Would You?

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

For the perks of it, would you bang (assuming your pecker could get hard for the task) the owner/president of the L.A. Lakers? She is in her 50s, which is way beyond the age I'll ever sleep with, even when I am in my 70s. But she did pose for Playboy 20+ years ago, which looked pretty good (other than the 80s bush she was sporting).

So bang somebody 15 years older for a month or two for the privileges it provides?

 

[Bankerreturns]

No, because I am happy with the life I have.

 

[herdfan429]

I’m not a superficial asshole with a false sense of self importance so age doesn’t matter

 

[sistersville]

No words

 

[i am herdman]

There is a statistical chance that Magic Johnson asked himself the same thing and while the odds may be remote, there is still a chance(even if it is .00001%) that he may have been able to act that out. You never know.

So, my answer is no. I would not with her.

Plus, at some point you grow up and don't worry about things like that.

 

[sistersville]

Evidently not herdman. Lol

 

[mlblack16.]

She is in her 50s, which is way beyond the age I'll ever sleep with

Wait, I thought you implied that Kathy Griffin (who is 58) was hot and that you would bang her?

That having said, if I weren't married and the opportunity was there, hell yeah I'd hit it to get paid. But after her looks completely faded I would have to abandon ship.

 

[GK4Herd]

For the perks of it, would you bang (assuming your pecker could get hard for the task) the owner/president of the L.A. Lakers? She is in her 50s, which is way beyond the age I'll ever sleep with, even when I am in my 70s. But she did pose for Playboy 20+ years ago, which looked pretty good (other than the 80s bush she was sporting).

So bang somebody 15 years older for a month or two for the privileges it provides?

Are you saying you have no plans to be settled down with someone in your 70s? To each his own I guess, but that sounds so lonely to me.

 

[herdfan06]

I think I would sit this one out, but Kathy Griffin, put me in coach, I am ready to play center field.

 

[herdfan06]

I’m not a superficial asshole with a false sense of self importance so age doesn’t matter

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

There sure is a lot of misplaced bitterness in this thread. Don't be mad at me that you're stuck only getting to bang a 50+ year old for the rest of your life. Only you are to blame for your life decisions.

No, because I am happy with the life I have.

Being happy with something doesn't mean you can't improve it. Hamrick is happy with a football team that goes 8-4 in Conference USA. Does that mean he shouldn't work to improve it?

I’m not a superficial asshole with a false sense of self importance so age doesn’t matter

It would be hard to have any sense of self-importance, false or not, when you spend half of your life giving bodyrubs to pre-pubescent children.

Plus, at some point you grow up and don't worry about things like that.

At some point, you don't care about what the person you are banging looks like? God, I hope I never reach that age.

Wait, I thought you implied that Kathy Griffin (who is 58) was hot and that you would bang her?

You're used to being wrong. I never implied anything of the sort. I said that she had a great body for a woman her age, which she does. There are some 80 year olds who have a great body for their age. Doesn't mean I'd bang either of them.

Are you saying you have no plans to be settled down with someone in your 70s?
.

No, it means that my future wife is still a few years away from being born.

 

[GK4Herd]

There sure is a lot of misplaced bitterness in this thread. Don't be mad at me that you're stuck only getting to bang a 50+ year old for the rest of your life. Only you are to blame for your life decisions.

I’d still rather be me.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

It's all pink inside.

 

[WV-FAN]

It's all pink inside.

blue waffle

 

[MStap]

Most of the responses are what you would, and should, expect from married guys. Assuming my girlfriend wasn’t in the picture, the answer is a hard yes.

While I don’t know anything about her personally, I wouldn’t use her age as a yes/no decision maker. Anyone that gets to that level of success, particularly a female, is going to be able to support an unfathomable lifestyle and it is going to be a fun ride. I’ve always found drive and work ethic to be very attractive qualities. If she is just a bimbo then she must be really good at certain things.

Go have some fun and enjoy the sky box.

 

[ggmike1992]

TTIWWP

 

[countryroads89]

This woman hasn’t hit 50 yet but she is only 1 year away. No one in their right mind would turn her down.

 

[Bankerreturns]

Rifle, you don't make your life better by chasing the material things some sugar momma could give you.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Rifle, you don't make your life better by chasing the material things some sugar momma could give you.

Really? Material things don't make your life better/more enjoyable? So you bought that M3 due to its fuel efficiency and spacious interior for your family, right?

 

[Bankerreturns]

It was an M5 and I didn't need some rich old lady to get it for me.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

It was an M5 .

So you bought it because it made life better/more comfortable. In other words, you contradicted your own statement to me.

and I didn't need some rich old lady to get it for me.

Listen, regardless of what Murox the Moron tries telling you, all of my stories are true. Do you really think I need anyone to buy me anything? What exactly do you think she is going to buy me: A Gulfstream G550? A $20 million beach mansion? Why would you think I would be interested in what she can buy me?

Today, I went to Gucci, Armani, and Neiman Marcus. Here were my purchases:

That's a $1900 sweater, a $375 polo, a $975 blazer/jacket, a $1000 pair of pants, and a $1475 briefcase . . . all bought today.

And in case you think these may be pictures from the past, here is today's receipt with today's date on it:

Then, I went to Gucci and bought these pants for $885:

And again, if you think it may be an old picture/purchase, here is a picture of the receipt showing my name and today's date. Oh, and you can also see that I have a customer ID because I am on their "First Look" group, which allows the two dozen of us to get access to all of their new arrivals before anyone else is able to see/buy them:

From there, I went to Neiman Marcus. I didn't find anything that I liked, but I did find something to give to the children at the children's house. It's a $400 giraffe chair. The younger kids will love sitting and playing on it. I felt bad that it would only be able to go in either the boys' or girls' bedroom, so I asked if there was any way I could order one. That particular Neiman Marcus doesn't have one, but the manager said that she knew a store in a city about 30 minutes away has a zebra one. She is calling me tomorrow to see if they still have it, so that way I can put one in the boys' bedroom and one in the girls' bedroom.

And here's the receipt showing today's date, my name, and the store showing that it wasn't an old purchase:

Oh, and these were purchased for $14 on 11/30 from Walmart. They are Nerf-like material, but also have a Bluetooth speaker built in. So the older kids have a football to play with and, if they have a smart phone, can play music through the football. They are rechargeable so they don't need to keep getting batteries.

Excluding the Walmart footballs, that totals around $7500 with tax that I paid for clothes, a briefcase, and the giraffe chair. So tell me, what exactly do you think I need a sugar momma' to buy for me that I don't already buy for myself?

As the owner/president of the Lakers, she'd be able to provide far better things than materialistic things.

 

[Bankerreturns]

I feel so sorry for you, I really do. Who in the world are you trying to impress by posting pictures of some clothes?

Here's the difference. I bought an M5 because I really enjoy cars, especially fast ones that handle like a dream when being drove hard. Most people, especially around here, don't know the difference between a M5 or a 528 when they see one. I didn't buy it as a status symbol or to impress anyone. I live in the same house I bought 20 years ago when I only made about a quarter of what I make now. I drove a used Durango for 11 years before I bought the M5 and have driven a Ford Fusion for the six years since I got rid of it. I don't feel the need to impress anyone on this earth.

I have my faith and my family. I don't need to try and buy happiness or respect. Does wearing a $1,900 sweater make you truly a happier person? You're looking for fulfillment in the wrong places.

 

[C.K. Ocsevol-Evad]

I feel so sorry for you, I really do. Who in the world are you trying to impress by posting pictures of some clothes?

.

It’s not about impressing anyone. It’s about proving your comment absurd that I would have to rely on somebody to buy me something considering I spent $7500 on some clothes just today.

Here's the difference. I bought an M5 because I really enjoy cars, especially fast ones that handle like a dream when being drove hard. Most people, especially around here, don't know the difference between a M5 or a 528 when they see one.
.

So I’m other words, you chased something materialistic to provide you happiness.

You do know what the word “hypocrite” means, right? Or is your vocabulary as poor as your math?

I have my faith and my family. I don't need to try and buy happiness or respect.
.

How can you not see how you’re contradicting yourself? You bought a very expensive car to provide you with enjoyment and happiness. Yet you don’t need to try and buy happiness? That’s exactly what you did by buying an expensive car.

. Does wearing a $1,900 sweater make you truly a happier person? .

If I like the way it looks? Yes. If I like the way it feels? Yes. Likewise, if I wear a $10 hat from Marshall’s that I like how it looks, I am a happier person from that, too.

See, you can’t say I’m trying to buy happiness through materialism when you went out and bought an expensive car to make you happy.

 

[herdfan429]

That red sweater looks like hotel furniture upholstery

 

[WV-FAN]

Both y'all mofos some materialistic fvckers. Ive always figured that if you got it, spend it, can't take it with you.

You've both proven that a fool and their money does soon part, doe.

 

[herdfan06]

Yes. Likewise, if I wear a $10 hat from Marshall’s that I like how it looks, I am a happier person from that, too.

*Marshalls

 

[GK4Herd]

Rifle would spend a fortune in Palessi.

 

[19MU88]

I feel so sorry for you, I really do. Who in the world are you trying to impress by posting pictures of some clothes?

Here's the difference. I bought an M5 because I really enjoy cars, especially fast ones that handle like a dream when being drove hard. Most people, especially around here, don't know the difference between a M5 or a 528 when they see one. I didn't buy it as a status symbol or to impress anyone. I live in the same house I bought 20 years ago when I only made about a quarter of what I make now. I drove a used Durango for 11 years before I bought the M5 and have driven a Ford Fusion for the six years since I got rid of it. I don't feel the need to impress anyone on this earth.

I have my faith and my family. I don't need to try and buy happiness or respect. Does wearing a $1,900 sweater make you truly a happier person? You're looking for fulfillment in the wrong places.

My thoughts exactly. Pathetic

 

[Rock98Dog]

No dog in this fight, but I guess you're saying a $1,900 sweater performs better than a $100 sweater to make the analogy work with a M5 versus a regular car?

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

No dog in this fight, but I guess you're saying a $1,900 sweater performs better than a $100 sweater to make the analogy work with a M5 versus a regular car?

I wear clothes for a few reasons:

1) To stay warm with a focus on comfort
2) To cover my enormously large crank
3) For aesthetic reasons

That particular $1900 sweater, just like the pants and blazer, accomplish at least two of those better than a $100 sweater.

The better the quality of clothing, the better it is as keeping you insulated and the more comfortable it is. For high-end clothing, at least with most high-end designers, the material they use is special cloth. Not only with feel, but also visually, you can see a significant difference in the fabric. Armani does that. Gucci does that. Prada is hit-or-miss. I love Prada designs, but they also will use very average fabric in clothes and in some of their bags, stick their label on them, and sell them for a ton. Prada has some very nicely made bags, but they also sell some very average nylon (and not even the thick, canvas-like nylon) bags for way too much . . . and they sell.

 

[MarshallManiac]

Everybody is worried about the cost. I'm just over here as a fat guy wondering why rifle is wearing my size.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

European sizes. Italian designers always have extremely small sizes. I tried on a XXXL Prada shirt yesterday. Prada makes only select garment in XXXL. The sleeve length was fine, but the bottom had trouble reaching my waist line. A U.S. XXXL would have reached my knees.

The size 50 Gucci pants are U.S. 32 waist size. The size 54 Armani pants are U.S. size 34/36. Not all are exact, so a 50 Gucci could be the same size as a 52 Armani.

 

[i am herdman]

Yagi, I hope retro bush comes back. Just so you will have to make a decision.

 

[C.K. Ocsevol-Evad]

Yagi, I hope retro bush comes back. Just so you will have to make a decision.

I know trends repeat, but I really can’t see that coming back mainstream.

Who wants a bunch of hair to look at? Who wants to pick hair out of your teeth and throat? Who wants a place that harbors bacteria, odors, germs, and the wedding ring of the last guy who fingered her?

This isn’t some sort of trend. It’s now a societal norm that is acceptable and viewed as widespread etiquette. I was first laid in 1992. Even then, hair was already being viewed negatively. It’s approaching thirty years. That is long enough to be customary and not a trend.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

$1000 pants and shirts...I just don't get it. Don't give me that quality bullshit...you are paying for the name. There's plenty of quality stuff at 10% of those prices.

I'm pretty happy with these jeans at got at Sam's for $15. My legs were warm today, and my junk fit inside just fine.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

$1000 pants and shirts...I just don't get it. Don't give me that quality bullshit...you are paying for the name. There's plenty of quality stuff at 10% of those prices.

I'm pretty happy with these jeans at got at Sam's for $15. My legs were warm today, and my junk fit inside just fine.

So you have no problem thinking that beer made with cheap ingredients (Natural Ice) tastes like shit compared to beer of higher quality.

You have no problem thinking that a no-named brand of chocolate that sells bars for $.50 tastes like shit compared to a bar that uses better ingredients and sells for 10x as much.

You have no problem thinking that the leather in a Civic is inferior to the quality of leather in a Rolls Royce.

You have no problem thinking that the sound that comes out of Sceptre television speakers is worse than the sound that comes out of Sonos or Bose speakers that are far more expensive.

But god forbid the belief that expensive garments actually use better quality material than your local five & dime.

I like Levi's jeans, because they offer a far more extensive cut than many of the more expensive brands that only offer skinny/tapered jeans, and because Levi's doesn't usually have a bunch of obnoxious and gaudy jeans with holes/yellowish fading on purpose, white stitching, etc.. I have 3-4 Levi's, and I wear those as much or more than anything. However, even the highest quality/most expensive Levi's pale in comparison in comfort and quality to the more expensive brand of jeans that I have like Rag & Bone, Gucci, Hudson, and 7. Even though I prefer the Levi's because of the reasons I listed, it is still easy to tell by touching (and looking up close) that the other brands use better material.

Go compare a $2500 Giorgio Armani leather bag compared to a $250 Armani Exchange leather bag. You will quickly be able to tell, simply by the quality of leather, why the one brand of Armani bag is so much more than the other brand of Armani bag.

Go compare a Briggs & Riley, Tumi, or Gucci suitcase to an American Tourister suitcase. Besides the lifetime warranty on some of the first group, there is a reason why they are far more expensive than American Tourister. The quality of material used is far better.

I don't buy things because they are expensive or because they are a certain brand. I buy things because I like the way they look, feel, or their quality. It just happens to be that many, but not all, of the things I like the look, feel, and quality of tend to be more expensive than average. I like the look and lightness of many Saucony sneakers. I have 3-4 purchased over the last year. They are far from being considered an expensive brand of sneaker.

 

[WV-FAN]

^^^^^truth and bullshit combined

I'll buy that a 4 figure sweater is more comfy than a $20 sweater or $2500 bag is better quality than a bag a tenth of the cost, and that people who have the money to waste make such purchases because of said better quality and comfort.

However, make no mistake, while people may make such asinine money wasteful expenditures for quality and comfort, such purchases are made even more for status, acceptance, braggadocio, etc. Look no farther than this thread.

Mind boggling how libs believe in wealth redistribution as long as it doesn't affect them. One would think they'd rather redistribute their fortune to the needy than waste it on expensive materialistic possessions. Afterall, that's their belief!

Funny how that works, redistribute wealth . . . as long as it's not theirs. And spare me the sob stories of the children you purchase a few toys and clothes for in order to play hide the salami with their mommy.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

So you have no problem thinking that beer made with cheap ingredients (Natural Ice) tastes like shit compared to beer of higher quality.

You have no problem thinking that a no-named brand of chocolate that sells bars for $.50 tastes like shit compared to a bar that uses better ingredients and sells for 10x as much.

You have no problem thinking that the leather in a Civic is inferior to the quality of leather in a Rolls Royce.

You have no problem thinking that the sound that comes out of Sceptre television speakers is worse than the sound that comes out of Sonos or Bose speakers that are far more expensive.

But god forbid the belief that expensive garments actually use better quality material than your local five & dime.

I like Levi's jeans.

It's funny you would start this rant by comparing totally opposite ends of the spectrum. I'm not telling you to go buy the Natty Ice of clothes (even though I sincerely believe these Sam's jeans are better than Levi's, which are now made of a thin and inferior denim compared to their past products). I'm telling you the $12 six pack of beer is plenty good compared to some obscure imported bomber for $30. I'm saying this LL Bean hoodie I wore today still looks and feels good after 10 years, and I doubt one costing $1000 would do any better.

You can get a Civic with leather? I had no idea, I've never seen one. And I've owned two, not even my Si had leather. *

*I went and looked...holy shit, you can indeed now get a Civic with leather. However that model only comes with a CVT transmission, and thus I have never bothered to look at or build one on the website.

A $2500 leather bag? That goes against every fiber of my instincts. I'll stick to my $100ish backpack, it works equally as well for an overnight hike as it does as a carry-on.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

^^^^^truth and bullshit combined

I'll buy that a 4 figure sweater is more comfy than a $20 sweater or $2500 bag is better quality than a bag a tenth of the cost, and that people who have the money to waste make such purchases because of said better quality and comfort.

However, make no mistake, while people may make such asinine money wasteful expenditures for quality and comfort, such purchases are made even more for status, acceptance, braggadocio, etc. Look no farther than this thread..

What I don't buy is a $1000 sweater is practically of better quality than a $100-$200 one. Maybe the $1000 one caresses your nipples or some shit.

 

[extragreen]

Cons talking about redistribution of wealth after their trillion and a half giveaway to the wealthy. Rich.