ADVERTISEMENT

Ohhhhhhh Noooooo!!!!!

I’ve been following this and I don’t think it’s really a big deal. The judge always issues the Brady order and Flynn plead out to protect his son. Nothing has changed with regards to his son

It is and isn't a big deal. For this judge it appears a standing order of process. However, the fact that this order was put in POST plea is very interesting.
 
That's a great source, Raleigh. Are they still printing articles defending men in their 30s that try to get 14 year old girls to fvck them and forcibly make the girl touch their pecker?

I'll add you to the list of "mom's basement" dwellers Raoul. This was covered in both the National Review and Washington Examiner last week.

I'll leave the worries of another man's pecker up to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
I'll add you to the list of "mom's basement" dwellers Raoul. This was covered in both the National Review and Washington Examiner last week.

I'll leave the worries of another man's pecker up to you.

remember, you are speaking to the leftist that thinks he is to the right of Eisenhower so tread lightly
 
I'll add you to the list of "mom's basement" dwellers Raoul. This was covered in both the National Review and Washington Examiner last week.

I'll leave the worries of another man's pecker up to you.

Two other fine rags. I'll add you to the list of "supposedly college educated people that believe any bullshit publication that fits their political leanings, even if it is inherently biased as well as morally corrupt."

I'm not worried about Roy Moore's pecker. If it got near my 14 old daughter he wouldn't have a pecker anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NutcaseConservative
Was that the teacher that posted here that got busted? Good thing for him I was not his judge...he would still be in prison.

Yeah...Sabo. Posted a shirtless selfie on here by mistake then got arrested for something regarding an underage girl. I can't remember exactly, but I'm sure someone on here does.
 
Two other fine rags. I'll add you to the list of "supposedly college educated people that believe any bullshit publication that fits their political leanings, even if it is inherently biased as well as morally corrupt."

.

Still waiting on the basement dwellers to explain what exactly is factually incorrect with this story.....

Speaking of “college educated people believing bullshit publications”... That dossier is really turning out to be some righteous bullshit. But then again, let’s just take advice from “independents” and blindly believe rags put together from political opponents of Repub candidates.
 
Still waiting on the basement dwellers to explain what exactly is factually incorrect with this story.....

Speaking of “college educated people believing bullshit publications”... That dossier is really turning out to be some righteous bullshit. But then again, let’s just take advice from “independents” and blindly believe rags put together from political opponents of Repub candidates.
ohhhh, well, b-b-b-b-b-b-but . . . .SOURCE . . . an-an-an-an-an-and . . . RUSSIA! all the while they slobber up everything CNN and every other lib-support-"news"-outlets put out even after they've had to retract a bunch of shit regarding trump over the past year. seriously, anytime something is posted they don't like, they're go to reply: "LOL AT YOUR SOURCE!! HAR HAR HAR!!"

same shit over and over with these guys. RD i actually thought was better than this. he's proven not to be over the past year. his feelings have been hurt just as bad as the rest of the libs. for him, i feel sorry. for the rest, i laugh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walter Brennaneer
That dossier is really turning out to be some righteous bullshit. But then again, let’s just take advice from “independents” and blindly believe rags put together from political opponents of Repub candidates.

I'm still waiting for Putin whores to explain how it is factually 100% incorrect.

I really hope the peeing part is correct. Because that's funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NutcaseConservative
I'm still waiting for Putin whores to explain how it is factually 100% incorrect.

I really hope the peeing part is correct. Because that's funny.
love this.

"your post is bullshit and the source is bullshit! dnc/clinton funded dossier used to call special counsel investigation into trump/russia collusion? tell me how it 100% factually incorrect!" oh, the fvckin' irony.

also, can't believe you slumped to the lib-level of calling people russia apologists, i.e. "putin whores". pretty disappointing/disgusting. once again, thought you were better than that. the lib way, though: for those that don't agree with you 125%, make up bullshit claims they support russia, hate cops, etc.
 
ohhhh, well, b-b-b-b-b-b-but . . . .SOURCE . . . an-an-an-an-an-and . . . RUSSIA! all the while they slobber up everything CNN and every other lib-support-"news"-outlets put out even after they've had to retract a bunch of shit regarding trump over the past year. seriously, anytime something is posted they don't like, they're go to reply: "LOL AT YOUR SOURCE!! HAR HAR HAR!!"

same shit over and over with these guys. RD i actually thought was better than this. he's proven not to be over the past year. his feelings have been hurt just as bad as the rest of the libs. for him, i feel sorry. for the rest, i laugh.

