First off, its 4 years, not 3. Dan was hired in 2014. He got the team to the conference finals in 2016 and won it in 2017.
.
No, moron, it is three years, not the four you claim. When people refer to "years" in talking about an athletic season, they don't count the 2018-2019 season as two years. It is one year. For instance, Elmore had a better Junior YEAR than senior YEAR. That doesn't mean that he was better in just the part of his junior year that was in 2017. It means he was better in his junior YEAR (2017-2018) than he was in his senior YEAR (2018-2019).
Dan took us to the finals in 2016-2017. He won the championship in 2017-2018. He failed in 2018-2019. That means he has gone to the conference championship in two out of the last three years, which is exactly what I said.
Another way to dumb it down and look at it: the conference championship is held in March each year.
2017: played in the championship
2018: won the championship
2019: didn't make it
We haven't reached March of 2020. In other words, Marshall has played for the conference championship in two of the last three years.
Everything you say is correct. .
Well, I just proved that to be wrong. You should be used to it.
But it is important to remember that CUSA was formed for football and is made up of 14 schools each trying to play at the same level in football. Men’s basketball, and everything else, was drug along, and the 14 different schools have vastly different goals and levels of commitment to basketball, et al.
So while MU football must best 14 teams; MU basketball really only should have to worry about 5 or 6.
Let me show you the illogic in your claim.
Football drives the SEC. That being the case, does that mean it is acceptable for an Alabama, an LSU, or a Georgia to lose to a Vandy? If that is what drives that conference and each school tries their hardest to succeed in football and puts most of their marbles in football, it would be understandable if Vandy beat those teams, right? Of course not. Why not? Because Alabama, LSU, and Georgia have huge advantages to winning in football than Vandy does. They have much better facilities, much higher coaching salaries, much bigger fan bases, much better history, and far lower academic restrictions on recruits than Vandy does.
Likewise, you claim that football is what drives C-USA. You claim that all of those schools put most of their marbles into football in C-USA. Fair enough - but you must look at the things we just looked at in regards to SEC football. Just like Vandy shouldn't beat Alabama, Georgia, or LSU, schools like FIU, Old Dominion, Charlotte, Rice, etc. shouldn't have any chance against Marshall. Why? For the same reasons that Vandy shouldn't against Alabama, Georgia, or LSU. Marshall has huge advantages to winning in football over those schools.
It's really not a tough concept. Even somebody who is wrong as much as you are should be able to understand it.