Yes. It was technically a good shoot but it was awful judgement. Still not murder though.
the main take away is the over charge was done by another idiot democrat prosecutor
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. It was technically a good shoot but it was awful judgement. Still not murder though.
I never agreed with it. Don't lie!
watch the whole tape and be objective. murder is an over charge by the DA.
the main take away is the over charge was done by another idiot democrat prosecutor
watch the whole tape and be objective. murder is an over charge by the DA.
If it were a family member it would be an emotional based decision like yours is.Like the rest of us, I watched the video. Murder is absolutely the correct charge. With malice aforethought. The officer acted to cause great bodily harm with a reckless and indifference to human life. Why? Because eight fvcking minutes and no attempt to render aid.
Think of this way: if I applied a rear naked choke to someone, they went unresponsive and eventually stopped breathing, but I held that hold for eight fvcking minutes, what would you call that? If I did that to one of your family members, what charge would you think appropriate?
No, the poster, as crazy it as it might be, at least wrote something with a few sentences.When you claim something as stupid as that post had substance, you agree with it. idiot
No, the poster, as crazy it as it might be, at least wrote something with a few sentences.
Like the rest of us, I watched the video. Murder is absolutely the correct charge. With malice aforethought. The officer acted to cause great bodily harm with a reckless and indifference to human life. Why? Because eight fvcking minutes and no attempt to render aid.
Think of this way: if I applied a rear naked choke to someone, they went unresponsive and eventually stopped breathing, but I held that hold for eight fvcking minutes, what would you call that? If I did that to one of your family members, what charge would you think appropriate?
One just popped up...Chris deleted a thread on Old Fairfield from Herdloyal that was...um...interesting.
Chris deleted a thread on Old Fairfield from Herdloyal that was...um...interesting.
One just popped up...
If it were a family member it would be an emotional based decision like yours is.
Everyone agrees the knee on neck was excessive.
fentanyl intoxication, recent meth use, heart disease
Chris deleted a thread on Old Fairfield from Herdloyal that was...um...interesting.
Not really. I'd choke the shit out of someone to win a fight if I had to.* It's how long he held the knee on the neck that was excessive.
* I brought this up with some friends when people were saying "ban all choke holds". Bullshit. A choke is one of your best weapons if a fight goes to the ground. You just can't choke someone to death, that's the difference.
Going to burn shit down and riot. Again. There is no way you can charge them with murder like they are...well, I guess you can but, it is the wrong charge.
Mark your words that experts are predicting that?Experts are predicting a trial and jury verdict just before November 3rd.
Mark. My. Words.
Thank you Counselor!
however, the choking or time of knee on the neck is irrelevant with regard to your comments as he was already subdued and cuffed and on the ground.
You're welcome, dipshit.
Do you not know what "in general" means?
Oh yeah, never mind, you are a dipshit so probably not.
How long should an officer place a knee on a detained, grounded and cuffed persons neck?
i lol'dFor you? About eight minutes.