ADVERTISEMENT

Obama, most admired man in the world

Referendum against his polices and Hillary

It wasn't a popularity poll, the question was who is a better president. You're forgetting that Hillary won the popular vote. So no, it was not a referendum on the.policies of Obama when he out polls Cheetos by 19%.
 
a less threatening Wayne Brady

giphy.gif
 
It wasn't a popularity poll, the question was who is a better president. You're forgetting that Hillary won the popular vote. So no, it was not a referendum on the.policies of Obama when he out polls Cheetos by 19%.
Your forgetting that states that went for Obama turned.
 
Your forgetting that states that went for Obama turned.

You're forgetting that if someone wins a popular vote by 19%, it would be a U S presidential election record, and Cheetos would have lost in a landslide, both in popular and electoral votes.
 
You're forgetting that if someone wins a popular vote by 19%, it would be a U S presidential election record, and Cheetos would have lost in a landslide, both in popular and electoral votes.
Popularity polls and elections are not the same
 
You're forgetting that if someone wins a popular vote by 19%, it would be a U S presidential election record, and Cheetos would have lost in a landslide, both in popular and electoral votes.
You forget winning the popular vote means absolutely nothing in presidential elections.
 
No it really doesn’t. It’s like scoring 30 of your teams 50 points in a game and still losing.

Yes, it really does. By that 19% polling, obama would have won the popular vote by not 2.8 million like hillary did, but by 24 million votes. I know it wouldn't work like this, but if you divided those 24 million votes equally among the states, obama would have won something like 19 more states(39 states) than hillary did. It would be more like playing a game where 50 is the most points you can score and obama scores 39.
 
Yes, it really does. By that 19% polling, obama would have won the popular vote by not 2.8 million like hillary did, but by 24 million votes. I know it wouldn't work like this, but if you divided those 24 million votes equally among the states, obama would have won something like 19 more states(39 states) than hillary did. It would be more like playing a game where 50 is the most points you can score and obama scores 39.
Hillary lost get over it. The popular vote means absolutely nothing in a presidential election. If you’re struggling with that go audit yourself.
 
Hillary lost get over it. The popular vote means absolutely nothing in a presidential election. If you’re struggling with that go audit yourself.

If you think someone who runs 19% (24 million people) better in a nationwide poll doesn't beat cheetos, you're just a complete moron.
 
Ok, you're back to being a moron. Right where you belong.
Not at all. Popular vote is nothing but a participation trophy when electing the president. It’s a meaningless statistic that makes democrats feel better. They know we elect the president through the electoral college yet harp on the popular vote to get two religion idiots like you worked up over nothing
 
So, you've conceded that popular vote can be important??

No you imbecile. He's saying Californians and New Yorkers are fvcked in the head, (like you) and their opinion doesn't mean shit in comparison to the remaining states.

In other words, Killary lost where it mattered. Get over it.
 
Not at all. Popular vote is nothing but a participation trophy when electing the president. It’s a meaningless statistic that makes democrats feel better. They know we elect the president through the electoral college yet harp on the popular vote to get two religion idiots like you worked up over nothing

24 million extra votes will get you a lot of extra electoral votes, moron.
 
Not if they are in California New York or other states they would have already won

Our forefathers were still forming the Constitution when Greed was in school, so he did not get to learn about the electoral college.
 
Not if they are in California New York or other states they would have already won

Yeah, let's pretend that Obama wouldn't get more electoral votes with a 19% polling advantage than he did with an average poll advantage of .7% in 2012. You're a moron.
 
You win California by 3 votes or 300000 you still get the same number of electoral votes. I’m not arguing demographics aren’t changing just that the popular vote means absolutely nothing in presidential elections. Which is in fact true. You’re the one that keeps changing the argument
 
the popular vote means absolutely nothing in presidential elections

The POPULAR VOTE in each state determines who wins the electoral votes of each state. If you think that means absolutely nothing in presidential elections, then have all the con voters stay home on election day, moron.
 
The POPULAR VOTE in each state determines who wins the electoral votes of each state. If you think that means absolutely nothing in presidential elections, then have all the con voters stay home on election day, moron.
Yet we don’t elect a president by direct popular vote. So once again nationwide popular vote doesn’t mean a damn thing when it comes to electing a president. As I said above if you win California by 3 votes or 300000 you still get the exact same number of electoral votes.
 
Yet we don’t elect a president by direct popular vote. So once again nationwide popular vote doesn’t mean a damn thing when it comes to electing a president. As I said above if you win California by 3 votes or 300000 you still get the exact same number of electoral votes.

Well, check your history, moron. Tell us how many presidents who won the popular vote by 10% or more failed to win the electoral votes.
 
Well, check your history, moron. Tell us how many presidents who won the popular vote by 10% or more failed to win the electoral votes.
Tell us again how you can win the popular vote and still lose the presidential election.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT