ADVERTISEMENT

Nancy Pelosi's Husband Beaten With Hammer During Home Invasion

But it’s not that complicated and I’m not sure what you’re not getting.

Only thing I'm not getting is how you can say it's not that complicated...

You are just as guilty as the ones you claim are jumping to conclusions. You have the entire crime scene laid out in your mind by only hearing the spin and not hearing the 911 calls, no video of the break-in and no security system alerts??? I'd say that is jumping to conclusions as well. Regardless, we will likely never know the actual story of what happened.
 
I have not heard that he worshiped Satan, drank blood, or owned a pizza joint.

Nice deflection. You sidestep the main point by bringing up those statements. Typical liberal argument.

Meanwhile we all know what happened to Epstein, Maxwell and Prince Andrew... But yeah, laugh it off as a conspiracy theory...

You mean one bad report from a source no where near California?

Hmmm... The LA Times is no where near California??? I did not know that...

Uh, I'm ridiculing you fvcks.

Correction - trying to ridicule...

Meanwhile we're successful at triggering you and your liberal cohorts...

I am not painting shit. I'm telling you he's likely a paranoid schizo. IDGAF what his politics are unless he is sane, and from what has been reported from those who know him, he is not.

I'll just let your post below speak to that...

Maybe Facebook is part of the coverup, by deleting his profile with all that Q and election denying shit on it!

There's nothing funny about some nut trying to murder an old man.

Really it was a "mostly peaceful home invasion"...

Nah. As Hokies noted, he was on a mission, and Mr. Pelosi was not the mission. Dude got pissed the po-po ruined his mission. He's have hit the cops too if he could have.

So the presence of the police caused the "mostly peaceful home invasion" to turn violent??? Maybe they should have sent mental health providers instead. Isn't that what all you liberals believe?


It makes sense when you look at it through the lens of crazy.

It may to you since you are in your left mind but it doesn't to me since I'm in my right mind...
 
On scanner data Pelosi referred to the guy as a friend.

They guy, by his neighbors, referred to him as a nudist drug abuser. In San Fran.

But, now the left wing wants to call this guy a right winger.

Don't add up.
let's wait and hear from Hokies, he seems certain he knows the facts....lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyMUfan
Nice deflection.
Deflecting from what, the exact words I posted that you responded to?
The LA Times
Took another report and ran with it. That original report was retracted. A lesson learned there, don't trust other media to write your reports for you.
Correction - trying to ridicule...
Well of course you wouldn't get it. You don't get a lot, and there's a reason for that.

AlarmingFelineIndianhare-max-1mb.gif



I'll just let your post below speak to that...
It's called sarcasm. Which you don't get. Why don't you get it? See above.
Isn't that what all you liberals believe?
I would have shot the guy. This is why I am not a cop, I would be doing a lot of shooting paperwork.
 
Took another report and ran with it. That original report was retracted. A lesson learned there, don't trust other media to write your reports for you.

When has the media ever learned that lesson?

There's nothing funny about some nut trying to murder an old man.

But making fun of autism is???

Well of course you wouldn't get it. You don't get a lot, and there's a reason for that.

AlarmingFelineIndianhare-max-1mb.gif

It's called sarcasm. Which you don't get. Why don't you get it? See above.

But for sarcasm to be effective it has to be rooted in both truth and humor. Watch the Indian comic...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mlblack16.
No recording or pictures?
The article states there are recordings…

“The officer in D.C. quickly pulled up additional camera angles from around Pelosi’s home and began to backtrack, watching recordings from the minutes before San Francisco police arrived. There, on camera, was a man with a hammer, breaking a glass panel and entering the speaker’s home, according to three people familiar with how Capitol Police learned of the break-in and who have been briefed on or viewed the video themselves.”
 
When has the media ever learned that lesson?
A long time ago. It has been forgotten in this age of instant news.
But making fun of autism is???
I celebrate your autism. As I do Elon's....he'd be a hell of a lot less interesting otherwise.
But for sarcasm to be effective it has to be rooted in both truth and humor
Oh, there's truth in it. And you nuts are dumb enough that it's funny.
 
The fastest way to end all this is to release the security & body cam footage. It really is that easy.
 
If evil spirits can’t live in Pelosi’s house anymore, does that mean Nancy will be homeless on the streets of San Francisco?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
  • Haha
Reactions: ThunderCat98
Well of course you wouldn't get it. You don't get a lot, and there's a reason for that.

AlarmingFelineIndianhare-max-1mb.gif




It's called sarcasm. Which you don't get. Why don't you get it? See above.
Wow, from the schmuck who chastised anyone for using the off color term "retard" comes the hypocritical leftist mocking of someone with ASD.

What a douche move bro. Big time douche move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Remember when I mocked you morons for yet another conspiracy theory? How's is Paul Pelosi's gay lover doing, morons?
 
A judge ruled the bodycam footage can be released. MSN is reporting the DA is opposed to the release of the footage. It's interesting - the reason people have been asking for it to be made public - to quickly prove what happened, the DA is pushing back saying the video could be manipulated. Could. Like that's an acceptable reason for not releasing evidence publicly.
 
A judge ruled the bodycam footage can be released. MSN is reporting the DA is opposed to the release of the footage. It's interesting - the reason people have been asking for it to be made public - to quickly prove what happened, the DA is pushing back saying the video could be manipulated. Could. Like that's an acceptable reason for not releasing evidence publicly.
Wouldn’t the da have possession of the footage? If so who in the da’s office would manipulate it
 
Wouldn’t the da have possession of the footage? If so who in the da’s office would manipulate it
When this event occurred, Pelosi was still House Speaker. Considering how powerful of a position she held along with how damn long the old hag has been in public office, I'm sure her connections are limitless.

It would be naive to think she can't have crucial evidence swept under the rug.
 
When this event occurred, Pelosi was still House Speaker. Considering how powerful of a position she held along with how damn long the old hag has been in public office, I'm sure her connections are limitless.

It would be naive to think she can't have crucial evidence swept under the rug.
The dude was over at the Pelosis for Gay sex with Paul. I think that’s quite obvious to anyone who thinks logically.
 
Be interesting to see if they release the body cam footage from the Pelosi attack at the same time as the Tyre Nichols footage.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT