ADVERTISEMENT

Trump on Columbus Day

The internet, where an assistant football coach at a division 2 or 3 school can tell a practicing, successful attorney that he’s not intelligence, while fabricating a story that he attended a tier 3 law school.

Rifle, the reason you think you’re the smartest guy in the room is because this forum is your life. While some may spend 10-15 minutes a day on here, you’ll stay up to 3am writing a 60,000 word response to someone who questioned your claims of unverifiable success. The 15+ pictures of your different types of jeans was my personal favorite. The fact that you took the time to upload those pics to defend yourself may have been the best moment in this board’s history.

You comb through posts looking for spelling and grammatical errors when people don’t even care to proofread what they wrote. Then when called out for your errors, you just wear people down with more multiple thousand word replies that no one even reads.

How does someone so “successful” have as much time to post here as you do?

I particularly like the fact that he gets so involved in these threads because he can't help it - his ego won't let him bow out gracefully - while those engaging him do it for the sheer pleasure of watching him get so bent out of shape over it. It's entertaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
How does someone so “successful” have as much time to post here as you do?

It's quite simple. It's the same reason why, years ago, I said that I didn't have to work another day in my life if I so choose and can still have a more comfortable life than the majority of people on here. Refer back to the royalty statement picture of just this year's records for a better understanding.

It's why I can stay in bed until 1 pm, why I can go to the movies every day, why I can spend two hours working out/hiking, why I can mock your lack of intelligence extensively on here, why I can choose what position I do/don't accept without worries about needing a paycheck . . .

The fact that you asked that question shows just how much you lack in intelligence. Somebody "so successful" would have the ability to take whatever time they wanted on a message board . . . or meeting with people to discuss meeting again with people over cars & coffee. Sell some more insurance, and perhaps, you too can reach that level with the assistance of your wife's income.

You comb through posts looking for spelling and grammatical errors

I don't have to comb through anything. It's very easy for the educated to see errors - not typing errors - when the person simply lacks the intelligence to know the proper way (such as the conditionals you screwed up a few days ago).

The internet, where an assistant football coach at a division 2 or 3 school can tell a practicing, successful attorney that he’s not intelligence, while fabricating a story that he attended a tier 3 law school.

Oh, you're back to lying again - good little deplorable you are.

Tier Three was adamant that he is NOT a tier three grad. He is clearly a grad from a school on the bubble of tier 2 and tier 3 (proof seen by him arguing there is no such thing as a "bubble ranking" tier 2 and 3 law schools, showing he lacks the intelligence to know what "bubble" refers to).

"In vitro" isn't hyphenated.

It is perfectly acceptable to hyphenate it. I posted other sources hyphenating it and stating that is is acceptable to hyphenate it.

By the way, the italics thing, when it even applies, only does so in the context of journals and research papers. So, you're wrong in that respect as well since this forum is neither.


This is just more proof that you aren't very bright. You first claimed that "in vitro" isn't hyphenated. Then, in a subsequent post, you claim that it is hyphenated.

Not in the links I posted.

Well, no shit. You aren't going to purposely post links that show I am correct. Christ, what type of law do you practice? Your arguments are some of the worst that are regularly seen around here.
 
@Y.A.G Si Ye Nots am I reading you correct in that you're fine with aborting a baby that is perfectly healthy, no matter how far along the pregnancy, as long as it's aborted prior to birth?

That's correct. I am not personally comfortable with it, but my comfort should not be the determining factor for what other living humans are allowed to do. I understand that you big government Republicans don't agree.
 
It's quite simple. It's the same reason why, years ago, I said that I didn't have to work another day in my life if I so choose and can still have a more comfortable life than the majority of people on here. Refer back to the royalty statement picture of just this year's records for a better understanding.

It's why I can stay in bed until 1 pm, why I can go to the movies every day, why I can spend two hours working out/hiking, why I can mock your lack of intelligence extensively on here, why I can choose what position I do/don't accept without worries about needing a paycheck . . .

The fact that you asked that question shows just how much you lack in intelligence. Somebody "so successful" would have the ability to take whatever time they wanted on a message board . . . or meeting with people to discuss meeting again with people over cars & coffee. Sell some more insurance, and perhaps, you too can reach that level with the assistance of your wife's income.



I don't have to comb through anything. It's very easy for the educated to see errors - not typing errors - when the person simply lacks the intelligence to know the proper way (such as the conditionals you screwed up a few days ago).



Oh, you're back to lying again - good little deplorable you are.

Tier Three was adamant that he is NOT a tier three grad. He is clearly a grad from a school on the bubble of tier 2 and tier 3 (proof seen by him arguing there is no such thing as a "bubble ranking" tier 2 and 3 law schools, showing he lacks the intelligence to know what "bubble" refers to).



It is perfectly acceptable to hyphenate it. I posted other sources hyphenating it and stating that is is acceptable to hyphenate it.




This is just more proof that you aren't very bright. You first claimed that "in vitro" isn't hyphenated. Then, in a subsequent post, you claim that it is hyphenated.



Well, no shit. You aren't going to purposely post links that show I am correct. Christ, what type of law do you practice? Your arguments are some of the worst that are regularly seen around here.

Dude, you sent me a Facebook message only a few months ago talking about wanting to get an E Class or used Maserati to impress chicks. Don’t come on here talking about how rich you are. And you’re definitely fighting a losing fight if you think leisure time is a measurement of success.

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t claim to be a big time music producer and also a full time assistant football coach and also have 23 hours of leisure a day while also finding the time to respond to every post on Herd Nation with a 50,000 word response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
This is just more proof that you aren't very bright. You first claimed that "in vitro" isn't hyphenated. Then, in a subsequent post, you claim that it is hyphenated.

Now you're just making sh*t up. Where did I admit to it being hyphenated? Bottom line, it's not hyphenated, unless you're a dumba$$, like yourself. In addition, it's generally not italicized. The only - ONLY -time it is acceptable to italicize it is if it's being written about in the context of a scientific/medical journal or research paper - and even then it is not the preferred method.

Also, I like how you keep avoiding how wrong and ignorant your italicization argument was in the context of the dictionary link.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
watching him get so bent out of shape over it. It's entertaining.

I enjoy mocking people who claim that I am wrong about something. That's entertaining for me. Don't confuse my enjoyment over exposing you as being a tier three as me getting bent out of shape.

Dude, you sent me a Facebook message only a few months ago talking about wanting to get an E Class or used Maserati
.

Only a few months ago? I bought the Maserati over six months ago, and that discussion was before I made a decision, so clearly it was well over a "few months ago" . . . more like 7-8 months ago.

Don’t come on here talking about how rich you are.

When do I ever come on here saying that? In fact, I have said just the opposite. I don't consider myself rich. That doesn't change the fact that I don't have to work another day in my life if I choose not to and still live a more comfortable life than the majority. With a 3 bedroom/3 bath condo with no mortgage, I can rent that out (as it is now), use that money, and only need an additional $1000 more per month to live on for another place, a car, food, gas, etc. You realize how little that is over 30 years, not even counting royalty payments I am owed in perpetuity?

And, yes, I went with the one year old, 11,000 mile used Maserati (that had worn out brake pads already) over the new $57,000 E Class Mercedes . . . as my third car at the time. Your argument is that means somebody wouldn't be "rich" based on a commoner's opinion?

And you’re definitely fighting a losing fight if you think leisure time is a measurement of success.

Hardly.

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t claim to be a big time music producer and also a full time assistant football coach and also have 23 hours of leisure a day while also finding the time to respond to every post on Herd Nation with a 50,000 word response.

Sure I can. Not only can I "claim" it, but I can also actually live those things.

Just how much time do you think it takes to be a music producer? You think producers - whether it is JR Rotem, Mike Will, nineteen85, The Runners, Scott Storch, Justice League, etc. - work 9-5 five days a week? You can get a beat created by somebody else, spend two hours putting a layer or different drum kit on it, send it back and be done with it, and get co-production credit on it.

A full-time assistant coach will be really busy during 2-3 hours of practice, busy during 2-3 hours of film (with numerous breaks in between, plenty of time to read the internet during film, etc), and another 1-3 hours in position meetings/recruiting/staff meetings. That is a maximum of 9 hours of true work. Now, the day may extend 18 hours, but that is because the culture and history of coaching has incorrectly taught staffs that to be successful you must sit in your office until midnight each night and arrive at 6 am the next morning. It's bogus.

That leaves plenty of time to read and mock morons like you for making foolish arguments on a message board . . . especially when I don't have to take my children to school, meet the wife for lunch, run home for dinner with the family before going back for a staff meeting at night, etc.
 
i gotta say, if my dog and greed were both hanging from a cliff and i had to save one, i'd let poor ole buster go and pull greed up to safety . . . because i'd like for him to be in pain on the way down. i'd pull him to safety, kick him in the nuts, then push him off the damn cliff.

If God told me my dog was going to die unless I murdered all of you, you all are going to be some dead motherfvckers. And I will also kick each of you in the nuts before I pull the trigger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
Now you're just making sh*t up. Where did I admit to it being hyphenated? Bottom line, it's not hyphenated, unless you're a dumba$$, like yourself. In addition, it's generally not italicized. The only - ONLY -time it is acceptable to italicize it is if it's being written about in the context of a scientific/medical journal or research paper - and even then it is not the preferred method.

Also, I like how you keep avoiding how wrong and ignorant your italicization argument was in the context of the dictionary link.

Lets dumb this down to a tier three level:

1) Do you agree that Latin words are acceptable to be italicized?
2) Do you agree that if you don't italicize, then you should hyphenate?
 
You better get used to such things.

Yeah, it also had something with the underfloor fuel pipes (warranty covered), something that required "fuses, tape, and zip tie" (warranty covered), the tunnel glove box lid not fully opening when the button is pushed (they fixed it), and oil leaking from the DX turbo drain which ended up needing a replaced "drain o-ring on block side and repaired intake clip" which totaled $92.50 which they covered.

Seems like a lot for a car with so few miles, but my guess (and the dealer's) is that the previous owner used it on a track which is why the pads were gone already.
 
That's correct. I am not personally comfortable with it, but my comfort should not be the determining factor for what other living humans are allowed to do. I understand that you big government Republicans don't agree.
too fvcking bad more people with that ideology wasn't aborted. i'm pro choice, but with limits. once the baby is past the first two weeks, unless there's some life threatening complication, hell no. you want pro choice, make the choice prior to the baby forming. once the choice to keep a baby is made and after the first two weeks of prego, it's murder.

people okay with the abortion of a 9 month old baby should be shot in the head because they're more brain dead than the said aborted baby.
 
Yeah, it also had something with the underfloor fuel pipes (warranty covered), something that required "fuses, tape, and zip tie" (warranty covered), the tunnel glove box lid not fully opening when the button is pushed (they fixed it), and oil leaking from the DX turbo drain which ended up needing a replaced "drain o-ring on block side and repaired intake clip" which totaled $92.50 which they covered.

Seems like a lot for a car with so few miles, but my guess (and the dealer's) is that the previous owner used it on a track which is why the pads were gone already.

Just drive it like it was meant to be driven and it will eat pads and tires.

What is a DX turbo drain? Something they made up to charge you for?
 
too fvcking bad more people with that ideology wasn't aborted. i'm pro choice, but with limits. once the baby is past the first two weeks, unless there's some life threatening complication, hell no. you want pro choice, make the choice prior to the baby forming. once the choice to keep a baby is made and after the first two weeks of prego, it's murder.

people okay with the abortion of a 9 month old baby should be shot in the head because they're more brain dead than the said aborted baby.

Two weeks?! I'd guess that most people don't even know they're pregnant within the first two weeks. What is it that makes the cutoff point two weeks for you?

Just drive it like it was meant to be driven and it will eat pads and tires.

What is a DX turbo drain? Something they made up to charge you for?

You're asking the wrong guy; other than how they look and what earns me more head, I don't know shit about cars. I paid $300 to have an independent garage do a pre-sale inspection on it (the second vehicle in a row). A guy at the dealership actually urged me to get one done after I put down my deposit on the car. The dealership agreed to fix any problems on their dime that were discovered and then send it back to the garage of my choosing to verify.

It's the standard at that dealership. That and another dealership are owned by a Middle Eastern group. Something like 90% of their vehicles are purchased by customers unseen. They have the vehicles sent to an independent garage for a pre-sale inspection, the dealership fixes anything, and then the vehicle is shipped without the customer ever having test driven it.
 
Lets dumb this down to a tier three level:

1) Do you agree that Latin words are acceptable to be italicized?
2) Do you agree that if you don't italicize, then you should hyphenate?

1. Acceptable? Yes. Required or preferred? No.
2. No, and neither does anyone else (see the links posted above) that isn't completely full of $hit.

This has officially ventured into "g wagon" territory.

Oh, and it's "let's," not "lets."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88 and murox
Two weeks?! I'd guess that most people don't even know they're pregnant within the first two weeks. What is it that makes the cutoff point two weeks for you?
development of various organs shortly thereafter. i'm not stuck on two weeks, though, and definitely understand the argument you pose, even thought of that after i posted "2 weeks". however, after months, no way. my belief in pro choice is the individual's ability to make the choice long before that point.

i do, however, believe different circumstances have a bearing on whether to abort or not to abort at any given point of the pregnancy. and, unless i'm totally blinded from living the dreamy life of bum fvck egypt, i really don't see where abortion is a huge issue, at least as set forth with the parameters that i tend to believe make sense, i.e. i never hear of women who are a month or more preggo getting an abortion. not saying it never happens, but it's not the norm.
 
1. Acceptable? Yes. Required or preferred? No.
2. No, and neither does anyone else (see the links posted above) that isn't completely full of $hit.

This has officially ventured into "g wagon" territory.

Oh, and it's "let's," not "lets."

Eventually you just have to stop responding, because he won't. Everyone knows who won that round, no matter who gets the last word.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mlblack16.
You're asking the wrong guy; other than how they look and what earns me more head, I don't know shit about cars. I paid $300 to have an independent garage do a pre-sale inspection on it (the second vehicle in a row). A guy at the dealership actually urged me to get one done after I put down my deposit on the car. The dealership agreed to fix any problems on their dime that were discovered and then send it back to the garage of my choosing to verify.

It's the standard at that dealership. That and another dealership are owned by a Middle Eastern group. Something like 90% of their vehicles are purchased by customers unseen. They have the vehicles sent to an independent garage for a pre-sale inspection, the dealership fixes anything, and then the vehicle is shipped without the customer ever having test driven it.

Well yeah, PPI any car you buy sight unseen, and PPI anything more complicated than a 1980 Chevy.

Last people I would buy a semi-exotic from is some Arab independent dealer. I would look for a private seller. It's a little late for that advice now lol.
 
I enjoy mocking people who claim that I am wrong about something. That's entertaining for me. Don't confuse my enjoyment over exposing you as being a tier three as me getting bent out of shape.



Only a few months ago? I bought the Maserati over six months ago, and that discussion was before I made a decision, so clearly it was well over a "few months ago" . . . more like 7-8 months ago.



When do I ever come on here saying that? In fact, I have said just the opposite. I don't consider myself rich. That doesn't change the fact that I don't have to work another day in my life if I choose not to and still live a more comfortable life than the majority. With a 3 bedroom/3 bath condo with no mortgage, I can rent that out (as it is now), use that money, and only need an additional $1000 more per month to live on for another place, a car, food, gas, etc. You realize how little that is over 30 years, not even counting royalty payments I am owed in perpetuity?

And, yes, I went with the one year old, 11,000 mile used Maserati (that had worn out brake pads already) over the new $57,000 E Class Mercedes . . . as my third car at the time. Your argument is that means somebody wouldn't be "rich" based on a commoner's opinion?



Hardly.



Sure I can. Not only can I "claim" it, but I can also actually live those things.

Just how much time do you think it takes to be a music producer? You think producers - whether it is JR Rotem, Mike Will, nineteen85, The Runners, Scott Storch, Justice League, etc. - work 9-5 five days a week? You can get a beat created by somebody else, spend two hours putting a layer or different drum kit on it, send it back and be done with it, and get co-production credit on it.

A full-time assistant coach will be really busy during 2-3 hours of practice, busy during 2-3 hours of film (with numerous breaks in between, plenty of time to read the internet during film, etc), and another 1-3 hours in position meetings/recruiting/staff meetings. That is a maximum of 9 hours of true work. Now, the day may extend 18 hours, but that is because the culture and history of coaching has incorrectly taught staffs that to be successful you must sit in your office until midnight each night and arrive at 6 am the next morning. It's bogus.

That leaves plenty of time to read and mock morons like you for making foolish arguments on a message board . . . especially when I don't have to take my children to school, meet the wife for lunch, run home for dinner with the family before going back for a staff meeting at night, etc.

Based on a "commoner's opinion"? I'm not even sure what you're trying to say here. I'm saying rich people don't buy E Classes to impress people, which was your stated reason for considering one -- especially one that costs $57k and has no options. You'd have been better off buying a C Class with more options. Still no one would be impressed, but at least you wouldn't have vinyl seats in your "luxury" car.

You also misunderstood my argument about leisure. I agree leisure is a good -- although not absolute -- measure of success. I'm saying you don't have nearly as much leisure time as I do, and your argument that you can sleep to 1pm or stay up late falls on deaf ears here. I could too, I just choose to be more productive with my day. Also, if you're working a minimum of a 5 hour day, how could you possibly sleep 'til 1pm? Your boss isn't letting you come in at 2pm, or go to a movie in the middle of a day.

Speaking of producers, do you know what all the music producers you named have in common? When you google their name, their music credits show up. They have mentions on social media. There are pictures of them with actual music artists not from 2004. Not grainy bigfoot video of the time they met Tom Green.
 
When you google their name, their music credits show up. They have mentions on social media. There are pictures of them with actual music artists not from 2004. Not grainy bigfoot video of the time they met Tom Green.

Apparently he used the same alias as he did for his coaching gig, because he mysteriously doesn't show up on any Div I-AA football team coaching staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88 and murox
i never hear of women who are a month or more preggo getting an abortion. not saying it never happens, but it's not the norm.

Yeah, that's probably a result of living in Cairo.
63% of abortions happen after seven weeks according to this:
http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

Per your organ limitation . . . any particular organs that make it your cut-off point? A soon-to-be-realistic hypothetical: when (allowed) science is able to create individual organs from stem cell, are you against them cultivating a lung/heart/kidney for transplant recipients? Now, they wouldn't cultivate a full fetus, remove something, and then off the fetus . . . stem cell would allow them to only grow or cultivate individual organs.

Are you good with that?

1. Acceptable? Yes. Required or preferred? No.
2. No, and neither does anyone else (see the links posted above) that isn't completely full of $hit.

You have people in a grammar forum stating that medical books have used "in-vitro." You have people in a grammar forum stating that you hyphenate if you don't put it in italics. You have a person (that would be me) who knows more about grammar and very little known rules than anyone you've met, yet you're not believing any of those. Tier Threed!


This has officially ventured into "g wagon" territory.

Oh, you mean Murox's argument where he said no reputable source called it "G wagon," then when I linked him to one stating that both "G wagon" and "G wagen" are used, he hid from it. Or do you mean the argument where Murox told me to just look at the Mercedes website for proof of "G wagen," yet it was nowhere to be found and he has yet to show anywhere on the Mercedes site where that is the spelling. Yep. Tier Threed!

Oh, and it's "let's," not "lets."

Yes, we went over that on here with Herdman over the last two weeks. Go ahead and break out your iPhone or iPad. Type "let's." Then type some random words before it and try typing it again. Apple products will try guessing which one you wanted to type and sometimes make it a contraction and sometimes take it away even when you type it.
 
Last people I would buy a semi-exotic from is some Arab independent dealer. I would look for a private seller. It's a little late for that advice now lol.

It's a holding group. They own that big dealership (sell an absurd amount of cars per day), they own an actual Maserati dealership in the same city, and I recall them owning a bunch of other stuff. They aren't out looking for a quick buck. They are established.

Based on a "commoner's opinion"? I'm not even sure what you're trying to say here. I'm saying rich people don't buy E Classes to impress people, which was your stated reason for considering one -- especially one that costs $57k and has no options. You'd have been better off buying a C Class with more options. Still no one would be impressed, but at least you wouldn't have vinyl seats in your "luxury" car.

My stated reason wasn't to "impress people." For the Maserati, I said girls around here will drop their pants in one easily. It was clearly a secondary reason, and I am sure if we both revisit that discussion you'll see that.

Further, I continue to tell you I don't say I am rich. I said that to a commoner, a person spending $57K (Mercedes) - $65K (Maserati) on a third vehicle would be considered that.

And your claim that a $57K 2018 Mercedes wouldn't have leather or additional options continues to show just how clueless you are. It had leather, the panoramic roof, wood/leather steering wheel, and a couple of other options at that price.

I'm saying you don't have nearly as much leisure time as I do,

And once again, you'd be wrong. See, you continue to showcase your stupidity by making assumptions on things that you have no idea about. Just where do you think I am coaching? You keep saying D2/D3/high school.

Speaking of producers, do you know what all the music producers you named have in common? When you google their name, their music credits show up. They have mentions on social media.
.

All of them also want their names places, something I have made a point and spent money not to have. That's why they use their real (legal) names, and I don't. That's why most of them have never ghosted and kept all of their credits while I have taken bigger pay upfront many times.

There are pictures of them with actual music artists not from 2004. Not grainy bigfoot video of the time they met Tom Green.

For somebody who has access to my Facebook and/or Instragram which shows hundreds - literally hundreds - of pictures with artists over the last few years, that's as dumb an argument as you've ever made . . . and you've made some pretty dumb ones!

Apparently he used the same alias as he did for his coaching gig, because he mysteriously doesn't show up on any Div I-AA football team coaching staff.

Not sure why I would considering I am not an FCS. You guys love to run with assumptions. So far it has been a D2, D3, high school, and now an FCS.
 
Anyway...that Christopher C was sure hard on the indigenous people.
Yehh but, he couldn't spell, didn't know proper Latin, and the dumb ass bought a used E Class. Lazy bastard only worked 8 hours a day. Probably would have conquered the world and not lucked into finding a land mass if he would have had any drive. Too bad old Chris was before the Puritan's because they would have taught him a thing or two about work ethic. And, who in the hell pays to have their oil changed? Can't even change his own oil. Probably wore skinny jeans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
It's a holding group. They own that big dealership (sell an absurd amount of cars per day), they own an actual Maserati dealership in the same city, and I recall them owning a bunch of other stuff. They aren't out looking for a quick buck. They are established.



My stated reason wasn't to "impress people." For the Maserati, I said girls around here will drop their pants in one easily. It was clearly a secondary reason, and I am sure if we both revisit that discussion you'll see that.

Further, I continue to tell you I don't say I am rich. I said that to a commoner, a person spending $57K (Mercedes) - $65K (Maserati) on a third vehicle would be considered that.

And your claim that a $57K 2018 Mercedes wouldn't have leather or additional options continues to show just how clueless you are. It had leather, the panoramic roof, wood/leather steering wheel, and a couple of other options at that price.



And once again, you'd be wrong. See, you continue to showcase your stupidity by making assumptions on things that you have no idea about. Just where do you think I am coaching? You keep saying D2/D3/high school.



All of them also want their names places, something I have made a point and spent money not to have. That's why they use their real (legal) names, and I don't. That's why most of them have never ghosted and kept all of their credits while I have taken bigger pay upfront many times.



For somebody who has access to my Facebook and/or Instragram which shows hundreds - literally hundreds - of pictures with artists over the last few years, that's as dumb an argument as you've ever made . . . and you've made some pretty dumb ones!



Not sure why I would considering I am not an FCS. You guys love to run with assumptions. So far it has been a D2, D3, high school, and now an FCS.

How clueless I am? I've bought 5 Mercedes in the last 6-7 years, including an E Class. I know how much they cost and what their options are. If you got a base E300 (cheapest E you can buy) and put only two options on it (leather seats and wood steering wheel) it would be $57,000. Honda Civics would be better equipped. The only person who would buy that car would be someone who is trying to impress people that they have a Mercedes. That is what cab drivers in Europe drive.

As for where you coach, I don't actually think you coach anywhere at the moment. If you did your name would be on their athletics website.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Oh, you mean Murox's argument where he said no reputable source called it "G wagon," then when I linked him to one stating that both "G wagon" and "G wagen" are used, he hid from it. Or do you mean the argument where Murox told me to just look at the Mercedes website for proof of "G wagen," yet it was nowhere to be found and he has yet to show anywhere on the Mercedes site where that is the spelling. Yep. Tier Threed!

I can't believe you're still carrying on about this after looking like a fool. I didn't hide from anything; your source was not credible. For the 100th time, G Wagen is short for Gelandewagen. Mercedes refers to it as the G Class, like all of its other models. Why would anyone abbreviate it "G Wagon"? Sure, you can find examples of it used incorrectly online, but that doesn't prove you right. Besides, the entire argument was about you hilariously calling me out thinking I was wrong for referring to it as a G Wagen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_G-Class

https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/18/17475192/mercedes-benz-g-wagen-2019-first-drive

https://autoweek.com/article/people/man-who-saved-g-wagen

https://www.caranddriver.com/mercedes-benz/g-class

https://www.motortrend.com/cars/mer...019-mercedes-benz-g-class-first-drive-review/
 
How clueless I am? I've bought 5 Mercedes in the last 6-7 years, including an E Class. I know how much they cost and what their options are. If you got a base E300 (cheapest E you can buy) and put only two options on it (leather seats and wood steering wheel) it would be $57,000. Honda Civics would be better equipped. The only person who would buy that car would be someone who is trying to impress people that they have a Mercedes. That is what cab drivers in Europe drive.

As for where you coach, I don't actually think you coach anywhere at the moment. If you did your name would be on their athletics website.
Honda Civic is probably the better car.

That should keep the thread going.
 
How clueless I am? I've bought 5 Mercedes in the last 6-7 years, including an E Class. I know how much they cost and what their options are. If you got a base E300 (cheapest E you can buy) and put only two options on it (leather seats and wood steering wheel) it would be $57,000.
.


Wait a minute. Earlier in this thread, you said an E class for $57K would have no options and vinyl instead of leather. Now, you're saying an E class for that much would have leather and wood steering wheel. So yes, clueless is accurate.

In reality, as I already mentioned, the $57K included the panoramic moon roof, leather, heated steering wheel, and wood/leather steering wheel. I am sure there were other small options, but I can't remember them. And that was the sticker price before any negotiating for one of the cars they already had on the lot, which means that $57K price would easily drop.

But I went ahead and built one on the Mercedes website (ya' know, the same site you claimed referred to it as "G-wagen," but you've since ran from).

Base MSRP: 52,950
Panoramic: 1000
Leather: 1620
Soft close doors: 550
Warmth & Comfort Package (heated steering wheel, rapid seat heaters, heated front armrests and upper door panels, galvanized shift paddles): 1050
Rear spoiler: 350
Chrome door handle inserts: 100
Black mirror housing: 250

All of those options, and you're still in the $57-thousands.

But tell us again how you're not clueless by saying that $57K for an E class gets you no options and vinyl.

The only person who would buy that car would be someone who is trying to impress people that they have a Mercedes. That is what cab drivers in Europe drive.
.

Or clearly, you and/or your wife since you said you have recently bought one. Oh, but you had the twin 5-spoke wheels, so your argument is that it's different.

As for where you coach, I don't actually think you coach anywhere at the moment.

This is where you just can't stop tripping over yourself. You just claimed that you had more "leisure time" than I do. Yet now you're claiming that I don't coach anywhere. So are you saying that not only am I not coaching anywhere, but I am employed doing something else? If you're not saying that, then how the hell do you claim to have more "leisure time" than a guy who doesn't work? See how foolish you continue to look?

If you did your name would be on their athletics website.

Yep, just like last year when nobody could find it (outside of a couple on here), huh? Just like the first nine months of 2016 when nobody could find it, until they suddenly could, huh?


I didn't hide from anything;

Yes, you did. Your argument was that it says "G wagen" on the Mercedes website. You even told me to go look for myself. Well, I did, and it was nowhere on there. Are you going to admit you fabricated more shit or are you going to hide from this again?

; your source was not credible.

Oh? Business Insider is not credible, but Wikipedia is? Gear Patrol is not credible, but The Verge is?

https://www.businessinsider.com/mercedes-benz-g-wagon-g-class-pictures-details-2017-12

https://gearpatrol.com/2018/05/25/mercedes-g-class-review/

Hell, the latter even goes out of its way to show that it is referred to by both spellings.

