As you know, they always did have some great food options on the grounds outside the actual structure. There were numerous tents and food trucks operating there.I believe the listed capacity of the new stadium is around 21,000-22,000, which is really not much more than the old place, Foreman Field. Of course, from the video it look much nicer and supposedly contains more and better concessions, more, and more modern, restrooms (is anyone at MU listening).
Just wonder if the S.B. Ballard Construction folks are doing the work. Guess they contributed some significant $$$$ to the project. Ballard's construction is also doing the ultra plush new basketball arena at James Madison which will open for the 20-21 season.
The endzone is what Marshall needs in the South endzone at Edwards Stadium.
The endzone is what Marshall needs in the South endzone at Edwards Stadium.
Why? The Joan has some nice Suites on the Home side.
HerdZilla22 in Charlotte
But, I like my unobstructed-front- row -seat -with -plenty -of -leg -room-end-zone-seat.A few reasons:
1. The endzone seats are not needed. Only a few times since they were built were they actually needed. Removing them would put people along the sidelines and make the stadium look better both at the game and more importantly, on TV.
2. The endzone seats look cheap and you can tell they were an afterthought in the design of the stadium. Simply put, they look bad.
3. Last time I heard, the one place where we actually had a demand for more seats it was with the sky boxes. This would give us an opportunity to have more space available.
4. A "party deck" or a standing room only type area could be added as well which would look great.
That's all for now.
I like the idea of turning the endzone into a party deck for two reasons:
1) Milennials dig that shhh and it might actually bring more students out to the game
2) As my wife (Huntington native) has told me, the grassy knoll was pretty much a unofficial party deck in the old days anyway
A few reasons:
1. The endzone seats are not needed. Only a few times since they were built were they actually needed. Removing them would put people along the sidelines and make the stadium look better both at the game and more importantly, on TV.
2. The endzone seats look cheap and you can tell they were an afterthought in the design of the stadium. Simply put, they look bad.
3. Last time I heard, the one place where we actually had a demand for more seats it was with the sky boxes. This would give us an opportunity to have more space available.
4. A "party deck" or a standing room only type area could be added as well which would look great.
That's all for now.
A few times...I'm guessing you're referring to home games against big opponents?
Those are increasing.
I like the idea of turning the endzone into a party deck for two reasons:
1) Milennials dig that shhh and it might actually bring more students out to the game
2) As my wife (Huntington native) has told me, the grassy knoll was pretty much a unofficial party deck in the old days anyway
For all below data, P5 teams are indicated by bold, FCS/I-AA opponents indicated by italics.
In the last ten years, Marshall has hosted nine games in excess of 30,000 attendees (the maximum capacity of the stadium prior to the endzone expansion).
2010 WVU - 41,382
2011 Virginia Tech - 34,424
2012 Ohio - 33,436
2014 Ohio - 31,710
2014 MTSU - 30,210
2014 Rice - 30,680
2015 Purdue - 38,791
2016 Louisville - 40,592
2017 NC State - 32,349
Following is the upcoming slate of opponents (with last home crowd vs. indicated where applicable):
Appalachian State (No attendance data available, last meeting in 1995, prior to expansion)
Army
Boise State
Cincinnati (29,237)
East Carolina (25,117)
Liberty
Navy
Ohio (31,710)
Pitt
Virginia Tech (34,424)
VMI
Western Michigan (19,803)
People that want to drink and casually pay attention to the game are probably going to be happier in the lot tailgating
Wrong
wow. I had no idea that there were that many outside. I have never been outside the stadium during a game so I never saw that.Well we usually have around 2-3 K scattered in the lots during the games, as opposed to being in the stadium. He does have somewhat of a point.
Well we usually have around 2-3 K scattered in the lots during the games, as opposed to being in the stadium. He does have somewhat of a point.
Well we usually have around 2-3 K scattered in the lots during the games, as opposed to being in the stadium. He does have somewhat of a point.
Not really. Fans currently have no other option to congregate, watch the game, and have some adult beverages. IMO If some fans were actually given the opportunity to socialize (with adult beverages) in a less restrictive manner (seats) and watch the game, you would indeed attract more individuals to come and/or stay around vs. standing in a parking lot.
That happens everywhere, the folks milling around Ohio Stadium during a game is astounding. More people than MU has ever had inside the stadium.
My wife and I know several “fans” who tailgate every game but have never attended a game, including a very prominent Htgn businessman who hasn’t walked inside JCE since DH was hired.
I often see him court side at basketball games. I didn't notice much change in him. He is still very over weight but the same could be said for me....I wouldn't call them fans. Last time I saw MR, he walked into Baskin Robbins looking like a street person. He didn't look good at all.
I wouldn't call them fans. Last time I saw MR, he walked into Baskin Robbins looking like a street person. He didn't look good at all.
Okay then, reason #2: not having an extra 13,000 empty seats at every home game, thinning our crowd out to the point it looks like hardly anybody's there to anyone in the stadium or watching at home.
I'm pretty sure the state laughed when that was suggested like 10 years ago, and they haven't brought it back up since.So...does this mean we're not going to build the upper deck on the visitor side? Cause I thought we were totally doing that as soon as Hamrick raised the funds?
I'm pretty sure the state laughed when that was suggested like 10 years ago, and they haven't brought it back up since.
I believe the listed capacity of the new stadium is around 21,000-22,000, which is really not much more than the old place, Foreman Field. Of course, from the video it look much nicer and supposedly contains more and better concessions, more, and more modern, restrooms (is anyone at MU listening).
Just wonder if the S.B. Ballard Construction folks are doing the work. Guess they contributed some significant $$$$ to the project. Ballard's construction is also doing the ultra plush new basketball arena at James Madison which will open for the 20-21 season.
You may be a tad high on those %.The state is 5% interested in supporting MU as an academic institution and 0% interested in supporting MU athletics.
Okay then, reason #2: not having an extra 13,000 empty seats at every home game, thinning our crowd out to the point it looks like hardly anybody's there to anyone in the stadium or watching at home.
I often see him court side at basketball games. I didn't notice much change in him. He is still very over weight but the same could be said for me....
So...does this mean we're not going to build the upper deck on the visitor side? Cause I thought we were totally doing that as soon as Hamrick raised the funds?
As a side note to this - USA Today has a good article on the attendance crisis in Major League Baseball and the new trend of smaller ballparks with more fan friendly amenities. It's all about entertainment and a fan experience - especially with the under 30 crowd and their A.D.D.
Marshall brass would be well advised to hone in on this and make every effort to keep whats going on in and around the stadium as lively and fun as possible. Either that or continue to wonder why the fan base is shrinking. Winning helps, but that's not the only piece of the puzzle.