rowan county

[herdit44]

how does this cvnt still have a job?

http://www.wsaz.com/news/headlines/...-Issue-Marriage-Licenses-Again-323007901.html

Davis say the Office is denying the licenses 'under God's authority'​

 

[extragreen]

You can't fire an elected official. I imagine she will be relieved of duty by the Kentucky state government.

 

[herdit44]

You can't fire an elected official. I imagine she will be relieved of duty by the Kentucky state government.

right, it's just a process to remove an elected official (and i can understand why, partially), but this woman has been collecting her pay checks and not doing a significant portion of her job for months now. it's not like she just started denying all marriage licenses, she started a couple months ago, and it'll take probably a couple more months to get her out of office.

 

[HerdandHokies]

What a nutjob.

 

[wvkeeper(HN)]

 

[i am herdman]

Well, good for her. I would make them remove me from office before I bowed to the left wing agenda.

 

[HerdandHokies]

I think she's actually going to go to jail over this if I understand it correctly.

 

[banker6796]

Issuing marriage licenses to gay couples is a "substantial portion" of her job? Geez, I went to school at Morehead and didn't realize it had become a gay Mecca where that would constitute a substantial portion.

 

[banker6796]

Also, to call her a cvnt goes straight to the issue I have with liberals. She has a different view than you so she is a piece of shite in your eyes. Liberals are the least tolerant people on the planet, on par with Muslim extremists. You have to conform to their beliefs or they would just as soon see you dead.

As far as the tweet about her four marriages, she is a fairly recent born again Christian. I don't know when her previous marriages occurred or ended. The woman appears to have a sincere belief, based on her religion, that she has to do what she is doing. The proper thing for her to do would be to stick to her beliefs and resign her position. However, her beliefs do not make her a cvnt.

 

[HerdandHokies]

I don't really care what she believes or doesn't and I don't really care how many times she's been married or if she likes chocolate or vanilla ice cream. If she doesn't want to do her job then she should quit (like you said) but she can't stay in the job and not do her duty. If she does decide to quit then I hope she lives a happy life and everyone leaves her alone.

 

[banker6796]

Obviously, I was directing my response to the OP. You don't approach the level of mindless liberal that really gets under my skin.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Considering the most important duty of a county clerk is the issuance and maintenance of all county records, yeah I would say she is failing to do a substantial part of her job

I think she's a piece of shit. She's a piece of shit because she is an official of the state sworn to uphold the Constitution, and she's instead thumbing her nose at it...without a legal leg to stand on, might I add; it's not like she has an actual point here to protest for. Throw that bitch in prison, she is in complete contempt of the Federal Courts.

 

[riflearm2]

. However, her beliefs do not make her a cvnt.

Sure, they do, just like Muslim extremists who wish death for infidels are pieces of shit, just like people who don't think different races should date/marry/mate are pieces of shit, and just like those people who pocket the funerals of our servicemen are cvnts.

Your claim that liberals are the least tolerant is a BC argument (and that's not a compliment in this instance). Liberals have no problem with the freedom of somebody to believe differently from them. But, it doesn't mean we can't call them cvnts or pieces of shit, nor should we allow their intolerant views to be made into regulations.

Saying that somebody is a hypocrite for stressing tolerance when they aren't tolerant of intolerance is an illogical argument.

 

[sistersville]

Her being divorced is a shame because it takes away from her taking a stand. Most everyone says good for her.Her being divorced also does not make gay marriage legit.

 

[extragreen]

"As far as the tweet about her four marriages, she is a fairly recent born again Christian. I don't know when her previous marriages occurred or ended. The woman appears to have a sincere belief, based on her religion, that she has to do what she is doing. The proper thing for her to do would be to stick to her beliefs and resign her position. However, her beliefs do not make her a cvnt."

Exactly.

 

[sistersville]

"As far as the tweet about her four marriages, she is a fairly recent born again Christian. I don't know when her previous marriages occurred or ended. The woman appears to have a sincere belief, based on her religion, that she has to do what she is doing. The proper thing for her to do would be to stick to her beliefs and resign her position. However, her beliefs do not make her a cvnt."

Exactly.

Sadly a few on here with all their degrees will not understand your post. Thanks extragreen

 

[HerdandHokies]

Obviously, I was directing my response to the OP. You don't approach the level of mindless liberal that really gets under my skin.

I've been considering making a post with some copy and pasted stuff from one guy I'm friends with on Facebook. The guy makes Bernie look like Cato (the Roman, not the QB.) Some of the stuff the far left thinks is so far out there it's unbelievable.

And that's a whole separate can of worms from the twittermob that will probably make this woman's life miserable whatever she does. She's done a lot of this to herself by not resigning, but I wish people would show a little grace and move on to more important things in their lives after it's over.

 

[banker6796]

There's nothing wrong, actually everything right, with standing on principal. Like I said, the proper course of action would be for her to stick to her beliefs and resign her position.

Rifle, bad analogy on the Muslim extremists. If she was shooting or beheading gay couples when they came in for a license you may have a point, but she's not.

 

[i am herdman]

If someone wanted to get married in Rowan County and they were gay and she wouldn't do it, why wouldn't they just drive 10 or 15 miles up the road to the next county and get the marriage license?

Problem solved.

 

[HerdandHokies]

If someone wanted to get married in Rowan County and they were gay and she wouldn't do it, why wouldn't they just drive 10 or 15 miles up the road to the next county and get the marriage license?

Problem solved.

For that couple yes, but for the next one that goes to a courthouse expecting basic services it'll still be a problem.

 

[WV_Celt]

Sister, you're a moron. No, not "most everyone" is saying good for her. She's in clear violation of the Constitution, the law, and a direct order from a judge. Plain and simple.

 

[extragreen]

If someone wanted to get married in Rowan County and they were gay and she wouldn't do it, why wouldn't they just drive 10 or 15 miles up the road to the next county and get the marriage license?

Problem solved.

That's some seriously malarkey.

 

[banker6796]

Why is that malarkey? People from Ohio and WV go to KY all the time around here to get a license because the rules are different in KY, quicker and easier. They don't stand outside the Lawrence County and Cabell County Courthouses and protest, they just go to where they can accomplish what they want to accomplish.

Oh, that's right, they want to force someone to do something against their beliefs just to make a point that you will accept them.

 

[extragreen]

Why is that malarkey? People from Ohio and WV go to KY all the time around here to get a license because the rules are different in KY, quicker and easier. They don't stand outside the Lawrence County and Cabell County Courthouses and protest, they just go to where they can accomplish what they want to accomplish.

Oh, that's right, they want to force someone to do something against their beliefs just to make a point that you will accept them.

No, the malarkey is that the next county clerk may also refuse to issue a license, and the next, and the next. Using your logic, if Walmart hires an employee to work in the sporting goods section, it's alright for the employee to refuse to sell a gun to herdman since the employee has a religious belief of pacifism.

 

[sistersville]

Sister, you're a moron. No, not "most everyone" is saying good for her. She's in clear violation of the Constitution, the law, and a direct order from a judge. Plain and simple.[/QUOTE I should have said EVERYBODY i talked to said good for her. What is plain and simple is what God says marriage is

 

[riflearm2]

Rifle, bad analogy on the Muslim extremists. If she was shooting or beheading gay couples when they came in for a license you may have a point, but she's not.

Bad job reading once again on your part.

I didn't mention the murderers doing the action. I mentioned those who support and wish for those things to happen.

 

[riflearm2]

As far as the tweet about her four marriages, she is a fairly recent born again Christian. I don't know when her previous marriages occurred or ended. The woman appears to have a sincere belief, based on her religion, that she has to do what she is doing. The proper thing for her to do would be to stick to her beliefs and resign her position. However, her beliefs do not make her a cvnt.

She is an apolostic Christian. I have conveniently linked their official statement of faith. Please take particular note of #17, which reads, "17. Governmental authority is respected and obeyed."

Doh! I guess she is yet another example of a pick-and-choose Christian.

http://www.apostolicchristian.org/page.cfm?p=555

 

[herdit44]

If someone wanted to get married in Rowan County and they were gay and she wouldn't do it, why wouldn't they just drive 10 or 15 miles up the road to the next county and get the marriage license?

Problem solved.

except their tax dollars are going to pay her $80,000/year salary and to have those services in their county.

Also, to call her a cvnt goes straight to the issue I have with liberals. She has a different view than you so she is a piece of shite in your eyes.

she's a cvnt becuase she campaigned and accepted a job that require she uphold the laws of the united states and the commonwealth of kentucky, and she's no longer doing that, but still collecting her checks. as you said yourself, she should stick to her beliefs and resign, she shouldn't be collecting paychecks and not doing her job in a county where almost a quarter of the residents are below the poverty line. it has nothing to do with her beliefs, i disagree with her beliefs, but she's absolutely entitled to them. what she's not entitled to do is force them upon others in an official capacity as a representative of our government, and stop doing a large portion of her job. that's why she's a cvnt.