Besides, the entire argument was about you hilariously calling me out thinking I was wrong for referring to it as a G Wagen

You act like that is such a stretch. Hell, you don't even know when to use were vs. was. It's a very common mistake with conditionals, and of course it is even more common with West Virginians, but I wouldn't expect you to not know the difference and mess it up twice within a short period of time. You butchered spelling of words by using common misspellings. It isn't a stretch to assume you made yet another grammar error.
 
Wait a minute. Earlier in this thread, you said an E class for $57K would have no options and vinyl instead of leather. Now, you're saying an E class for that much would have leather and wood steering wheel. So yes, clueless is accurate.

In reality, as I already mentioned, the $57K included the panoramic moon roof, leather, heated steering wheel, and wood/leather steering wheel. I am sure there were other small options, but I can't remember them. And that was the sticker price before any negotiating for one of the cars they already had on the lot, which means that $57K price would easily drop.

But I went ahead and built one on the Mercedes website (ya' know, the same site you claimed referred to it as "G-wagen," but you've since ran from).

Base MSRP: 52,950
Panoramic: 1000
Leather: 1620
Soft close doors: 550
Warmth & Comfort Package (heated steering wheel, rapid seat heaters, heated front armrests and upper door panels, galvanized shift paddles): 1050
Rear spoiler: 350
Chrome door handle inserts: 100
Black mirror housing: 250

All of those options, and you're still in the $57-thousands.

But tell us again how you're not clueless by saying that $57K for an E class gets you no options and vinyl.



Or clearly, you and/or your wife since you said you have recently bought one. Oh, but you had the twin 5-spoke wheels, so your argument is that it's different.



This is where you just can't stop tripping over yourself. You just claimed that you had more "leisure time" than I do. Yet now you're claiming that I don't coach anywhere. So are you saying that not only am I not coaching anywhere, but I am employed doing something else? If you're not saying that, then how the hell do you claim to have more "leisure time" than a guy who doesn't work? See how foolish you continue to look?



Yep, just like last year when nobody could find it (outside of a couple on here), huh? Just like the first nine months of 2016 when nobody could find it, until they suddenly could, huh?




Yes, you did. Your argument was that it says "G wagen" on the Mercedes website. You even told me to go look for myself. Well, I did, and it was nowhere on there. Are you going to admit you fabricated more shit or are you going to hide from this again?



Oh? Business Insider is not credible, but Wikipedia is? Gear Patrol is not credible, but The Verge is?

https://www.businessinsider.com/mercedes-benz-g-wagon-g-class-pictures-details-2017-12

https://gearpatrol.com/2018/05/25/mercedes-g-class-review/

Hell, the latter even goes out of its way to show that it is referred to by both spellings.



You act like that is such a stretch. Hell, you don't even know when to use were vs. was. It's a very common mistake with conditionals, and of course it is even more common with West Virginians, but I wouldn't expect you to not know the difference and mess it up twice within a short period of time. You butchered spelling of words by using common misspellings. It isn't a stretch to assume you made yet another grammar error.

So, again, you were going to buy a base E 300 with shitty wheels and barely any options so you could "impress chicks." And chrome door inserts? haha Also, for the record, I had an E 550 in 2011. That's the one with a real engine. There's a huge difference between an E 300 and an E 550. It's like the difference between your "mom's" Altima and your Maserati.

Also, you can option an E 300 out to nearly $85,000 (even with that shitty engine). So yeah, a $57k version barely has any options at all.

And yes, even if you don't coach at a college program, you still have a job. You work for someone. I don't have a job. I own multiple businesses that mostly run themselves now. I may work an hour a day at most. If you don't believe me, you can ask big country, he will tell you.

And for fvck's sake, you're still holding on to the G Wagon disaster argument. This is embarrassing for you. Gelandewagen. Read that word. How is this difficult for you? Do you see the word "wagon" in there at all? No? Ok, how about the word "wagen"? Yeah? Ok, time to move on.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
So, again, you were going to buy a base E 300 with shitty wheels and barely any options so you could "impress chicks." And chrome door inserts? haha Also, for the record, I had an E 550 in 2011. That's the one with a real engine. There's a huge difference between an E 300 and an E 550.
.

"A real engine"? Yeah, I went with the "real engine" upgrade with the X5 . . . the 50i . . . the V8/4.4. What have I gotten out of that? Well, a couple of times after getting out of it in a parking lot, some rednecks have asked me if it is as good at towing as they heard. Yeah, about that. It also sounds like a fvcking tank when I gun it, but I'm not a redneck or ghetto, so I don't care about that.

Again, your "vinyl and no options" really meant leather, a panoramic moon roof, and almost a dozen other options? Got it.

It's like the difference between your "mom's" Altima and your Maserati.

You keep looking dumber and dumber. So you think it was my Altima? Again, I am quite sure she had a Maxima. In 2015, I hadn't lived in NY in 13-17 years. So your claim is that I had a Maxima with plates on it from a state that I hadn't lived in for more than a dozen years? More brilliance from you! And if that were the case, considering I am sure my cars were mentioned on here back then, why would I have INSISTED on driving an additional 40 minutes out of my way to pick you guys up/take you back if it would expose some sort of lie of mine?

But lets prove you wrong some more. Before, you said that it was in 2015. In looking at the Disney Marathons, they are in January, so it would have been January of 2016, right? Confirm that so I can prove you wrong once again with what I'll show next. Hell, just confirm that it was in January, and I'll prove you wrong some more.

And yes, even if you don't coach at a college program, you still have a job. You work for someone.

Why is it so hard for you to believe that I never have to work again if I so choose and can live a comfortable life where I will have multiple beach properties, luxury cars, travel like I do, and buy top-of-the-line luxuries? This isn't new. I said that many years ago (but at that time, I could have done it but only in a modest manner).

Your claim that I "still have a job," "work for someone," etc. further shows just how clueless you are.

How about this - and I give permission to Chris McLaughlin to reveal it - ask him where the IP address is for my posts. Ask him to come to this thread and post the results. He will say that over 99% of them are from the same location regardless if it is 10 am (I'm usually still waking up before then), 3 pm, or 11 pm. Now, over the last few months, I have been to Florida twice, LA once, NY once, Mexico once, and Louisiana once, so for a few days of each of those periods, the IP address will be different. But ask him to confirm if 99% of my posts are from this same exact IP address regardless of the time of day. That would pretty much destroy your argument that I have to have a job and have to work for somebody, right? I guess I could possibly work from home doing something, so in that case . . .

How about a deal? You and BC can take turns Facetiming me all day tomorrow. Hell, do it Friday. Do it Saturday. See if I am working somewhere. You guys can do it every hour if you want.

You do realize, that after leaving Cookman (December 2014), I didn't coach for a year, right? Do you think I worked for that 1+ year? How much, since December 2014, do you think I have made outside of royalties from music? So almost four years, how much do you think I have made outside of music?

How can I do it and still maintain this life? For the reason I have said for years. I can choose not to work and maintain this life for the rest of my life. I don't have to take coaching jobs just for a paycheck. I can take coaching jobs for free/very little money and tell the head coach to give my salary for off-field assistants or to help the younger coaches who aren't making much.

And for fvck's sake, you're still holding on to the G Wagon disaster argument. This is embarrassing for you. Gelandewagen. Read that word. How is this difficult for you? Do you see the word "wagon" in there at all? No? Ok, how about the word "wagen"? Yeah? Ok, time to move on.

Don't change the argument. I understand why you spelled it that way. As I said, based on your other grammar gaffes, it wasn't a stretch to think you accidentally butchered the spelling.

Now, stop continuing to hide: show that official Mercedes website that you claimed spelled it "G wagen." Explain how Business Insider and Gear Patrol aren't reputable or legitimate but Wikipedia and The Verge are. Stop being a coward and running from your claims.
 
Yeah, that's probably a result of living in Cairo.
63% of abortions happen after seven weeks according to this:
http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

Per your organ limitation . . . any particular organs that make it your cut-off point? A soon-to-be-realistic hypothetical: when (allowed) science is able to create individual organs from stem cell, are you against them cultivating a lung/heart/kidney for transplant recipients? Now, they wouldn't cultivate a full fetus, remove something, and then off the fetus . . . stem cell would allow them to only grow or cultivate individual organs.

Are you good with that?
developed brain/heart, perhaps. I don't know. How about whatever point a baby can survive outside the womb? What's that? 22 weeks is the youngest, I think. that still seems a bit too long.

If stem cell can save a life without taking a life, I'm fine with it. if a fetus is going to be aborted, why not use it to save another life if possible?
 
"A real engine"? Yeah, I went with the "real engine" upgrade with the X5 . . . the 50i . . . the V8/4.4. What have I gotten out of that? Well, a couple of times after getting out of it in a parking lot, some rednecks have asked me if it is as good at towing as they heard. Yeah, about that. It also sounds like a fvcking tank when I gun it, but I'm not a redneck or ghetto, so I don't care about that.

Again, your "vinyl and no options" really meant leather, a panoramic moon roof, and almost a dozen other options? Got it.



You keep looking dumber and dumber. So you think it was my Altima? Again, I am quite sure she had a Maxima. In 2015, I hadn't lived in NY in 13-17 years. So your claim is that I had a Maxima with plates on it from a state that I hadn't lived in for more than a dozen years? More brilliance from you! And if that were the case, considering I am sure my cars were mentioned on here back then, why would I have INSISTED on driving an additional 40 minutes out of my way to pick you guys up/take you back if it would expose some sort of lie of mine?

But lets prove you wrong some more. Before, you said that it was in 2015. In looking at the Disney Marathons, they are in January, so it would have been January of 2016, right? Confirm that so I can prove you wrong once again with what I'll show next. Hell, just confirm that it was in January, and I'll prove you wrong some more.



Why is it so hard for you to believe that I never have to work again if I so choose and can live a comfortable life where I will have multiple beach properties, luxury cars, travel like I do, and buy top-of-the-line luxuries? This isn't new. I said that many years ago (but at that time, I could have done it but only in a modest manner).

Your claim that I "still have a job," "work for someone," etc. further shows just how clueless you are.

How about this - and I give permission to Chris McLaughlin to reveal it - ask him where the IP address is for my posts. Ask him to come to this thread and post the results. He will say that over 99% of them are from the same location regardless if it is 10 am (I'm usually still waking up before then), 3 pm, or 11 pm. Now, over the last few months, I have been to Florida twice, LA once, NY once, Mexico once, and Louisiana once, so for a few days of each of those periods, the IP address will be different. But ask him to confirm if 99% of my posts are from this same exact IP address regardless of the time of day. That would pretty much destroy your argument that I have to have a job and have to work for somebody, right? I guess I could possibly work from home doing something, so in that case . . .

How about a deal? You and BC can take turns Facetiming me all day tomorrow. Hell, do it Friday. Do it Saturday. See if I am working somewhere. You guys can do it every hour if you want.

You do realize, that after leaving Cookman (December 2014), I didn't coach for a year, right? Do you think I worked for that 1+ year? How much, since December 2014, do you think I have made outside of royalties from music? So almost four years, how much do you think I have made outside of music?

How can I do it and still maintain this life? For the reason I have said for years. I can choose not to work and maintain this life for the rest of my life. I don't have to take coaching jobs just for a paycheck. I can take coaching jobs for free/very little money and tell the head coach to give my salary for off-field assistants or to help the younger coaches who aren't making much.



Don't change the argument. I understand why you spelled it that way. As I said, based on your other grammar gaffes, it wasn't a stretch to think you accidentally butchered the spelling.

Now, stop continuing to hide: show that official Mercedes website that you claimed spelled it "G wagen." Explain how Business Insider and Gear Patrol aren't reputable or legitimate but Wikipedia and The Verge are. Stop being a coward and running from your claims.

Oh man, it's getting so much deeper now. So you're saying you work for free, and even claim to ask the coach to give your salary to someone who needs it more but at your last job you sued the head coach for not paying you? For such an altruist (self-proclaimed), your lifestyle doesn't match your claims. You spend nearly $60k on a stripped-down Mercedes with less options than a loaded Kia or Hyundai just so you can say you drive a Mercedes, but at the same time you attempt to mock others for their selfishness. You wear "$3000 shirts" and "$7000 worth of diamonds" at any given time, carry designer bags and other cringeworthy items . . . think of how much better that money could be used to help ailing children or immigrant families struggling to get by.

And of course you understand why I spelled it that way, it's the correct way. Only a retard would argue otherwise. You're just desperately trying to win an argument you lost weeks ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Oh man, it's getting so much deeper now. So you're saying you work for free, and even claim to ask the coach to give your salary to someone who needs it more

At my last job, yes, I worked for free for a year. It was contingent (my declining a salary) on a certain salary for this year being given based on what the AD allegedly told the head coach would be approved. And after that promise (as well as others) were not kept, I left . . . as did two coordinators for inferior positions and pay elsewhere. So I worked for a year with no pay. At the job prior to that, I gave the majority of my salary back to two others (one who was both the DFO and equipment manager who wasn't earning a penny and one who was a young coach who just had his second child). For that year, I believe my 1080 from them was around $12,000. The year before that, I didn't coach.

So my earnings from coaching in 2015, 2016, 2017, and now 2018 were about $12,000. And no, I have not had any other job since 2012 outside of coaching. In other words, my coaching salary has been about $3000/year for the last four years . . . with no other job . . . starting to understand my claim about not having to work ever again if I don't want and being able to not take any coaching job just for a paycheck if I don't like it?

but at your last job you sued the head coach for not paying you?
.

Wrong again. I sued the school. The head coach, although the one mostly at fault, was not sued. There is no contradiction between that and me being thoughtful with my salary for others. You see, I have been consistent in my principle. If there is an agreement, I expect people to uphold their end. At my last job, I was promised housing, $65,000, and a coordinator position. The housing disappeared. Then, the $65K went to $55K, then to $45K . . . in the meantime, there was enough of a budget for them to hire an off-field personnel guy, so I left. Was it because I really needed that extra $20K they promised me? No. It's out of principle, something you sorely lack.

You wear "$3000 shirts" and "$7000 worth of diamonds" at any given time, carry designer bags . . . think of how much better that money could be used to help ailing children or immigrant families struggling to get by.
'

Oh, you've revised your lie. Weeks ago, it was a "$3000 t-shirt." Now, it's just a $3000 shirt.

I'm very comfortable in the amount of time and money I give to those in need. Being generous and charitable doesn't exclude me from buying expensive things that I like. Likewise, I'm not dropping off bags of thrift-store clothes to them. My last fun was buying Jordan brand backpacks (thanks, Marshall's) for each of the boys, putting new sneakers inside which had socks and knickknacks in each sneaker, some popular brand shirts/shorts rolled up in the bag, and a bunch of school supplies. The director told me they had five boys there and provided the sizes, but by the time I got around to getting that stuff, one of them had already been placed in a foster home, so there is an empty bag sitting around somewhere.

Oh, and not everything was from Marshall's. There are four orphans who have had a rough life who are wearing Prada and Gucci t-shirts to school. Now, is it important for kids to prioritize materialism? Nope. But when kids like that - poor, no parents - are in school, you damn well know they get picked on by others. Giving them some really nice things to have confidence going to school in and helping them feel good about themselves is important. Sometimes, things as meaningless as nice clothes does that for kids at that age.

. . . and at night, the TV they watch was due to me, the mattresses they sleep on was due to me, the paint on their walls was due to me, the drywall giving them some privacy was due to me.

Tell me, how many times has a store manager gotten wind of what your charitable endeavors and offered to reduce the price on the items you were buying to donate to those in need? It's happened twice to me since 2015. I think we both know the answer for somebody as morally bankrupt as you.

carry designer bags and other cringeworthy items . . .

.

Cringeworthy? What does your taste in clothes have to do with this? Luggage sets from these collections are hardly cringeworthy. They are done tastefully without saying "Hey, look at what I have." You should try it.

QpJXeHE.jpg


RbuI6mg.jpg

And of course you understand why I spelled it that way, it's the correct way. Only a retard would argue otherwise. You're just desperately trying to win an argument you lost weeks ago.

I thought you said you weren't hiding? Why do you continue to hide from your claim that the official Mercedes website calls it "G wagen"? You told me to check for myself. Well, I did. Back up your mouth, moron?

Why are you hiding from the month you were in Orlando? Don't want me to disprove another one of your allegations?

Why are you hiding from acknowledging that Business Insider and Gear Patrol are far more reputable than Wikipedia and The Verge?

Tell me where my job is (or has been for the last four years outside of the $12,000 in football), how I just have to have a boss.

You keep making these arguments, then when they are destroyed, you run away from them and make a different failed attempt.


You spend nearly $60k on a stripped-down Mercedes with less options than a loaded Kia or Hyundai just so you can say you drive a Mercedes,
.

It was $57K and some change with a ton of options. And it isn't so I can say I drive a Mercedes. I've owned one in the past. I like how that particular one looks. Somebody who was buying a third car doesn't need it to say "I drive a Mercedes."

The best part is that you have once again exhibited your moral bankruptcy. Over the last month, you have talked shit about my mother's old car, have talked shit about my clothes, have talked shit about my luggage, have talked shit about other materialistic things all because I have mocked you for a lack of intelligence and for saying incredibly stupid and selfish things.

You see, I mock you for your character, heart, and traits. You mock me for materialistic things. That pretty much proves my mocking of you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT