Just more fantasy fiction from modern day L. Ron Hubbard. No wonder greed loves him.I knew he was lying again when he said you were at wvu before becoming a MU fan because of him.
Just more fantasy fiction from modern day L. Ron Hubbard. No wonder greed loves him.I knew he was lying again when he said you were at wvu before becoming a MU fan because of him.
Go French kiss your dog. Stupid punk.Just more fantasy fiction from modern day L. Ron Hubbard. No wonder greed loves him.
I knew he was lying again when he said you were at wvu before becoming a MU fan because of him.
it really kind of puts in perspective how twisted and pathetic rifle really is.That was news to me as well. I guess he was playing the long game with all of that Herd gear growing up, plus all of the arguments he made in favor of Marshall, his entire childhood and early adult life. No… It was Riflearm all along that made him a fan.
Eh it's the Grammys. It's always going to be some big production. Remember Sturgill at the Grammys in 2017? I can promise you his concerts are nothing like that lol.but I realize that is not what audiences want today. The big show seems to be most important.
Eh it's the Grammys. It's always going to be some big production.
Yeah, and it was the third smallest viewing broadcast in its history. Guess I’m not the only one who doesn’t care anymore.Eh it's the Grammys. It's always going to be some big production.
All TV programming faces the same problem: too many choices today.Yeah, and it was the third smallest viewing broadcast in its history. Guess I’m not the only one who doesn’t care anymore.
I read that Stevie Wonder and Chris Stapleton performed together...isn't that appealing to more than a slice?If they ever tried to appeal to everyone
All TV programming faces the same problem: too many choices today.
yes but I think all of the other antics turns a large number of people away. so no matter how many ways you try to spin this the numbers are crashingI read that Stevie Wonder and Chris Stapleton performed together...isn't that appealing to more than a slice?
Are you really this dumb? The Grammys just had their highest TV audience over the last three years. The bigger aspect is that the Super Bowl has dropped since their peak of 2015 (115M viewers). Over the last dozen years, the Super Bowl has had their lowest viewer total (TV and streaming) each of the last four years.Grammys by comparison.
I am sure they don't care how many view the Grammys these days. It seems they have an agenda most of the time. If they ever tried to appeal to everyone not just a slice of the viewing audience I would wager their viewership would double.
^^racist^^We get it: too many blacks. You don't have to mince words around here and hide your hood.
Are you really this dumb?
The NFL has backed off the woke stuff and viewers seem to be coming back.
I'll say that again: Over the past 12 years, the Super Bowl's worst four years of viewership has been the last four.
The Super Bowl, like the Grammys, has seen a significant drop since each of their peaks over the last dozen years, which also aligns with when most viewers started having far more options.
that's not true at all, I just don't care for it regardless of if the people on it are white, black or brown. Do you watch the Dove Awards? I doubt it. And if not why not? Probably, because you have no interest in Christian music. Do you watch the CMT Music Awards.I doubt it . Doesn't make you a racist or anything else now does it?We get it: too many blacks. You don't have to mince words around here and hide your hood.
That attempt failed in the other thread for you. That ruins this claim, too. You try so hard to find anything that I do incorrectly, that you end up looking like a fool when you try making a claim that doesn't work out. Stop trying so hard and know your place on the board.Well we know logic and statistics are just a couple of your many deficiencies as a person so please try to follow along...
Moron, you posted a fvcking graph showing the ratings for the Super Bowl. You can't make much more of a specific reference than that, dumbass. This is what I mean: you're trying so hard to find an error, that you end up looking like a moron.Hmmm... I made a specific reference to the NFL, not the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl reference was offered as a contrast to the more extreme drop seen by the Grammys.
That attempt failed in the other thread for you. That ruins this claim, too. You try so hard to find anything that I do incorrectly, that you end up looking like a fool when you try making a claim that doesn't work out. Stop trying so hard and know your place on the board.
Moron, you posted a fvcking graph showing the ratings for the Super Bowl. You can't make much more of a specific reference than that, dumbass. This is what I mean: you're trying so hard to find an error, that you end up looking like a moron.
While there are more choices today and demographics of viewers (and non-viewers) are changing, the decline the Grammys has seen are very dramatic.
Grammys by comparison.
The NFL has backed off the woke stuff and viewers seem to be coming back.
You carved him up. Honestly, rifle is probably the most disappointing pretend rich/successful guy I've ever seenI enjoy so much when you get painted in a corner then you resort to your usual defense without teeth - the mindless name-calling...
So... Back up what you have posted or refute what I have without resorting to that name-calling. I know what the answer will be. It will be more name-calling because you can't. I understand that even though you can't...
Do I need to define what general means as well as what specific means?
I made a specific reference to Super Bowl viewership as a specific comparison to Grammys viewership.
I also made a general reference to the NFL and used a past tense verb (backed) to describe them abandoning the woke stuff and then used a present tense verb (coming) to describe viewers coming back. If I were making a specific reverence to last year's Super Bowl I would have used a past tense verb as in "more viewers tuned into last year's Super Bowl".
I then supported my assertion that viewers seem to be coming back (as in this year, not last year's Super Bowl) by offering some information that reflected just that.
Fire away with the names. I do wish you'd show some originality and creativity by coming up with some new ones. Frankly the ones you have been using are becoming a little too predictable...
Yeah, I thought that was odd.Trying to argue that Raoul's comment is false by claiming that the Super Bowl hasn't seen a significant drop is bogus.
because I knew someone would make some dumb point using the Super Bowl.
I MEAN IT'S THE GODDAMN SUPER BOWL
peaked in 2015 so obviously something is going on.
peaked in 2015 so obviously something is going on.
Yeah, I thought that was odd.
All TV programming faces the same problem: too many choices today.
Go back and notice a comment I made about video games. It's not just watching Netflix. So many more options, indeed. That age group fits right in with the growth of that activity.The younger group is not interested in baseball as well as seemingly sports in general. The 18-49 age group just doesn't seem to be as interested in sports or tv viewership in general as the previous generation.
Anecdotal evidence is college football and basketball games. It seems far fewer students go to games except for possibly some top-tier programs.
Yes.BTW you do realize that since 2021 Nielsen has been including streaming in their numbers don't you?
No, just you.After all the rest of us are stupid, right?
They lied to Stevie and told him he was performing with Dr DreI read that Stevie Wonder and Chris Stapleton performed together...isn't that appealing to more than a slice?
Saw Sturgill play in KY a few years ago - effing great show. I can only imagine the energy in some of the bars he played on the way up.Eh it's the Grammys. It's always going to be some big production. Remember Sturgill at the Grammys in 2017? I can promise you his concerts are nothing like that lol.
I'd actually like to hear a collab between Dre & Stapleton. Be like a reverse Rick Rubin situationThey lied to Stevie and told him he was performing with Dr Dre
This is great. Even though the Grammys number from last week has been almost immediately available, he chooses to not use that number, since it was about 25% higher than the year he wants to use.What I think is odd is that you think the loss of viewship in the Grammys, Oscar's, etc. is due to the following...
While that is true to a degree, it in no way explains what is contributing to the extreme drops from 2015-2022 for:
Grammys 25.3 to 9.6 -62.5%
Oscars 37.3 to 15.4 -58.7%
And this is why you're a moron. You have the ability to compare two like-events: annual events that are the culmination of that industry's year. But instead, you want to compare a single event in one industry to about 300 events from another industry and draw a conclusion? That's moronic, moron.Lastly back to my original general point about the NFL before you and rifle got so triggered and sidetracked by my specific reference to the Super Bowl.
From 2015 to 2022 the NFL average regular season viewership had decreased from 17.1 to 16.7, a decrease of 2.3%.
Do you think he can spell narcissist, or even know that he is one?You just listed 12 reasons why you are...
Do you think he can spell narcissist, or even know that he is one?
Go back and notice a comment I made about video games. It's not just watching Netflix. So many more options, indeed. That age group fits right in with the growth of that activity.
No, just you.
Sometimes I am amazed at how fvcking stupid the average person is
because some of you are idiots.
There's 74,223,974 other dummies like you.