 

[herdit44]

also, i do find it ironic that liberals were called the "least tolerant people on the planet" for calling someone a bad name in a discussion of a conservative that is actively denying individuals their rights because she disagrees with their beliefs.

 

[extragreen]

She is an apolostic Christian. I have conveniently linked their official statement of faith. Please take particular note of #17, which reads, "17. Governmental authority is respected and obeyed."

Doh! I guess she is yet another example of a pick-and-choose Christian.

http://www.apostolicchristian.org/page.cfm?p=555

Do you hold anyone, other than a Christian, to a standard of perfection?

 

[riflearm2]

Do you hold anyone, other than a Christian, to a standard of perfection?

She is continuing to go against her own religious beliefs by not following the statement of faith. Instead of calling her out for this, your kind is defending her. Why?

Now, the rest of you Christians can go back to lumping all Muslims together and blaming the overwhelmingly majority of peaceful Muslims for the actions of the terrorists because they aren't doing enough to stop them.

 

[extragreen]

Do you hold anyone, other than a Christian, to a standard of perfection?

 

[i am herdman]

For that couple yes, but for the next one that goes to a courthouse expecting basic services it'll still be a problem.

Well, it will work itself out just maybe not on the schedule of the gay agenda.

That's some seriously malarkey.

Why? It solves their immediate need to get a license. Are they going to sit around and not get married because they won't drive 15 minutes up the road?

Are people really not getting their license when they could solve it in 30 minutes and drive to the next county while this thing is sorted out?

 

[i am herdman]

except their tax dollars are going to pay her $80,000/year salary and to have those services in their county.



she's a cvnt becuase she campaigned and accepted a job that require she uphold the laws of the united states and the commonwealth of kentucky, and she's no longer doing that, but still collecting her checks. as you said yourself, she should stick to her beliefs and resign, she shouldn't be collecting paychecks and not doing her job in a county where almost a quarter of the residents are below the poverty line. it has nothing to do with her beliefs, i disagree with her beliefs, but she's absolutely entitled to them. what she's not entitled to do is force them upon others in an official capacity as a representative of our government, and stop doing a large portion of her job. that's why she's a cvnt.

marriage licenses are one part of her duty, not her entire duty as a county clerk.

 

[i am herdman]

No, the malarkey is that the next county clerk may also refuse to issue a license, and the next, and the next. Using your logic, if Walmart hires an employee to work in the sporting goods section, it's alright for the employee to refuse to sell a gun to herdman since the employee has a religious belief of pacifism.

Well, that would be WalMarts right as a private institution

But, let's say they did do that. Am I going to sit around and sulk and not get my firearm? Or, am I going to go to another outlet for a firearm?

Hello.

 

[extragreen]

Well, it will work itself out just maybe not on the schedule of the gay agenda.




Why? It solves their immediate need to get a license. Are they going to sit around and not get married because they won't drive 15 minutes up the road?

Are people really not getting their license when they could solve it in 30 minutes and drive to the next county while this thing is sorted out?

I don't know if it's true everywhere, but in some places you have to get your marriage license in the county in which you reside. Plus, that they can go somewhere else to get their license is not the point. If someone wants to get married, they shouldn't have to call their local county clerk and ask if that clerk is abiding by the constitution and the oath of office they took.

 

[extragreen]

Well, that would be WalMarts right as a private institution

But, let's say they did do that. Am I going to sit around and sulk and not get my firearm? Or, am I going to go to another outlet for a firearm?

Hello.

And if that place of business is the only place you can purchase a gun, what are you going to do? I know the answer to that. You'd have a conniption.

 

[MichiganHerd]

I don't know if it's true everywhere, but in some places you have to get your marriage license in the county in which you reside.

I don't think you're right. I believe you have to acquire a license in the county in which you plan to marry. For example, if you wanted to marry down in the Smokey Mountains, you would have to have a license from Siever County, TN.

 

[herdit44]

marriage licenses are one part of her duty, not her entire duty as a county clerk.

so? it's part of her job, she's not doing it (for gays or straights). what would happen if you just stopped doing a significant part of your job?

 

[CockyHerd]

Classic separation of church and state......If she can't do her job based on the law, get someone who can.