I got this from some internet sources I have. Not my words below. This is out there for public consumption.
The gentleman who shared and wrote this works for an organization that does R&D for the US military
The photo was taken from a security camera on an adjecent building. The missile was traveling at Mach 5.
-----------
I was able to isolate the missile from video footage provided by the Ukrainians of the recent mall attack. I think the proportionality, winglets, and rear vertical stabilizer clearly identify it as a Kh-22 NATO reporting name “Kitchen”. Originally designed by the Russians to sink American carriers during the Cold War, it is nuclear-capable.
The Kh-22 has an inertial guidance system followed by active radar homing for terminal guidance. Likely deployed from a Tu-22M Blinder.
The Kh-22 is an odd weapon to use for the mall attack for a variety of reasons and suggests the Russians may be running out of more traditional precision guided weaponry.
It is unspeakable to use such a weapon against a civilian target with clearly no military value. There could be no better evidence that this incident represents the worst sort of war crime. Who would order such a thing?
---------------------------
The gentleman who shared and wrote this works for an organization that does R&D for the US military
The photo was taken from a security camera on an adjecent building. The missile was traveling at Mach 5.
-----------
I was able to isolate the missile from video footage provided by the Ukrainians of the recent mall attack. I think the proportionality, winglets, and rear vertical stabilizer clearly identify it as a Kh-22 NATO reporting name “Kitchen”. Originally designed by the Russians to sink American carriers during the Cold War, it is nuclear-capable.
The Kh-22 has an inertial guidance system followed by active radar homing for terminal guidance. Likely deployed from a Tu-22M Blinder.
The Kh-22 is an odd weapon to use for the mall attack for a variety of reasons and suggests the Russians may be running out of more traditional precision guided weaponry.
It is unspeakable to use such a weapon against a civilian target with clearly no military value. There could be no better evidence that this incident represents the worst sort of war crime. Who would order such a thing?
---------------------------