I feel sorry for you, because you support a vulgarian as POTUS. And not even a bright one. I could maybe handle a Stephen Hawking level intelligent vulgarian as POTUS.

I am definitely a source-snob, probably because in the end I am an academic and a researcher. And some of you love to post articles with one tidbit of fact but dwell on the opinion part as truth...and we all know what opinions and assholes have in common. But you tell me what makes more sense: that only fringe sources print the truth, or everyone else is printing the truth? Actually, you all should be better than this. When Nixon was a pig we didn't have normal Americans spouting "the WashPo is just a bunch of lying liberals". Now we have BC believing "crisis-actor" conspiracy BS...that's 9/11 conspiracy level horseshit. SMH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NutcaseConservative
love this.

"your post is bullshit and the source is bullshit! dnc/clinton funded dossier used to call special counsel investigation into trump/russia collusion? tell me how it 100% factually incorrect!" oh, the fvckin' irony.

also, can't believe you slumped to the lib-level of calling people russia apologists, i.e. "putin whores". pretty disappointing/disgusting. once again, thought you were better than that. the lib way, though: for those that don't agree with you 125%, make up bullshit claims they support russia, hate cops, etc.

I don't care who paid someone to assemble it. We've been over this: no one works for free. And I don't care if it is only half true: intelligence reports are usually half full of BS and half full of fact, and when the FBI, CIA, NSA all say the half that is true is indeed true and damning that should be a clue for you knuckleheads. I never thought I would see the day so-called conservatives believe Russia, fvcking RUSSIA, over the intelligence community that has been fighting Russia for decades.

The Putin slobbering goes back further than Trump. I remember many of you saying he was a real leader compared to Obama. I'm all for trying to work with Putin, but he is still a pig.

If Iran gets a new leader that looks sexy with his shirt off riding horseback, will you all be in love with him too?
 
I don't care who paid someone to assemble it. We've been over this: no one works for free. And I don't care if it is only half true: intelligence reports are usually half full of BS and half full of fact, and when the FBI, CIA, NSA all say the half that is true is indeed true and damning that should be a clue for you knuckleheads. I never thought I would see the day so-called conservatives believe Russia, fvcking RUSSIA, over the intelligence community that has been fighting Russia for decades.

The Putin slobbering goes back further than Trump. I remember many of you saying he was a real leader compared to Obama. I'm all for trying to work with Putin, but he is still a pig.

If Iran gets a new leader that looks sexy with his shirt off riding horseback, will you all be in love with him too?
typical fvcking lib speak: "don't care if it is only have true . . ." do you really not see how pathetic that statement is?

there is nothing intelligent about a document put together by a specific political party which digs up dirt on the other political party, no matter which side it comes from, and is only half truth. at the end of the day, all this "true and damning" "intelligence" in the dossier has led to greater than a year long investigation that's come up with jack shit regarding the original intention of trump and collusion. and that should be a clue for you.

but, hey, there have been american's indicted for things that haven't had shit to do with the original intention of the investigation as well as some russians who will never be prosecuted. go ahead and hang your hat on that pile of shit. just remember though, russia/trump collusion still - over a year later - has not been proven . . . and, i'll bet a dime to a dollar, won't be. yet, even though it hasn't been proven, in your eyes, those who support trump are russia sympathizers because they don't believe collusion occurred and they do support that horrible horrible man who uses twitter. get fvckin' real, man . . . how fvckin' ironic that is coming from the group who supports imposition of governmental regulation on anything and everything they can think of. if any political party could be linked to sympathizers of russia, it'd be the party who supports just that.
 
Last edited:
a real leader compared to Obama.
ahhhh, now i understand your infatuation with the "putin slobbering" thing. holy shit, that really hurt you, didn't it? LOL! on behalf of all of those who thought obummer was a POS socialist imposing the liberal way via the stroke of his pen, i sincerely apologize your feelings were hurt.

i also apologize for trump undoing that piece of shit's legacy. fvck him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walter Brennaneer
typical fvcking lib speak: "don't care if it is only have true . . ." do you really not see how pathetic that statement is?

there is nothing intelligent about a document put together by a specific political party which digs up dirt on the other political party, no matter which side it comes from, and is only half truth. at the end of the day, all this "true and damning" "intelligence" in the dossier has led to greater than a year long investigation that's come up with jack shit regarding the original intention of trump and collusion. and that should be a clue for you.

but, hey, there have been american's indicted for things that haven't had shit to do with the original intention of the investigation as well as some russians who will never be prosecuted. go ahead and hang your hat on that pile of shit. just remember though, russia/trump collusion still - over a year later - has not been proven . . . and, i'll bet a dime to a dollar, won't be. yet, because it hasn't, in your eyes, those who support trump are russia sympathizers. get fvckin' real, man . . . how fvckin' ironic that is coming from the group who supports imposition of governmental regulation on anything and everything they can think of.

i'm thinking Raoul Duke may have finally figured out he is a limp wrist leftist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brushy Bill
"don't care if it is only have true . . ." do you really not see how pathetic that statement is?

I don't care who pays for intel. If you are talking to spooks, informers, and other such types it won't all be true. You are going to get rumors, exaggerations, and dick-measuring sprinkled in with some truth. That's why intelligence analysis is a thing. It's not my problem you don't know, or get, that.

russia/trump collusion still - over a year later - has not been proven . . . and, i'll bet a dime to a dollar, won't be.

I said the same long ago. He's been dealing with the mob since the 70s. Unless there is a rat or he gets busted on money laundering. But someone sensible can smell smoke and know there is fire.

how fvckin' ironic that is coming from the group who supports imposition of governmental regulation on anything and everything they can think of.

Good thing I voted Libertarian, I guess.
 
ahhhh, now i understand your infatuation with the "putin slobbering" thing. holy shit, that really hurt you, didn't it? LOL! on behalf of all of those who thought obummer was a POS socialist imposing the liberal way via the stroke of his pen, i sincerely apologize your feelings were hurt.

i also apologize for trump undoing that piece of shit's legacy. fvck him.

I have no idea what this has to do with the Putin worship that began in Obama's presidency. Lay off the sauce.
 
smoke and fire . . . LOL, damn, RD, make fun of someone for throwing out a conspiracy theory then throw your own out and claim that if someone doesn't believe it then they don't have half a brain. if you knew half of what you thought you did, you'd be a damn rocket scientist or some crazy shit . . . well, you're obviously already a crazy shit . . . ahhh, fvck it, those with half a brain will get it.

and, if you can't link what i said above to your sad claim of putin worship, well, perhaps your just not as astute as you claim.

btw, i'll lay off the sauce when you lay off the pills and weed.
 
When you came here your fellow WVUians outed you as being from that board. Are you not a WVU fan? Do you just meander from program to program posting stuff? That would be weird.

I go to the off-topic boards to post, I don't get involved in the sports boards.
 
Then you should have came here years ago when 30 Kitty and the other WVU clowns were around. WV-FAN is alright, we adopted him.

I took a several year hiatus from the Rivals forums and only returned during the 2016 election cycle. I came back to get a gauge on what people were thinking and stayed for the fun that's ensued ever since.
 
It's not much of a conspiracy to say Trump knew the Russians were helping him. That doesn't mean it was criminal collusion. It still makes him a piece of garbage for wanting to win more than going on TV and saying "Fvck you, Russia". .

The evidence doesn't agree with you. The Russians were simply placing divisive ads on social media, some favoring liberal issues, some favoring conservative issues. Why didn't Obama and/or Hillary come out and say something either? Russia has moved on to 4th Generation warfare tactics and they seem to be working as planned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
It's not much of a conspiracy to say Trump knew the Russians were helping him. That doesn't mean it was criminal collusion. It still makes him a piece of garbage for wanting to win more than going on TV and saying "Fvck you, Russia". .

you might be crazy
 


I apologize for continuing to post this video but it appears to continue to be relevant. Either Obummer is lying or he’s essentially calling guys like RD morons.

Either way, it’s apparent the concerns over Russia only appear to be important because a Democrat lost.

Still waiting to read what is specifically incorrect in the Federalist article.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
The evidence doesn't agree with you. The Russians were simply placing divisive ads on social media, some favoring liberal issues, some favoring conservative issues. Why didn't Obama and/or Hillary come out and say something either? Russia has moved on to 4th Generation warfare tactics and they seem to be working as planned.

I absolutely agree that Obama didn't do enough. What is Trump doing to stop it from happening again?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT