ADVERTISEMENT

Dherdbucky leaving the board for another 6 months

ThunderCat98 said:
I'd call $10 million a year and no Congressional oversight "unlimited."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...er-russia-investigation-cost-trump/index.html

https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/special-counsel-russia-probe-gets-separate-funding-path

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.po.../12/trump-budget-mueller-investigation-404587
Click to expand...
No it’s not. I am still waiting for your data showing unlimited. If your going to spout off a bunch of shit be prepared for folks to call you out as nonsensical when you are.
 
HerdBuckeye said:
No it’s not.
Click to expand...

It absolutely is, particularly in the context of what a typical investigation/prosecution costs. Also, keep in mind, they have merely budgeted for $10 million. That doesn't mean that's all they can have. It means that's all that was contemplated in appropriating spending for the next year. Again, there is no Congressional approval or oversight. All they have to do is get their finances approved through a DAG. It was the same with Kenneth Starr and any other Special Counsel. They have access to an "indefinite" funding account.
 
Conspiracy Example 3: Cuntry and his retarded uncle enter into an agreement to cut timber in a National Forest. They go out, cut some wood and are caught by an LEO. Guess what they are charged with? That's right - conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. 371. Same as Manafort.

Libs and the media keep throwing out the "conspiracy against the U.S." thing b/c it sounds worse, and morons like Cuntry bite on it. 371 is a general, catch-all conspiracy to violate ANY federal law that doesn't already have its own conspiracy provision (like money laundering, drug trafficking, and about 100 others do).
 
  • Like
Reactions: WV-FAN
$10 MILLION IS A CHEAP PRICE TO PAY FOR FREEDOM.
$10 MILLION IS A BARGAIN TO WEED OUT THE TRAITORS IN OUR GOVERNMENT.
THE DEFENSE BUDGET IS $750 BILLION, SO $10 MILLION IS A BARGAIN TO SAVE AMERICA FROM RUSSIA
& TOTOLATARIANISM.
 
ThunderCat98 said:
It absolutely is, particularly in the context of what a typical investigation/prosecution costs. Also, keep in mind, they have merely budgeted for $10 million. That doesn't mean that's all they can have. It means that's all that was contemplated in appropriating spending for the next year. Again, there is no Congressional approval or oversight. All they have to do is get their finances approved through a DAG. It was the same with Kenneth Starr and any other Special Counsel. They have access to an "indefinite" funding account.
Click to expand...
I will hold you accountable again. Where do you find he has unlimited funds? The starr investigation cost anywhere from $40- $80 million 20 years ago. What is that in today’s dollars $80-$120 million. Seems like Mueller is doing a great job managing the expenses.
 
Where did I say he spent too much money? My point is, he has had time and resources and hasn't come up with sh*t.

Fwiw, Starr's investigation was a tremendous waste of money and resources as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
ThunderCat98 said:
Where did I say he spent too much money? My point is, he has had time and resources and hasn't come up with sh*t.

Fwiw, Starr's investigation was a tremendous waste of money and resources as well.
Click to expand...
How long do you think it should take to read millions of emails text and documents. Interview dozens if not hundreds of witnesses scattered all over the world etc. You have no idea what he has found so far. He could have incredibly damning info on people in the administration, associated with the campaign etc. I don’t think mueller is in this to drag this out. Doesn’t he report regularly to Rosenstein?? Obviously Rosenstein is supportive of moving forward.
 
ThunderCat98 said:
Conspiracy Example 3: Cuntry and his retarded uncle enter into an agreement to cut timber in a National Forest. They go out, cut some wood and are caught by an LEO. Guess what they are charged with? That's right - conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. 371. Same as Manafort.

Libs and the media keep throwing out the "conspiracy against the U.S." thing b/c it sounds worse, and morons like Cuntry bite on it. 371 is a general, catch-all conspiracy to violate ANY federal law that doesn't already have its own conspiracy provision (like money laundering, drug trafficking, and about 100 others do).
Click to expand...

It's still Conspiracy Against the United States of America. It sounds exactly how it is supposed to sound. Words have meaning and they chose those words for that crime. You think that's no big deal? How patriotic of you.
Count Two - Conspiracy to Launder Money
Count Ten - Unregistered Agent of a Foreign Principal
Count Eleven - False and Misleading FARA Statements

So an indictment including 12 felony counts is no big deal? You're an idiot.
 
HerdBuckeye said:
How long do you think it should take to read millions of emails text and documents. Interview dozens if not hundreds of witnesses scattered all over the world etc. You have no idea what he has found so far. He could have incredibly damning info on people in the administration, associated with the campaign etc. I don’t think mueller is in this to drag this out. Doesn’t he report regularly to Rosenstein?? Obviously Rosenstein is supportive of moving forward.
Click to expand...

Actually, it is very impressive he came to the conclusions on Manafort and Gates in just 5 months. 12 felony counts, including money laundering from overseas bank accounts, etc.
 
ThunderCat98 said:
Conspiracy Example 3: Cuntry and his retarded uncle enter into an agreement to cut timber in a National Forest. They go out, cut some wood and are caught by an LEO. Guess what they are charged with? That's right - conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. 371. Same as Manafort.

Libs and the media keep throwing out the "conspiracy against the U.S." thing b/c it sounds worse, and morons like Cuntry bite on it. 371 is a general, catch-all conspiracy to violate ANY federal law that doesn't already have its own conspiracy provision (like money laundering, drug trafficking, and about 100 others do).
Click to expand...

You obviously do not practice law....not criminal law.
 
countryroads89 said:
How did he do that if he was just appointed on May 17, 2017?
Click to expand...
you do know that the FBI had a case against manafort spanning back over a decade. For some reason the case was never prosecuted but that doesn't mean the leg work wasn't already done. Surely you're not that dense and can't figure that out.
 
herdfan429 said:
you do know that the FBI had a case against manafort spanning back over a decade. For some reason the case was never prosecuted but that doesn't mean the leg work wasn't already done. Surely you're not that dense and can't figure that out.
Click to expand...

So trump picked a guy to be his campaign manager who had a FBI case against him dating back a decade ago?

Thanks!
 
countryroads89 said:
It's still Conspiracy Against the United States of America. It sounds exactly how it is supposed to sound. Words have meaning and they chose those words for that crime. You think that's no big deal? How patriotic of you.
Count Two - Conspiracy to Launder Money
Count Ten - Unregistered Agent of a Foreign Principal
Count Eleven - False and Misleading FARA Statements

So an indictment including 12 felony counts is no big deal? You're an idiot.
Click to expand...

Proof you can't reason with stupid^^^
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
countryroads89 said:
So trump picked a guy to be his campaign manager who had a FBI case against him dating back a decade ago?
!
Click to expand...

Manafort didn’t plead out either. Probably knows there was no case then....and there is no case now. Political witch hunt.

Remember when you guys were telling us Manafort was going to turn over evidence on Trump? Bahahahaha
 
  • Like
Reactions: WV-FAN
herdfan429 said:
you do know that the FBI had a case against manafort spanning back over a decade. For some reason the case was never prosecuted but that doesn't mean the leg work wasn't already done. Surely you're not that dense and can't figure that out.
Click to expand...
Good stuff trumptard. Trump picked a guy to run his campaign that was under a 10 year investigation by the FBI. Thanks for clarifying.
 
raleighherdfan said:
Manafort didn’t plead out either. Probably knows there was no case then....and there is no case now. Political witch hunt.

Remember when you guys were telling us Manafort was going to turn over evidence on Trump? Bahahahaha
Click to expand...
Is your ITT Tech daughter on the defense team. I hear they have a solid law school.
 
HerdBuckeye said:
Good stuff trumptard. Trump picked a guy to run his campaign that was under a 10 year investigation by the FBI. Thanks for clarifying.
Click to expand...
Once again I didn’t vote for trump and have never once said he made smart hiring decisions
 
Y.A.G Si Ye Nots said:
Raleigh, I didn't know your daughter went to ITT Tech. What is she studying?
Click to expand...

I didn’t know they did either. I thought ITT was for adults. My kids are elementary school age. (But let’s not keep talking about kids...bucky has shown he seems to enjoy talking about someone else’s little kids in weird ways....you trying to go there too?)

Your buddy bucky most likely remembering his own ITT experience trying to get a real estate sales correspondence course through them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Marine03 said:
Kind of like Trump fooling you all with promises of locking up Hillary Clinton and forcing Mexico to pay for a wall?
Click to expand...
With the military down there with secret orders to shoot to kill and remember don't led old people as much when they are running. Mexico is starting to pay dearly now. They will build the wall just to get the military out of there.
 
sistersville said:
With the military down there with secret orders to shoot to kill and remember don't led old people as much when they are running. Mexico is starting to pay dearly now. They will build the wall just to get the military out of there.
Click to expand...

lol are you serious?
 
herdfan429 said:
you do know that the FBI had a case against manafort spanning back over a decade. For some reason the case was never prosecuted but that doesn't mean the leg work wasn't already done. Surely you're not that dense and can't figure that out.
Click to expand...

uh, yes, yes he is that dense.
 
raleighherdfan said:
I didn’t know they did either. I thought ITT was for adults. My kids are elementary school age. (But let’s not keep talking about kids...bucky has shown he seems to enjoy talking about someone else’s little kids in weird ways....you trying to go there too?)

Your buddy bucky most likely remembering his own ITT experience trying to get a real estate sales correspondence course through them.
Click to expand...

It's nothing to be ashamed of. I'm sure it came down to Carnegie-Mellon, MIT, Stanford, and ITT.
 
Most states that set the age of consent at 16 still have a 5-year window. Meaning if she's 16 and you're over 21, it's still a crime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SamSwimmer

Trump Advisors - Ukraine Deal Finna Be A Couple Months

Replies
5
Views
329
Pullman Square - Non Sports Talk
extragreen
extragreen
extragreen

Another Trump nominee withdraws from consideration

Replies
0
Views
522
Pullman Square - Non Sports Talk
extragreen
extragreen
R

Destroying the Board

Replies
25
Views
1K
Pullman Square - Non Sports Talk
riflearm2
R
SamSwimmer

The democrat Party Down Bad

Replies
5
Views
281
Pullman Square - Non Sports Talk
extragreen
extragreen
BleedsGreen33

According to the USM Board

Replies
75
Views
4K
Old Fairfield - Premium Forum
rvntx
R
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back