hits your state? Sorry, we need that money in these two or three states.

it would literally, at some point, bust the union of states apart.
This is what they want. They really want a dictatorship. For all the hand wringing about Trump/dictator........it's plain to see they just want THEIR dictator ruling them. They love the political class ruling their daily lives.
 
Here is the thing if enough states vote for the candidate that you like then they win. The candidate has to win the popular vote in that state to win the nomination it is the fairest system we have. Just because a State like TX or CA has more population does not mean that they get to chose what’s best for WV
Each person should have an equal say in the government of the country. People from Wyoming shouldn’t have more of a say simply because they live in a state with far fewer people.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mlblack16.
This is what they want. They really want a dictatorship. For all the hand wringing about Trump/dictator........it's plain to see they just want THEIR dictator ruling them. They love the political class ruling their daily lives.
I am starting to think they do.

Yes, master, we will comply. Yes, master, feed me. Yes, master, take care of me. Yes, master, I am not worthy and you are my leader.
 
Each person should have an equal say in the government of the country. People from Wyoming shouldn’t have more of a say simply because they live in a state with far fewer people.
They don't. You live in California. you have more electoral votes than Wyoming. You have reps in the House. How would you say Wyoming hs more of say than California does?
 
They don't. You live in California. you have more electoral votes than Wyoming. You have reps in the House. How would you say Wyoming hs more of say than California does?
Primarily the senate. But also, each elector from CA represents 700,000 people. Each one from Wyoming represents 200,000 people. Their vote counts 3.5 times as much as someone from CA.
 
No, it doesn't.

Think about what you are saying. You would have an executive that 2 or 3 states could almost hand pick every time, whether they be a D or a R. They would probably not even end up being a D or R but, a pawn for those 2 or 3 states. They could veto any legislation outside of those 2 or 3 states. They could funnel immense amounts of money and power to those two or 3 states. Natural disaster hits your state? Sorry, we need that money in these two or three states.

it would literally, at some point, bust the union of states apart.
NO why dont you just admit it. The republicans would have to change how they govern or they could never win the presidency again.
 
Whoever gets the most votes overall from the USA should be president and none of this electoral college where even when someone loses they try to steal the election at counting of the electoral votes by state. Does that ring a bell?
You are the biggest liar on here (sorry Greed). You only have this point of view because it currently benefits you. If the tables were turned, you'd scream if anyone dared to change the system to what you're suggesting.

You're just morally bankrupt and cannot be truthful with yourself, let alone us.
 
You are the biggest liar on here (sorry Greed). You only have this point of view because it currently benefits you. If the tables were turned, you'd scream if anyone dared to change the system to what you're suggesting.

You're just morally bankrupt and cannot be truthful with yourself, let alone us.
You are wrong. If the majority of republicans win the presidency so be it. But the electoral college is a joke and should be abolished. Soon I believe it wont matter anyway as the south is going more and more democratic and that would change the whole thing.
 
Primarily the senate. But also, each elector from CA represents 700,000 people. Each one from Wyoming represents 200,000 people. Their vote counts 3.5 times as much as someone from CA.
There's a reason for that. We became a collection of states. It gives representation to all states. If not, why join together?
 
You are wrong. If the majority of republicans win the presidency so be it. But the electoral college is a joke and should be abolished. Soon I believe it wont matter anyway as the south is going more and more democratic and that would change the whole thing.
At one time the entire south was vastly Democrat.
 
There's a reason for that. We became a collection of states. It gives representation to all states. If not, why join together?
I understand how the system works and why it was originally set up that way. I just don’t think that system of government makes sense anymore and would prefer a much more federalist government system.

And I’m well aware that that would mean CA would have much less power to do things that I generally like.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT