ADVERTISEMENT

Herd Fever, Anti Whites, and Liberals

Rifle, never saw you miss a point so badly, but I figure you're not really missing it, you just feel like arguing.

I didn't miss it. It's just another example of you not knowing how to comprehend what you read and raleigh not knowing how to write.

Here is what he originally wrote and what I called him out on:


"later earning 2 masters degrees from both Maryland and MIT."

Raleigh wrote that fiorina earned two master's from both Maryland and MIT. that would total four degrees. She earned a degree from both Maryland and MIT.

This isn't a case of ambiguous writing. It is a case of inaccurate writing.

If you want to to slow it down and see the difference:

"Alex Rodriguez hit two home runs at both Yankee stadium and turner field last week." That would mean four home runs.

"Alex Rodriguez hit a home run at both Yankee stadium and Turner field last week." That would mean two home runs.
 
Last edited:
I didn't miss it. It's just another example of you not knowing how to comprehend what you read and raleigh not knowing how to write.

Here is what he originally wrote and what I called him out on:


"later earning 2 masters degrees from both Maryland and MIT."

Raleigh wrote that fiorina earned two master's from both Maryland and MIT. that would total four degrees. She earned a degree from both Maryland and MIT.

This isn't a case of ambiguous writing. It is a case of inaccurate writing.

If you want to to slow it down and see the difference:

"Alex Rodrigues hit two home runs at both Yankee stadium and turner field last week." That would mean four home runs.

"Alex Rodrigues hit a home run at both Yankee stadium and Turner field last week." That would mean two home runs.


And I also said at the beginning of the that specific post that I was typing on a mobile phone and trying to make it short............(By the way, does Carly have more higher education credentials than Hillary????)

Nevertheless, it is interesting (and sort of sad) when Rifle is reduced to debating a sentence structure typed on mobile phone. Maybe I should have "called him out on" his previous post where he failed to start each sentence with a capital letter prior to my rebuttal of it??

Its also troubling that Rifle doesn't seem to understand that banker isn't commenting on that specific sentence, as much as he is commenting on Rifle's total whiff on the thread as a whole. Between his experience with Taz, and his ignorant inquiry last week about why parents of female child, (whom he doesn't know), wouldn't turn their kid over to him to go backstage....I'm starting to wonder if his hanging out with the blue hairs may be encouraging some early onset dementia.
 
Nevertheless, it is interesting (and sort of sad) when Rifle is reduced to debating a sentence structure typed on mobile phone. .

It's sad that you think that is the only inaccuracy I have called you out on.

If your error had just been due to typing on a mobile device, you would have noticed it again after I called you out on the error and when you tried providing proof that your statement was correct.

After being called out on the quote, you would have blamed it on typing on a mobile device (how, I don't know, as it wasn't a typo or anything) instead of trying to argue that your statement was correct.


Its also troubling that Rifle doesn't seem to understand that banker isn't commenting on that specific sentence, as much as he is commenting on Rifle's total whiff on the thread as a whole.

Anyone who has followed the thread knows that isn't the truth. You made two criticisms against Hillary which were exactly like two republican candidates you didn't call out for the same exact thing. I called you out for being a hypocrite and the opposite of fair and balanced. Only at that point did you attempt to bring other aspects into the equation to try and help your initial failure of an argument.

, and his ignorant inquiry last week about why parents of female child, (whom he doesn't know), wouldn't turn their kid over to him to go backstage.....

In that situation, when you have both local and park police assuring a parent they will be with their child the entire 10 minutes, it takes a special kind of helicopter parent to not allow it. That's why the dad had no problem with it and only the mom had an issue.
 
You made two criticisms against Hillary which were exactly like two republican candidates you didn't call out for the same exact thing

And I also demonstrated why those situations are not "EXACTLY" like the other two Repub candidates you pointed out. Nothing in Hillary's life is "EXACTLY" like the other candidates. Her perceived successes or her actual failures. That's not hypocrisy. Its a fact. Its been the whole point of this discussion. Nothing she "accomplished", at any point, has been "exactly" like the other two. (That of course being....she hit the political hack, bureaucrat, lottery when her name became Clinton).

Someone who seems so focused on sentence structure and/or use of specific words should be more accurate on what you are attempting to say....exactly. She couldn't be more different than those candidates. Unfortunately those differences, simply don't make her more qualified than the others. We will continue to disagree on that basic premise no matter how many times you type "called out" or "hypocrisy".


In that situation, when you have both local and park police assuring a parent they will be with their child the entire 10 minutes, it takes a special kind of helicopter parent to not allow it.

No, it takes a special kind of parent to understand that they are ultimately responsible for the safety and well being of their child. And that the police have more important things to do at a concert than babysit a single child who has been ignorantly handed over to a complete stranger.
 
Raleigh and Rifle.......look nobody really wants either to be president so cut this dumb ass back and forth
 
.

Someone who seems so focused on sentence structure and/or use of specific words should be more accurate on what you are attempting to say....exactly. She couldn't be more different than those candidates. Unfortunately those differences, simply don't make her more qualified than the others. We will continue to disagree on that basic premise no matter how many times you type "called out" or "hypocrisy".
.

So, you will tout the experience of a person leading a Fortune 500 company, which was a complete failure, over a person who has actual high level political experience and contacts when comparing their political potential/experience. Astonishing.

And that the police have more important things to do at a concert than babysit a single child who has been ignorantly handed over to a complete stranger.

No, those police have absolutely nothing more important to do than the task they are assigned to, which is to escort me (and/or my guests) to wherever I go. That is why I told the parents the police, multiple officers from different agencies, would be right at the gate waiting for me (us) where the parents could talk to them. Then, when the girl was done, she would be escorted back by the same police officers exactly to where she entered.
 
I still haven't read a specific Hillary success besides....."yes My husband Bill was a gov and prez." If success to you is being touted as a carpet bagger senator...and quitting.....before losing an election to a no name junior senator.....before being given a job because you lost.....and then quitting....before the failures in that role could pile up.....

If that's success???? What can I say??
 
If we're looking for any pattern of "success" among the 20+ current candidates, then we're in big trouble.

Not a single one would I currently vote for......I like some of Bernie's ideas but he's a bit of a nut and has no chance.
 
"I want to be your President"
0710b07043cb9410f30e6a7067007178.jpg
 
If we're looking for any pattern of "success" among the 20+ current candidates, then we're in big trouble.

Not a single one would I currently vote for......I like some of Bernie's ideas but he's a bit of a nut and has no chance.

Serious question. What exactly do you consider a "pattern of success" you would vote for?
 
Serious question. What exactly do you consider a "pattern of success" you would vote for?

Has successfully served multiple terms in a National Political Office. Has presented and or supported legislation that benefits his or her constituents. Has political connections and works across party lines. Doesn't toe the party line of either party.

Has previous successful experience within the business world. Owned his or her own business or ran a successful business.

Isn't owned by Lobbyists.

That's a few of my wishes.......Hopefully over the next several months, someone proves worthy of my vote.

Tired of voting for the "next best" or "least worst" or "Lessor of two evils".
 
Speaking of Carly, I recently spoke with a former HP employee and her name came up, he said he initially liked her and feels she became an egotistical maniac by the end of her reign.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT