I googled you one.One thing I do know is, basing a running game on QB draw isn’t going to cut it
Tri-State Eye Care
I googled you one.One thing I do know is, basing a running game on QB draw isn’t going to cut it
The other 2 have peaked, Cole just scratching the surfaceOk maybe as a capable back up.
The other 2 have peaked, Cole just scratching the surface
did you go to the game? have you read the backgrounds on the retreads? SMHWhat could you possibly be basing this comment on?
did you go to the game? have you read the backgrounds on the retreads? SMH
There was a defense out there? Who knewCole and Braxton had the advantage of seeing the defense they were playing for almost 3 quarters.
So you saw what I saw the retreads have peaked while Cole has upsideWell, I have only missed 3 home games since ‘96, never left a game early, and consistently attend practices in which most do not.
I’ve seen each of the 3 QB’s take more reps than 95% (maybe more) of fans so yeah I feel like I have finger on the pulse of things.
I also understand that some stories are never going to be told no matter how badly some want to be able to tell them.
So you saw what I saw the retreads have peaked while Cole has upside
I’d be interested to see what would happen if they started Cole on Saturday. I think the other 2 would run to the portalYou can say you think Cole has improved, although I’m not sure you can make that assumption based off anything you’ve seen so far, but to say anything else is simply grasping for straws.
I’d be interested to see what would happen if they started Cole on Saturday. I think the other 2 would run to the portal
Well let me just say I’ve seen this movie at MU before, it didn’t end wellThey very well may but I don’t know what that has to do with anything.
Cole wasn’t the starter last year for a reason.
He’s not the starter (or backup) this year for a reason.
Even if he had more potential than the other two, we need to win now. I’m not worried about what could be. I’m worried about what is.
Well let me just say I’ve seen this movie at MU before, it didn’t end well
The first 2 don’t have skin in the game
Emotional based please. I remember 1982 when the coach kept the best QB on the bench for 6 gamesSee, your opinion is emotionally based which is never a good thing.
I don’t care about skin in the game. I care about what’s best for the program no differently than the staff.
I’d suggest everyone else doing the same.
Emotional based please. I remember 1982 when the coach kept the best QB on the bench for 6 games
I would think that using Sonny as an example doesn't make your point. Sonny was a bad coach and an even worse offensive minded coach. He played favorites with a lot of players and ran off some good players for no reason at all. His 39-69-1 record at Marshall proves he wasn't a good coach. Sure Huff has made mistakes, but he is a better/smarter coach than Sonny at this point.Emotional based please. I remember 1982 when the coach kept the best QB on the bench for 6 games
JS - if you didn’t leave that Cincinnati game a few years back, my hats off to you.Well, I have only missed 3 home games since ‘96, never left a game early, and consistently attend practices in which most do not.
I’ve seen each of the 3 QB’s take more reps than 95% (maybe more) of fans so yeah I feel like I have finger on the pulse of things.
I also understand that some stories are never going to be told no matter how badly some want to be able to tell them.
Foresight was used however. We’ll see this season. Mark it downHindsight is always 20/20.
JS - if you didn’t leave that Cincinnati game a few years back, my hats off to you.
That is exactly what I saw too. Earle and Cole for that matter when they were going through their reads were snapping their heads around like they were rushing to the next guy. Braxton, save for his first throw, looked comfortable and his movement was much more fluid. The offense seemed to just run smoother with him in there.I thought they all played well. But accuracy isn't really the concern. Split second decision making is what we need. Not having that is what leads to QB turnovers more than accuracy. I mean all those guys can put a ball through a tire. But in a game with defense coming at you, I felt like Earle, at least in this game, was more rigid and not as decisive, at least early on. He got better. Cole looked uncomfortable for a couple plays then shined. But long enough for me to think "Not this again." Braxton seemed like the one that came off the bench most ready to do the thing. I think he gives us the best chance of a quick start on offense. We have had slow starts for a long time on offense. I think we're lucky to have all three and if any goes down I feel like we'll still be okay for the first time in a long time.
That's just a garbage statement made by Huff. You mean when Earle came off the field he wasn't able to watch the tablets while the defense was on the field. What did the staff hold the information from him and only gave it to Braxton and Cole?Cole and Braxton had the advantage of seeing the defense they were playing for almost 3 quarters.
Cole has been here three years and has failed to beat out every scholarship QB we've had since he arrived. You have absolutely no factual evidence to base your theory on other than the other two are transfers. Which is complete garbage. You think Huff is just going to force his best QB to third string? I'm not a huge fan of Huff, but that is just stupid.Foresight was used however. We’ll see this season. Mark it down
Huff said they were able to use the hour delay to go over what they were doing….that did give BB and Cole ample time….That's just a garbage statement made by Huff. You mean when Earle came off the field he wasn't able to watch the tablets while the defense was on the field. What did the staff hold the information from him and only gave it to Braxton and Cole?
Did you even listen to the statement Huff made? Clearly not, as he referenced the tablets. His entire point was that they allegedly didn't show the two coverages they had used the most and that Marshall had expected them to be in. So if most of your reps/game planning are against those two coverages and they aren't being used, it takes two or three series on offense to figure out what they are mostly running and how to adjust. In other words, Stone had to go in a bit blind and make adjustments while the other two QBs could stand on the sidelines and talk to a coach (and at halftime for adjustments) to go over what was being played, how that changes the routes the receivers should run, what the read progression should be, what plays should/shoudn't be called.That's just a garbage statement made by Huff. You mean when Earle came off the field he wasn't able to watch the tablets while the defense was on the field. What did the staff hold the information from him and only gave it to Braxton and Cole?