ADVERTISEMENT

How can you justify this?

she wiped her servers clean with a cloth or something while there was a subpoena for them.
thats-not-how-this-works-thats-not-how-any-of-this-works.gif
 
Take it up with Trump’s attorney. Like I said, I don’t know what to believe.
Guys that have an axe to grind with Trump told CNN.

Of course a President could have a standing order to declassify. They know that. There is guy right there in that article that Trump did it on multiple occassions.

The corrupt DOJ and politcal arm of the Democrat Party is trying to say it is obstruction of justice. They don't have jack squat on him in terms of classification. It is just a political stall tactic.
 
In late 2014, the State Department asked Clinton and other former secretaries of state to hand over any work-related emails they may have.

By then, Clinton had already "deleted some [emails] over time as an ordinary user would," FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers at a July congressional hearing.


And she tasked her legal team to determine which of the roughly 60,000 emails still on her server were work-related.

"Clinton told the FBI that she directed her legal team to provide any work-related or arguably work-related emails to State; however she did not participate in the development of the specific process to be used or in discussions of the locations of where her emails might exist," the FBI concluded in its investigative summary of the case.

Comey testified that the FBI "didn't find any evidence of evil intent and intent to obstruct justice."
 
Guys that have an axe to grind with Trump told CNN.

Of course a President could have a standing order to declassify. They know that. There is guy right there in that article that Trump did it on multiple occassions.

The corrupt DOJ and politcal arm of the Democrat Party is trying to say it is obstruction of justice. They don't have jack squat on him in terms of classification. It is just a political stall tactic.
Ever stop and ask yourself why everybody who works for him ends up with an axe to grind?
 
Ever stop and ask yourself why everybody who works for him ends up with an axe to grind?
Not really. But, in this case most of those people were inside the betlway lifers and such that Trump brought on and trusted. They tried to burn him.
 
In late 2014, the State Department asked Clinton and other former secretaries of state to hand over any work-related emails they may have.

By then, Clinton had already "deleted some [emails] over time as an ordinary user would," FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers at a July congressional hearing.


And she tasked her legal team to determine which of the roughly 60,000 emails still on her server were work-related.

"Clinton told the FBI that she directed her legal team to provide any work-related or arguably work-related emails to State; however she did not participate in the development of the specific process to be used or in discussions of the locations of where her emails might exist," the FBI concluded in its investigative summary of the case.

Comey testified that the FBI "didn't find any evidence of evil intent and intent to obstruct justice."
Comet lol
 
I don't watch CNN. I probably saw it on twitter.

It's a common trope for "you should have seen the other guy."

a few things can be true at once:
1. hillary/hunter biden did bad stuff
2. trump did bad stuff
3. there are different "rules" for 1 and 2.

But if you can't admit to #2 you lose credibility.
Saw this post and did not read farther, but would say if you also can't admit to
#1 you are as bad as those who can't admit to #2.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT