Thanks trump
- Thread starter countryroads89
- Start date
We'll see what the future holds, but trade wars, tariffs, a "nationalistic" view and increasing national debt is not good for the stock market. This guy is a business idiot. He inherited the equivalent of $413 million and has declared bankruptcy six times. He can no longer get loans from US banks.
Works in reverse?
This thread says I lost $40k in the last month. I never attempted to claim a "long-term loss."
The thread about "coal coming back" appropriately compared coal production now to what the production was during Obama's term since you idiots said "Obama had a war on coal" and "trump was bringing coal back."
Let me know when US annual coal production reaches 1 billion tons again like it was in 2012 and 2014.
I love these threads where cuntry takes a monumental beat down and is exposed as the moron we know him to be
He actually embarrassed himself so badly over on his own site's forum, he finally stopped posting there.
I'm wondering why our forum math expert, english professor, grammy winning, star magnet genius doesn't call out this fool? Why does he give CR89 a pass?
Coal production for this year, so far, comes in 7th place of the last 8 years, and down from last year. But it's rising, right?
You of all people love to argue semantics and minor details, yet you continue to argue this? Oh, that's right, you only argue those things when they support your agenda.
No, not really.
This was a thread about Trump...not Obumma.
With that said, in the case of a debt deleveraging & market (monthly moves), like we saw in '08-'09 it matters more what the Fed Reserve does in response. Obumma is pretty lucky Bernanke and the Treasury responded in the way they did to pump liquidity back into the system.
Normally liberals like you bitch and complain about "obscene corporate profits".
Why the change in tune?
Read as "Trump does everything on his own, Negro did nothing on his own"....
Really, it's more like a centrist Republican nominated a centrist Republican (now independent) and the centrist Democrat kept him on because centrism is good...no thanks to the 18 Republicans that opposed his second term as chairman of the Fed.
But don't I remember you bitching about QE? "Why the change in tune?"
It's why you need to learn how to read. I've said, since Bush, that the market relies more on interest rates (fed policy) and corporate earnings (profits) long term. The economy also relies heavily on legislative actions and policy decisions. When all else fails, play the race card though. This seems to be your standard attempt at rebuttal these days. Come up with some new material.
QE as a normal Fed policy during avg times I am completely against. My main problem specifically with QE is if it is maintained for too long a period. It can have the ability to create a false sense of never ending rising markets and out of control inflation. The Fed continues to sell the assets it acquired, post crisis; in effect reducing levels of liquidity across the market (for buying/investing), and normalizing a policy that will most likely be needed again during the next deleveraging cycle. For me to be completely against QE, I would have to be completely against debt deleveraging or restructuring. Which I am not.
It's why I mocked guys like Ron Paul who claimed the fed reserve needed to be shut down because such a policy decision.
All DOW gains for 2018 wiped out...WINNING
https://amp-usatoday-com.cdn.amppro...lunge-again-wiping-out-gains-year/1754130002/
https://amp-usatoday-com.cdn.amppro...lunge-again-wiping-out-gains-year/1754130002/
