Trump campaign spied on
- Thread starter herdfan429
- Start date
WITCH HUNT.
I'm actually waiting for that debate. Trump vs whoever just repeating WITCH HUNT and FAKE NEWS.
I'm actually waiting for that debate. Trump vs whoever just repeating WITCH HUNT and FAKE NEWS.
I just wish both parties would stop having all these fvcked up investigations. Stop attempting to 'one-up' each other, and start working on the shit you were sent there to do. Neither party will support the opposing party's ideas, even if they 100% support it.
Thanks Barr, for confirming that we knew you were a trump cocksucker all along. Even more reason to provide Congress with the complete unredacted Mueller Report.
are you really this stupid or do you go into character to entertain this board?
Unredacted? Congrats. You've managed to out-dumb yourself. Do you seriously have any idea, at all, why this absolutely should not happen?
Congress has the appropriate security clearance. So explain it to me, dumbass who doesn’t know the difference between hoping and hopping.
A typo vs not having the slightest understanding why releasing the unredacted report would be a terrible idea - & I'm the dumbass. You really don't understand, do you? Do you think it should be released right this very moment? Completely unredacted? Just let the chips fall where they may?
I assume "spying" in this sense is the FBI trying to figure out why the Trump campaign met over 100 times with russians. Then there's the fact Trump was conducting business with Russia while running for President.
Some might consider that as the FBI doing their job. And please save the Hillary BS. At least the FBI kept it's Trump info quiet during the campaign - the same isn't true for Hillary.
In today's Senate hearing, Barr said he didn't go over his summary with Mueller? When asked if Mueller agreed with his summary, Barr said, "I don't know." What's the point of having an independent counsel if someone's going to change the final report's outcome? Everyone knows Mueller provided a summary for Congress....Barr submitted his own and tossed Mueller's. Why?
Bottom line: we're not going to be able to confirm if there was or was not collusion/obstruction until Congress sees the unredacted report. No, I don't believe a damned word any Trump employee says (how many have been convicted of lying?) - and Barr is an employee of Donald Jenius Trump....not the American taxpayer.
Some might consider that as the FBI doing their job. And please save the Hillary BS. At least the FBI kept it's Trump info quiet during the campaign - the same isn't true for Hillary.
In today's Senate hearing, Barr said he didn't go over his summary with Mueller? When asked if Mueller agreed with his summary, Barr said, "I don't know." What's the point of having an independent counsel if someone's going to change the final report's outcome? Everyone knows Mueller provided a summary for Congress....Barr submitted his own and tossed Mueller's. Why?
Bottom line: we're not going to be able to confirm if there was or was not collusion/obstruction until Congress sees the unredacted report. No, I don't believe a damned word any Trump employee says (how many have been convicted of lying?) - and Barr is an employee of Donald Jenius Trump....not the American taxpayer.
What benefit does Barr have in changing Muellers findings? Do you think if they were changed Mueller would just sit back and take it?
this sounds like someone that just doesn't want to hear and can't deal with the truth. you let the media and the DNC make you look foolish and continue to do so.
I don't believe Mueller has stood by. This investigation was renowned for no leaks....and last week one appeared in regard to Barr's interpretation via the NY Times. Mueller was under the direction of the justice dept....he's not going to hold a press conference. Plus, he knows through more pressure by congress, the truth should come out. Barr is in delay mode....he is Trump's lawyer.
When Buzzfeed completely made up a story Mueller didn't waste any time releasing a statement.
Mueller has known Barr since the late 1980's when they both worked in the GHWB Justice Department.
This idea that Barr is some Trump lackey is more than just ignorant, its dtard ignorant.
Mueller has known Barr since the late 1980's when they both worked in the GHWB Justice Department.
This idea that Barr is some Trump lackey is more than just ignorant, its dtard ignorant.
I suppose the "truth" is something coming from the mouth of a pathological liar.....someone who's made around 2000 lies or misleading statements since taking office.
your bias is impacting your ability to think objectively. I don't know you and there may be some other genetic reasons you have reduced cognitive abilities but in any case your heels are dug in. You will be disappointed over the next few years news cycle.
Hahahahaha. The third hand leak from people familiar with how other people think?!?! Come on now you should be better than that
we'll see when more details come to light. However, the facts should be the facts, not Barr's interpretation of the facts.
Says the guy that screamed trump collided with Russia for the last two years
Does that include Rosenstein (Mueller’s “boss”/DOJ) who also was employed by Obama?
Which “Trump employee” has been convicted of lying (for Trump)?
....and when Barr says he doesn't know if Mueller agrees with his summary? The guy who authored the report isn't consulted in what was reported to Congress? And now, I suppose, you're suggesting we should accept Barr's summary and future reports while he withholds/controls all the details.
This investigation should be treated the same as Whitewater and Nixon's. The facts are the facts....
Anyone who categorically believes statements from this administration is a fool.
I don't know....Cohen and Manafort? Seems I've seen their names in the news a lot. We can toss in Flynn too. There are more.... feel free to research for yourself.
Hopefully, Rosenstein includes supporting documentation with his claims. Do I believe him or Obama without "proof"? Nope.
well, both sides have been screaming....on the right it was "there's no evidence of collusion"...which became "collusion isn't a crime."
Look, I've stated here a few times, I'll accept whatever the investigation says.....but I'm not buying Barr's interpretation.
apparently, you missed the part where barr indicated that what he reported in this summary regarding collusion and obstruction were basically direct quotes from mueller's report.
you and the rest of libs are merely holding out hope there's something that you can hang your hat on so you won't have to admit how much of an idiot you've been for pushing the russian narrative over the past two years, and, even moreso, your hopes of getting rid of 'orange man bad' aren't dashed.
and, no, you, nor the rest of the mentally deranged crybaby ass hurt libs will "accept whatever the investigation says".
So, when Barr testified he doesnt know if Mueller agrees with his summary....
I'll wait for the Mueller version.
But you can feel free to believe whatever Trump and his staff say. They've been so f'n credible.
thank you for proving my point. you don't want truth, you are too biased and have been a useful idiot of the press and DNC for too long.
are you so obtuse, that you don't realize that Barr's quotes of Mueller have to be accurate, otherwise they would have tried to indict Trump. Given the fact most prosecutors would indict a ham sandwich and they spent to years looking for a crime (contrary to SC statute there should have been crime before SC appointed and when I say crime I don't mean Comey's illegal leaks) there wasn't even a weak case to try for indictment or try to prosecute.
at this point, the dems are looking for any detail in the report where they can use for political reasons to continue to manipulate and bamboozle the ignorant masses (you and your ilk)
the above is pretty appropriate considering my post was about Trump's believability.
Barr is on record saying the President can't be guilty of obstruction. If that's his position, why would anyone expect an indictment? Why do you think he got the job?
Again, the report should be the information source....Not Barr's interpretation.
many (most) legal scholars would say a President can't be obstructing for exercising his powers given to him by the constitution. case and point, the investigation continued and was even elevated to a SC appointment after Comey fired.
what you should be asking yourself is why did Mueller leave that part up to the AG and Rod R., the answer is he had nothing and he is likely trying to save his good name after this hoax has been played on American people (and it appears is still being played on you). bottom line, Mueller had to know for the better part of two years that there is nothing here and that it is a bogus investigation anyway, yet he continued to try and take down a rightfully elected US President.
the only question is, will Mueller and his name go down in the mud of history like several others involved in this fraud are about too...……...
you can cry about trump's believability all you want. not like it's ground shaking news and yore the first to cry about it. at the end of the day, why can't you just admit it, yore holding out hope there's some sort of grounds in the report for impeachment. why can't you mentally deranged cocksuckers just admit what everybody knows?
i honestly believe yore going to be sorely disappointed....but never fear, the msm and your reps will come up with yet another narrative to help you hate the orange man bad even that much more.
The most honest statement you’ve written yet. Should have stopped there.
No one you mentioned was an employee of Trump. Flynn & Manafort?? Pffft. Bahahahaha.
What lies were they convicted of while working for Trump?
