Beating up the ball boy should really make us America’s sweetheart team. What was our player thinking?Looks like they were arguing over a game ball. Whatevs.
Beating up the ball boy should really make us America’s sweetheart team. What was our player thinking?Looks like they were arguing over a game ball. Whatevs.
I liked how she kept saying the wrong team's name while doing play-by-play.I couldn't agree with you more. Total ODU homer. Plus inaccurate in her constant comments that Marshall needs to win out. If Georgia Southern loses to Appalachian St. which could realistically happen, Marshall wins the East even with a loss to JMU next weekend.
Nah. Freak that dude. He put his hands on the player first. He got exactly what he deserved.Beating up the ball boy should really make us America’s sweetheart team. What was our player thinking?
Seymour is bad at adjustments, has been all year. The ODU OC made great adjustments that almost won the game for them.Entire defensive side of the football failed to show up, coaches included.
No, he didn’t. Moten was trying to steal the ball that he didn’t give back after his first quarter INT. It’s why he was trying to hide the ball under his jersey while running off the field. The ball boy did what he was supposed to do. He didn’t “put his hands on the player.” He tried hitting the ball out of Moten’s hands to get the stolen ball back.Nah. Freak that dude. He put his hands on the player first. He got exactly what he deserved.
Yes, we were. You know that clip wil be replayed over and over. Not the kind of image we want.Marshall was the wrong entirely at fault:
Do you think the defense played well last night? And played well enough to win isn't a valid answerI started to reply once with “well that didn’t age well”. But then I kept scrolling and realized how many times I would need to do it. So I didn’t.
Comic gold in this thread.
FYI. We won. And it wasn’t “lucky”
No it won't. It will be forgotten by 1 pm todayYes, we were. You know that clip wil be replayed over and over. Not the kind of image we want.
Do you think the defense played well last night? And played well enough to win isn't a valid answer
Yes winning is the goal but it's ok to be critical even when you succeed. That's where growth happens and it's not something our defense has done lately. There are things wrong defensively and to quote your hero mark snyder, "we gotta get that fixed"How if playing well enough to win not a valid answer. That is the goal of the game. Correct?
Yes winning is the goal but it's ok to be critical even when you succeed. That's where growth happens and it's not something our defense has done lately. There are things wrong defensively and to quote your hero mark snyder, "we gotta get that fixed"
Defense could be better. But the offense is fun to watch! That’s the difference with this team vs his other teams. I know we can score at any given moment and to me, that is fun football.But. To add. The defense played very good in the first half. Giving up only 7 points to that same offense.
No, he didn’t. Moten was trying to steal the ball that he didn’t give back after his first quarter INT. It’s why he was trying to hide the ball under his jersey while running off the field. The ball boy did what he was supposed to do. He didn’t “put his hands on the player.” He tried hitting the ball out of Moten’s hands to get the stolen ball back.
Moten knew what he was doing was wrong, hence why he was trying to hide the ball under his jersey.
And now we have some moronic Marshall fan named Mark Campbell showing his ass to Sun Belt fans while Marshall was the one entirely at fault:
That was hardly "by any means necessary." Did you watch the video that wasn't televised? The video where Moten was running by him and the ball by simply reached out to knock the ball out of his arm? That's hardly "by any means necessary" and is completely reasonable and justifiable to do to somebody who is stealing your belongings.No way in hell he is told to retrieve footballs by any means necessary.
Defense held. MU won.That's a terrible excuse. The defense was getting gashed from the first drive of the 2nd half. They weren't gassed. They were just bad.
But MU won???The lack of coaching adjustments by Marshall is maddening.
And the defense played like sh!t. Don't want to hear me bitch, block me.Defense held. MU won.
Stop b*tching.
And the defense played like sh!t. Don't want to hear me bitch, block me.
Defense could be better. But the offense is fun to watch! That’s the difference with this team vs his other teams. I know we can score at any given moment and to me, that is fun football.
Of course I was bitching. We gave up 150+ years on the ground to a qb. As a fan, I'm pretty sure I'm entitled to bitch about it. How is that in any way a "melt down"?So you admit you are?
It's entertaining to see you melt down and try to justify your useless arguments on here 🙂
Of course I was bitching. We gave up 150+ years on the ground to a qb. As a fan, I'm pretty sure I'm entitled to bitch about it. How is that in any way a "melt down"?
What an ignorant take.Yeah, their QB was mobile and torched us on the ground. He also was fumbling the ball. MU didn't get many turnovers from it but I certainly would be weary of having him doing it, which is basically all they were really able to do consistently, a big risk.
I'm not saying you can't complain, I'm saying you look foolish in doing so, especially after the game is over. You're trying to bring up things that don't matter anymore to justify whatever argument you're trying to make.
They absolutely matter especially if they aren't corrected by next weekYeah, their QB was mobile and torched us on the ground. He also was fumbling the ball. MU didn't get many turnovers from it but I certainly would be weary of having him doing it, which is basically all they were really able to do consistently, a big risk.
I'm not saying you can't complain, I'm saying you look foolish in doing so, especially after the game is over. You're trying to bring up things that don't matter anymore to justify whatever argument you're trying to make.
