www.cbsnews.com
He may have thought they were saying a 160 year old lady could still get an abortion and that's what he took issue with?I wonder how late into the pregnancy he believes a woman should be allowed to dispose of her unwanted unborn baby.
Trump says Arizona's 160-year-old abortion law goes too far
Former President Donald Trump continued to praise the Supreme Court's June 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
Depends on the poll numbers that weekI wonder how late into the pregnancy he believes a woman should be allowed to dispose of her unwanted unborn baby.
Trump says Arizona's 160-year-old abortion law goes too far
Former President Donald Trump continued to praise the Supreme Court's June 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
Jailing people for medical care is important
Focus on issues that are actually important.
Doesn't giving birth also result in the woman no longer being pregnant?
Sure but if you have a woman with a 16 week old fetus in her give birth then I think you’ll find we have the same result for the fetus.
I guess if you're an irresponsible whore who frequently gets pregnant it would be considered "routine," but no, you moron, abortions aren't part of routine care.
Right, so once again banning abortion is about punishing women for having sex, nothing to do with a baby.
Did your wife give birth to a fetus? Did she she have a fetus shower?
Referring to women as whores only exacerbates the problem as it leads women to seek out an abortion so others do not judge them. If a woman has five abortions and no one knows, she is viewed as being responsible, yet the woman who carries her babies to term is a whore....
Your bleeding heart shows compassion for a "baby" by deciding to kill it? Makes sense, I guess, if you're a liberal nutjob. Oh, just one thing...you forgot to call it, "a clump of cells."
If a tree falls in the forest with no one around, does anyone hear it?
1. If no one knows, they will believe she is not being irresponsible.
We had a non-gendered fetus pre-celebration of course.
Why are you ok killing some babies but not others?
Again, a common example our side has provided (and you're too dishonest to admit) would be if carrying the fetus will place the mother at a high enough medical risk, then abortion may be the humane response.
Why are libs upset if someone has to drive to another state to get an abortion. People go to other states to get “medical care” all the time
I don’t really care about babies. At least relative to the wishes of the woman to not be pregnant. If you could magically shloop the embryo/fetus out and put it in someone who wanted one then I would be all for it. We can’t do that. So if a woman doesn’t want to be pregnant, I’m fine with her choosing not to be pregnant.
If a woman doesn't want to be pregnant there are plenty of ways to prevent that from happening.
Agree. I’m pro making these items easier to obtain. BC pills are much cheaper per month than SNAP and WIC cards
A lot of people advising Trump do not agree with this FWIW.
Sure. Sex ed helps with that. But once they’re pregnant that horse is out of the barn.
And yet there are many Republican politicians that are voting to do just that.
Once they are pregnant then they both need to take care of their responsibilities or give the baby up for adoption.
Why must one adopt? If you oppose the death penalty, do you house convicted murders in your house?
I don't equate babies with convicted murderers. Maybe that's a small part of your problem. Moron.
