John Bolton May Get His War After All .....
- Thread starter From Ashes To Glory 2
- Start date
You're going to choose between cottrell and bush. Both can't be right. Which one is lying?
So, nothing that appeared to be an ongoing chem weapon program , and certainly no nuke stuff?
I wasn't the one asking, so why are you quoting me? I'm also prior service, US ARMY. I was trying to explain something to Cuntrytard.
You're going to choose between cottrell and bush. Both can't be right. Which one is lying?
WELL THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTION - CASE CLOSED.
WHEN HERDMAN & ALL THE OTHER POLITICAL SUCKERS WERE MARCHING AROUND HAVING THEIR GOTTA GO TO WAR RALLIES THEY WERE BEING JUST THAT - SUCKERS. STILL HAVEN'T LEARNED A THING.
Last edited:
All,
I seem to be using an older version of DTARD Translate. Does anyone know the firmware number for the latest update?
Sincerely,
mlblack16 with a period
i'm not sure i could get drunk enough to get on the level of being able to comprehend that shit.
I never went to a go to war rally, idiot. I do support the troops and the home team when we go though. Eat me.
Last edited:
No, but it will set around forever if it is abandoned.
I firmly believe Iraq had no active program.
Ahhh...a F.A.G. cut n paste, talk of WMD and Republicans wanting war. Reminds me of ‘02.
This board...
This board...
YOU CONS NEVER OWN UP TO ANYTHING - CROOKED IS YOUR PERFECT PRESIDENT
TO BAD THE REST OF US HAVE TO SUFFER ALONG WITH YOU AND PAY FOR YOUR
MULISHNESS.
TO BAD THE REST OF US HAVE TO SUFFER ALONG WITH YOU AND PAY FOR YOUR
MULISHNESS.
No, moron. Either Bush or Cottrell are lying. You get to choose which. moron.
What's bad is he knows better.
Also, I am old enough that the phrase "first strike" perks up my ears. I don't care for hearing a US Senator use that phrase so cavalierly.
All we need now are some cons such as B.C.e. bragging about the roaring Trump/GOP led economy a la 2007.
I understand you're having a hard time since you can't answer the question of whether Bush is lying or Cottrell is lying. We've got Bush on video and Cottrell's post on this board. One of them has to be wrong. Just so you know, it's called a dilemma.
Do you really not think it’s possible that they maintained chemical weapons after their facilities were disabled, thereby making everyone right? Hell, we still have munitions from the Vietnam era.
You’ll learn that having even the simplest of conversations with extragreed is a complete and utter waste of time. It’s truly a frustrating exercise.
You want to go with "possible"? Seriously? You haven't answered my question: Is George W Bush a liar?
In 2003, the Bush administration formed the Iraq Survey Group and tasked it with the job of locating WMD stockpiles in Iraq. The ISG was staffed with hundreds of intelligence analysts and military personnel from the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia.
Their findings:
"While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter."
"In practical terms, with the destruction of the Al Hakam facility, Iraq abandoned its ambition to obtain advanced BW [biological warfare] weapons quickly. ISG found no direct evidence that Iraq, after 1996, had plans for a new BW program or was conducting BW-specific work for military purposes."
Experts from the three nations failed to document any existent biological or nuclear weapons and discovered only a few random chemical weapons. The ISG concluded that contrary to what most of the world had believed, Iraq had abandoned attempts to produce WMDs. In his congressional testimony, the head of the ISG, Charles Duelfer, admitted, "We were almost all wrong" on Iraq.
No they don't have to be wrong. Good Lord, you miserable fart.
I think you have him mixed up with someone else about the dogs, senile fart.Look ^^^it's the K9 lover complaining about conversations.
One or the other is wrong. One says "no wmds", the other says "wmds." moron.
Bolton, of course, has a history of abusing U.S. intelligence to justify his foreign-policy goals. Perhaps most notorious was a May 2002 speech at the Heritage Foundation, in which Bolton, then the State Department’s undersecretary for arms-control issues, accused Cuba of developing biological weapons—an assertion American officials at the time said overstated U.S. intelligence, and which Bolton subsequently tried to repeat to Congress. Later, as the Bush administration made the case for invading Iraq, Bolton helped sell the lie that Saddam Hussein was building nuclear weapons. “We saw a pattern of Mr. Bolton trying to manipulate intelligence to justify his views,” former deputy secretary of state Tony Blinken recently toldThe New Yorker when discussing Bolton’s failure to secure Senate confirmation when he was appointed as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. “If it had happened once, maybe. But it came up multiple times, and always it was the same underlying issue: he would stake out a position, and then, if the intelligence didn’t support it, he would try to exaggerate the intelligence and marginalize the officials who had produced it.”
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/john-bolton-replaying-his-iraq-war-playbook-with-iran
WHAT IS IT WITH ALL THESE BAD ASS WHY DONT I SEND YOU OFF TO WAR WHILE SIT HERE BEHIND MY SAFE DESK AND THINK UP MORE LIES CHICKENHAWKS
Yale was riven by the Vietnam War, which Bolton supported, at least rhetorically. The draft board was calling up tens of thousands of college-age men to serve, and Bolton preëmpted the possibility by joining the Maryland National Guard. +
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/05/06/john-bolton-on-the-warpath
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/john-bolton-replaying-his-iraq-war-playbook-with-iran
WHAT IS IT WITH ALL THESE BAD ASS WHY DONT I SEND YOU OFF TO WAR WHILE SIT HERE BEHIND MY SAFE DESK AND THINK UP MORE LIES CHICKENHAWKS
Yale was riven by the Vietnam War, which Bolton supported, at least rhetorically. The draft board was calling up tens of thousands of college-age men to serve, and Bolton preëmpted the possibility by joining the Maryland National Guard. +
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/05/06/john-bolton-on-the-warpath
Last edited:
I didn't mention anything about your confidence. I said you're a stupid moron.
Brits dispute administration claims in Iran
https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1006291?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE=#aoh=15580475255628&_ct=1558047529652&referrer=https://www.google.com&_tf=From %1$s&share=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-administration-s-iran-threat-claim-disputed-foreign-officials-n1006291
https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1006291?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE=#aoh=15580475255628&_ct=1558047529652&referrer=https://www.google.com&_tf=From %1$s&share=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-administration-s-iran-threat-claim-disputed-foreign-officials-n1006291
