ADVERTISEMENT

Every State has a right to self defense in absence of the federal governments inaction or dereliction of duty. Texas was promised that.

i am herdman

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Mar 5, 2006
84,867
31,523
113
The Constitution clearly says that when there is inaction by the federal govt every state has a right to defend itself. Texas, when admitted to the union, was promised that by the United States of America. The feds, under the absence of Mush Brain's leadership, has neglected the border and they are not acting in good faith to help solve the problem. Texas, and the United States of America, is clearly being invaded. This is a national security issue. The federal administration is not performing their constitutional duty.

Texas has every right to defend itself. So does West Virginia or Oregon or North Dakota.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT and WVUSerg
The Constitution clearly says that when there is inaction by the federal govt every state has a right to defend itself. Texas, when admitted to the union, was promised that by the United States of America. The feds, under the absence of Mush Brain's leadership, has neglected the border and they are not acting in good faith to help solve the problem. Texas, and the United States of America, is clearly being invaded. This is a national security issue. The federal administration is not performing their constitutional duty.

Texas has every right to defend itself. So does West Virginia or Oregon or North Dakota.
It speaks volumes that he can't name how Texas is ignoring the constitution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
The Constitution clearly says that when there is inaction by the federal govt every state has a right to defend itself
Where does is clearly say that????

Because there is in FACT this contained in the Constitution...

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
 
Where does is clearly say that????

Because there is in FACT this contained in the Constitution...

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Are you an idiot? If Russia invaded Alaska and the federal government did not respond do you not think Alaska would have right to protect itself? States have a National Guard under the leadership of a governor unless Federline. Some states have a separate State Guard.

It is in Article 10.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 30CAT
Are you an idiot? If Russia invaded Alaska and the federal government did not respond do you not think Alaska would have right to protect itself? States have a National Guard under the leadership of a governor unless Federline. Some states have a separate State Guard.

It is in Article 10.
extradumbass routinely refuses to accept facts, if they're negative toward the pedophile he supports.

Such a shame.
 
It is NOT.
You're a liar, and idiot, and oath breaking trumptard.
States have an absolute right to defend themselves. Hell it is there. Especially if the feds are not goingto do their duty. Article 4. It mentions the federal government not protecting the states. And, Article 1.

Biden is not doing his job. The federal govt has broken its sacred trust and good faith with the states. Plural.
 
Last edited:
States have an absolute right to defend themselves. Hell it is there. Especially if the feds are not goingto do their duty. Article 4. It mentions the federal government not protecting the states. And, Article 1.

Biden is not doing his job.
You're a lying idiot. It's not in those parts of the constitution either. You stupid trumptard liar
 
If Greg Abbott has such a problem with Biden, he should walk his ass into the White House and . . .
 
If Greg Abbott has such a problem with Pedo-Joe, he should walk his ass into the White House and . . .

Reminds me of when Pedo-Joe told paraplegic, Chuck Graham, to stand up.

Such idiocy and...
 
90

covfefe...
 
I'll stick with the Constitution. You stupid trumptard oath breaker.
Then stick with it, dumbass, respect and recognize the states' rights under the Constitution....

The State Self-Defense Clause in Article I, Section 10 provides that a State may defend itself when it has been “actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay,” and the State does not need the consent of Congress to do so. The Invasion Clause in Article IV, Section 4 provides that “[t]he United States … shall protect each [state in this union] against invasion.” These clauses provide dual protection against invasion broadly defined. This includes defending against actions by “foreign hostility [and] ambitious or vindictive enterprises of [a state’s] more powerful neighbors.” This encompasses defense against hostile non-state actors such as cartels and gangs operating at the border and entering into Arizona’s territory. James Madison specifically cited Virginia using its militia to stop smugglers as an example of a valid exercise of the invasion power, and there is every basis to conclude this sovereign power was retained as reflected in the State Self-Defense Clause. The Import-Export Clause in Article I, Section 10 also recognizes that States retain sovereign authority to execute inspection laws, which requires operational control of the border to channel entry of goods to authorized ports of entry. This is an aspect of the historical police power that is expressly preserved for the States. In sum, both the power of self-defense against being “actually invaded” and the power to “execut[e] [their] inspection laws” are sovereign powers that were retained by the States under the U.S. Constitution to permit States to control on-the-ground conditions at their borders that are essential to public safety and security in a State.
 
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
 
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
The National Guard is not housing troops. They are not engaged in war..but they are being invaded.

Do your job feds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Where does is clearly say that????

Because there is in FACT this contained in the Constitution...

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
But the federal government is not doing their job according to the constitution. They are in no way protecting the border.
 
It's NOT there, oath breaking trumptard.

Article IV, § 4, which promises that the federal government “shall protect each [State] against invasion,” and Article I, § 10, Clause 3, which acknowledges “the States' sovereign interest in protecting their borders.

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Stop being a damned dumbass, dumbass.
 
It's NOT there, oath breaking trumptard.
Absolutely is. Again if Russia invaded Alaska and the feds did nothing do you think Alaska should sit there and do nothing? Thr one place in Texas that is the center.od attention is a state park.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Absolutely is. Again if Russia invaded Alaska and the feds did nothing do you think Alaska should sit there and do nothing?
He knows that he is wrong but he will continue to spout the Democrat talking points.

It won't be long until he will say Republicans don't want the border closed so that they can run on it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 30CAT
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT