That's fine. Just go back and read the thread where your own source agreed with me, and where you exhibited your failure at reading comprehension and logic again.
That's fine. Just go back and read the thread where your own source agreed with me, and where you exhibited your failure at reading comprehension and logic again.
I think her adoption fee might have been $250, but we've spent over $30,000 in vet bills and surgery costs chasing the root cause of an autoimmune disorder that caused her paralysis and over half a dozen tissue inflammations that turn into tunneling wounds if not debrided and affected tissue removed in about 48 hours tops.In these photos you will see $1200 worth of dogs in one picture and a brand new $100 hunting jacket in the other, complete with time stamps. It’s just that easy.
Showing Off The Wealth
It's "thinks."he really think I am
Nobody has made fun of Murox's $300k house. He has mocked my vehicles as not being nice enough. I have mocked his house for being worth less than half of mine.
Birthinghips, let me give you an example of how it possible to prove something beyond doubt:
You have referenced my “$300k home” no fewer than 20 times in the past three days. You claim to have knowledge of the Huntington housing market beyond an expert in that field that has already corrected you.
You and I will send big country $10,000 each to be placed in escrow (I will cover any costs). I will pay the $2000 or so to have my house appraised. If the value of the house is below $400,000 (I’m giving you a $100k cushion) bc will send you $20,000. If it’s above $400,000, he will send me $20,000.
This is how you settle ambiguity. Don’t respond to this with a 20,000 character word salad. Deal or no deal?
I totally agree with this post. Old lady and I have talked this over numerous times about how to spend a winning jackpot. We currently have 3200 square feet which is way too much. 2000 is plenty for a nice farmhouse, and maybe 20 wooded acres to put up some Amish cabins to use as partying spots, along with a kickass pole barn to park vehicles and setup the woodworking equipment and her quilting bullshit. Maybe separate barns for that. All you really need is a nice $500,000.00 RV, and just travel the damn country. Stay a few steps ahead of the assholes that want a piece of those jackpot winnings.And I bet it isn't a mansion. Even if I hit the lottery, I wouldn't want a huge house. What a pain in the butt that would be. A 10 bay garage, sure. Attached to a 2k sq ft house lol.
you're some kind of pennies on the dollar expert.
Is making $.09/dollar "pennies on the dollar"? What about $.36? What about $.60.
Hahaha. There’s that classic misdirection everyone on earth saw coming!
Try not to change the subject. Do you accept the offer or not?
Rifle is incapable of simply saying yes or no.Hahaha. There’s that classic misdirection everyone on earth saw coming!
Try not to change the subject. Do you accept the offer or not?
It's "thinks."
Mines is 7001 sq ft.Between my home and building, I own 7000 sq ft. I’m very happy with that. And yes, there probably aren’t many people on here that can say the same
Okay. That was pretty damn funny.🤣Not according to the people I wear nearly a quarter-million dollars of diamonds in front of.
What is the point for the ghost producer/writer if they are having a tax burden? It ruins the whole point.
🤣🤣. Paying taxes and paying others you are contractually obligated to pay ruins the point of working…..Interesting take.They'd not only pay a 20% fee to a manager plus splitting points with other creatives,
No, it ruins the point of giving away points, not the point of working. And they aren't contractually obligated if they don't get points.🤣🤣. Paying taxes and paying others you are contractually obligated to pay ruins the point of working…..Interesting take.
It entirely makes sense in multiple ways, and the fact that I have to explain common things like this is why you've earned the nickname ITT.but it makes zero business sense why you would intentionally be looking to pay them under the table as it relates to your own tax/business expense/deductions. Unless of course you too, in the course of that or future transactions, are essentially doing the same thing the ghost producer is doing (illegally hiding income).
Another interesting role you mentioned earlier….you being the producer…needing a ghost producer to step in and do the work so you can get the credit.
Brass or woodwinds?I've played two instruments since I was in fourth grade.
Brass or woodwinds?
Because the follow up “skin flute” jokes don’t fall in those categories.Why are string and percussion not choices?
I forgot. It's because you said brass. I was surprised when I read this years ago because I played brass.Why are string and percussion not choices?
It’s exactly why you bring in a ghost producer/writer. You need them. It’s OK to say you need someone else’s expertise.I don't "need" any of that
Yeah. Apparently he forgot that claim too.I forgot. It's because you said brass
It’s exactly why you bring in a ghost producer/writer. You need them. It’s OK to say you need someone else’s expertise.
It’s apparently why the industry created these roles. They have a skill set (you don’t) and you can find the input necessary for a successful project, pay them less, while publicly claiming all the credit for the creation.
Yeah. Apparently he forgot that claim too.
Birthinghips the tax cheat should have spent more time crafting his fantasy before presenting it to people who understand tax code.I mean if the guy would just make random unprovable boasts and move on here he wouldn't look like such a pathetic stooge.
The more he blathers on, that's what gets him in trouble. If he just boasted, we'd laugh and think it's pathetic but he wouldn't look so bad.
Take it easy on him. His junior high oboe skills set him up perfectly for delivering sandwiches to recording studios everywhere.I mean if the guy would just make random unprovable boasts and move on here he wouldn't look like such a pathetic stooge.
The more he blathers on, that's what gets him in trouble. If he just boasted, we'd laugh and think it's pathetic but he wouldn't look so bad.
Put a note under the blade with the current date and your third grade teacher’s maiden name then take a photo or no one will believe you.Just wanted to let everyone know that I bought my wife new wiper blades for her Tahoe today. And no, not generic but the kind with Rainx infused. Bam!
Put a note under the blade with the current date and your third grade teacher’s maiden name then take a photo or no one will believe you.
Just wanted to let everyone know that I bought my wife new wiper blades for her Tahoe today. And no, not generic but the kind with Rainx infused. Bam!
Not in any way, ITT. You continue to fail with your attempts.It’s exactly why you bring in a ghost producer/writer. You need them. It’s OK to say you need someone else’s expertise.
There are multiple reasons why it happens. Pay them less? No, they earn more from it, which is why even established writers, producers, and artists do it instead of just newcomers doing it.It’s apparently why the industry created these roles. They have a skill set (you don’t) and you can find the input necessary for a successful project, pay them less, while publicly claiming all the credit for the creation.
Yeah. Apparently he forgot that claim too.
You have reading problems (and now writing problems with your claim that I inferred that I paid their taxes for them). I clearly said that how they handle their taxes is their own business. What I said was that I handle the tax burden, not that I "paid their taxes." In fact, I even said "my tax burden," as it's mine, not theirs.Not surprisingly rifle seemingly contradicted himself (again) in this thread by first inferring that he paid the taxes for these individuals (presumably by not claiming the payments made to them as business deductions) and then later saying he didn't know or care what they did and that it was up to them and their CPA to report.
Sure I can. Reference any of my tax returns since 2008 for proof. But you keep introducing straw men by claiming that I said that I pay their taxes. I take on the tax burden. Again, I even said it was "my tax burden."One can't take the position that since I didn't take the deduction they don't need to pick up the payments as income since I in effect "paid their taxes".
Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code basically says an individual has to include on their tax return income from all sources. This is in direct contradiction to what he has indicated he is doing. Here is a link to a wiki page for IRC 61.
You have reading problems (and now writing problems with your claim that I inferred that I paid their taxes for them). I clearly said that how they handle their taxes is their own business. What I said was that I handle the tax burden, not that I "paid their taxes." In fact, I even said "my tax burden," as it's mine, not theirs.
They pay no taxes from the money that I give them, I handle the tax portion since I am the one receiving the payment.
By being the ghost, they don't lose 20% to their manager. They don't have to pay 30% - 40% in taxes. It's a huge incentive for them to lose only a fraction of that.
I have more of an ability to absorb that additional income and legally not to have to pay as high of taxes as them for multiple reasons.
Only after you changed your originally story because you had painted yourself into a corner.
You really need to be better at this because your contradictions and outright lies give you away...
My reading comprehension allows me to recognize that...🙂👍
So you still weren't able to show where I said that I pay their taxes, which is the claim you made.
They pay no taxes from the money that I give them, I handle the tax portion since I am the one receiving the payment.
You have reading problems (and now writing problems
That’s not paying their taxes. Think about it: if you’re arguing that they still have a tax obligation, how could I be paying their taxes?🥱🥱🥱 I most certainly did...
That’s not paying their taxes. Think about it: if you’re arguing that they still have a tax obligation, how could I be paying their taxes?
They pay no taxes from the money that I give them, I handle the tax portion since I am the one receiving the payment.
Ummm... Reading comprehension...
That is exactly what you originally posted...
"They pay no taxes from the money I give them. I handle the tax portion since I am the one receiving the payment."
Are you ready this stupid or do you just like being argumentative?