At this point it is on the leadership at whatever that level it is to revive Marshall Football. It is their job and their duty to do so. If they won't go above them or remove them as well. I am to that point. The program is stale and stagnant. I just sat in the rain and watched Marshall, with a chance to win the division, lose to a team playing in a glorified high school stadium that just a few years ago didn't even have a program. In the near past that same team that just beat Marshall was playing the likes of Campbell(when they were non scholarship), Elon, other lower divisions and they were losing to them or struggling against them. The same Marshall program that has played football much longe and Heisman candidates, Top 10 ranking, many great players and championships.
It is Mike Hamrick's job to ensure the program is where it should be and it is not. If Mike Hamrick won't take care of it then it is Jerome Gilbert's job to do it or mandate Mike Hamrick to do it. If Gilbert won't do it, then it is the Board of Regents job to ensure it. The program is at that point.
We may get to a point that it is too far gone and we slip into eternal stagnation. The pseudo nepotism with the football program needs to end. We need a change at the top and that should happen now. If Mike Hamrick won't do it then he can go to for all I care. There are other athletic directors and football coaches out there.
The time has come to move on.
Wasn't he given multiple extensions. not just that extension? Next, he has coached for a long time. He is obviously known in the coaching ranks. He was never a coordinator even after coaching for a long time. He wasn't going anywhere and the extensions we so long and deep that it appears to have put the university in a financial bind.
Sorry, I'll be responding to 2 of your posts.
The problem with your initial post is, what sort of expectations will the fanbase realistically have if Hamrick does move onward?
Everything ever proposed has been met with criticism and that absolutely kills any positive thing MU does.
Despite they being a small contingent of dumbasses, wvu fans literally search for anything positive.
When they got curbstomped by LSU, they forgot the final score...being demolished on their home field, they talked about the statistics of the offense.
They lost to Bama, all they talked about was the score of "only losing by 10 points!!!" and how great they played.
Maybe thats the press being a bunch of wvu d*cklickers, but even fans who are barely literate, find things to embrace with that program.
MU its constantly finding things wrong with it. Not sure if its the depressed folks in this region or what, but anything positive seems to be spun to be negative.
Hell, it took demolishing Louisiana Tech for a thread complaining about the atmosphere (granted, we all know it can be fixed, but it gets dug up when MU wins a very big game). Does anyone think thats going to help the program?
It was argued MU should have been penalized for our kicker taking kicks after the whistle blew against WKU...and yes, there is a case for it, but thats BY FANS OF THE OTHER TEAM, NOT THEIR OWN!!!
I swear, if what happened on that non PI call during the Saints/Rams game last post-season, had happened against someone MU was playing, MU fans would actually discredit the win and I wouldn't be surprised if a few would write the officials saying, "you made the wrong call."
Vs.
Fans of the Rams saying, "screw it, they blew the call. We win. If he dies, he dies." Or wvu.
Even if there is truth to it, it doesn't help the program if everyone's always pointing out the baggage of it.
Some on this board would sell their wives and daughters to sex slave traders if it meant they could win an argument on here...they'll post "I hope I'm wrong" posts and then not admit they were wrong.
A few did when I called them out on it, but plenty doubted MU after MTSU.
Lets just say IF MU were granted inclusion into the AAC...and Hamrick said, we are hiring _____, who is a HC everyone is on board with.
But it required everyone to increase paying BG donations (and I'll not ask specifics, your economic contributions are your own) 300% minimum to do so.
How many of you would do it? How many of you would doubt MU's ability to compete despite knowing such an increase would give MU the funding?
How many of you would proclaim "lets just go back to the MAC, so we can pretend to give a crap about Eastern Michiga as much as we do about ODU."
I think Hamrick, for all his faults, has actually done well on what he says he's actually going to do. He built an IPF, he improved MU's sports medicine and student athlete footprint, he's secured funds to build a baseball facility...he has actually set a date to open it.
But if challenged, would MU fans do the same? Or are all these ideas just wishful thinking...online posters enjoying the mere idea of something as opposed to something actually being done...by them.
Ok to post 2.
Can you prove he wasn't approached by others?
I read he was given an extension to 2021 from the end of the 2014 season.
So a staffer having worked under Meyer and Rodriguez wasn't known? lol, ok.
Financial bind? We pay less than some conference mates pay...if thats the case, forget getting anyone who'll stay for more than a year.