How many rush yards did Braxton have? 140 yards. So, it works both ways.Yeah, their QB was mobile and torched us on the ground. He also was fumbling the ball. MU didn't get many turnovers from it but I certainly would be weary of having him doing it, which is basically all they were really able to do consistently, a big risk.
I'm not saying you can't complain, I'm saying you look foolish in doing so, especially after the game is over. You're trying to bring up things that don't matter anymore to justify whatever argument you're trying to make.
Idk how you got from point A to point B. But I’m a fan of winning.Sounds like you're a fan of Hillbilly ball...
"Gosh darn, isn't the team fun?!"
What an ignorant take.
You think because it happened to work out in our favor in that particular game, we shouldn't point out and discuss the staffs' inability to recognize and counter what an opposing team was doing? Particularly when this same issue - that is, the inability to make in-game adjustments to another team's scheme - has been a recurring theme for Huff and his staff. A theme that cost us at least one game this season, multiple games in the past, and could have cost us this weekend had it not been for the heroics of Braxton' and the offense.
I don't think you understand how a message board works. You need to get off Semore's nutsack. That was an absolute disaster class on how not to play the read option and further evidence that this staff struggles with in-game adjustments.
Also, if you want to talk about ridiculous arguments, aren't you the one that claimed the defense was worn down, even though they were getting destroyed the entire second half?
They absolutely matter especially if they aren't corrected by next week
If you watch the longer video which is available the ball boy was fairly aggressive trying to retrieve the ball. A couple of ODU posters on the CUSA broad who witness the entire event said the ball boy was wrong and the Marshall player's response was also bad.
Let it go.
Idk how you got from point A to point B. But I’m a fan of winning.
How many rush yards did Braxton have? 140 yards. So, it works both ways.
The tone of your post infers that I'm upset we won. I'm not. Hell, I even said in this very thread that the defense did just enough to win. It also suggests I'm anti-Huff. This is also incorrect. See my post on the other thread re: offering him an extension."Bad coaching and lack of adjustments on defense almost cost us the game...almost because I moronically forgot MU won since they did well in other areas. If it wasn't for Braxton and that meddling offense, in would have been right."
I could give af less about Dan or hillbilly ball. 0, zilch, nada. What are you even talking about bro?Hillbilly Ball ain't winning...
I could give af less about Dan or hillbilly ball. 0, zilch, nada. What are you even talking about bro?
The tone of your post infers that I'm upset we won. I'm not. Hell, I even said in this very thread that the defense did just enough to win. It also suggests I'm anti-Huff. This is also incorrect. See my post on the other thread re: offering him an extension.
That being said, why do you think questioning poor coaching means you (1) want Marshall to lose, and/or (2) are a "bad" fan? There's nothing wrong with pointing out shortcomings with the team. Is it your position the defense was good? Because that's certainly a take. A terrible one, but a take nonetheless. This is a message board. Banter, arguing, and criticism are the entire point of it existing. If you are offended by that, maybe you should fvck off. Just a thought.
My post criticizing the defense wasn't an attempt to justify any preseason predictions. Hell, I don't even think I made any predictions. I do think we have exceeded expectations at this point. There are several reasons for that.1. Because the pre-season beliefs of the majority of people on here at the start of the season, was how bad is MU going to be and 7 wins was considered generous. Now that that has been proven largely false, people are scrambling to dissect any parts of the games (in this case, the defense) where the team doesn't play as well as a means to justify their pre-season bias.
My take was not the defense was good. It was a team effort and well balanced teams can rely on one to pick up after the other if needs be.
2. I also am not one who goes back (maybe not you directly) to other games over a month ago to point out why the HC isn't good presently. Once more, bias.
My post criticizing the defense wasn't an attempt to justify any preseason predictions. Hell, I don't even think I made any predictions. I do think we have exceeded expectations at this point. There are several reasons for that.
One of those reasons is that Huff has done an excellent job bringing in portal talent to upgrade our roster. We've simply had better players than some of our opponents this year, which has put us in excellent position going into the last week of the season. Huff should be commended for this. It's why I suggested in the other thread that we needed to be working on an extension. However, we've also benefited from playing a weak conference schedule, avoiding some of the better teams in the West. In any event, credit where it's due - we've put together a good season, regardless what happens this weekend.
Even so, this staff's inability to adjust, or to respond to our opponents' adjustments is concerning. And this isn't just about the Georgia Southern game, as you keep attempting to argue. This has been a constant problem throughout Huff's tenure. I don't think you could mount any serious arguments to the contrary. That being the case, it's okay to commend Huff and company for what they've done right, but to criticize and question the things they haven't. Huff is young. He's certainly not a finished product as a head coach. One of the things he needs to work on - maybe the most glaring - is making adjustments on the fly and closing out games. I hope he's able to do that. Hell, I hope he can do that here. But if this continues to be a problem, you shouldn't expect people to ignore it. Fans are going to fan, which means discussing and criticizing the team, coaches, and (gasp) the individual players.
If we come out and take an early lead against JMU and then let them back into the game in the second half - a running theme - don't expect people to just ignore it, whether we win or lose. It's a fair and valid point of discussion.
We fired Mark Snyder. I think we let him say he resigned, but we fired him.Has MU ever actually fired a head coach? I feel MU either has them hired away or simply doesn't re-sign...or they resign.
Anyone?