ADVERTISEMENT

Black Californians warn Gavin "Hair-Gel Nazi" Newsom of 'direct impact' on Commie-la Harris after Democrats kill slave reparation bills

I don't know why black people are surprised. Democrats have been promising them the world for years, TO GET THEIR VOTES, not because they care.

  • Like
Reactions: mlblack16.

Gold Star families slam Commie-la Harris for 'playing politics' over Trump's visit to Arlington National Cemetery

Democrats, their policies and their bleaters are destroying our country

MSNBC host rages after seeing polls showing Trump leading, calls Electoral College a ‘suicide pact’

Yeah, why would we want states like California, New York, Massachusetts, Illinois, Virginia, Colorado, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Minnesota, New Jersey, Connecticut, Vermont, Washington, and Maryland to decide what happens? It's not like they are the most educated states, the states with the highest per capita income, most of the states with the highest GDP, most of the states with the lowest violence per capita, etc. or anything, right? Why would we want to follow states with those things?

Because they are destroying our country, dumbass. Our founding fathers weren't as ignorant as you are.

Their idea of "educated" is brainwashed bleaters who do what they're told. Their education ratings mean nothing.

The rest of us are "uneducated" because we think for ourselves and value our freedoms.
  • Like
Reactions: mlblack16.

Around College Football

That was an enjoyable review. You should do that every week so I don’t have to watch any games. I really tried to sit down and enjoy the contests like I always have the first big Saturday of each college football season, but I just wasn’t into it this year.

Since the NIL program took over, I find that I’m not as interested. I watched about ten minutes of the Morgantown game then I drove out for a new vehicle inspection sticker and to look at nursery trees. Had a milkshake too.

I found a wonderful little plant nursery in Daniels, WV with some varieties of small trees I hadn’t seen before. A nice orange variegated Japanese maple, a hibiscus with white edged leaves, and one other beautiful little tree whose name I have forgotten. My loss of memory might be from turning over the price tag on the specimen and seeing $600.

I didn’t think things like this happened in San Francisco...

I will repeat for the dimwitted among us...
extremeright061.png

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news.

  • Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as numerous false claims.

Same ole Fancher

You've made this comment in two separate threads, and since I didn't remember it, I went back and looked.

Fancher had two incompletions on their last drive. One was their final play when he was pressured, scrambling, and basically tossed it anywhere he could as he was being tackled. The only other incompletion was nothing like you described: a receiver wasn't "wide open," wasn't 20 yards down field, wasn't directly in front of him, and definitely would not have been the game winner even if it had been completed. As the commentators said, it looked like Fancher thought the receiver was going to sit his route down. Regardless, this couldn't have been the incompletion you were talking about, as none of it matched with what you said. On his final drive, on a 4th-and-8, he threw a beautiful ball for over a tightly covered receiver for a 20+ yard completion in the middle of the field.

Here is the full game replay. You can skip ahead to the end of the game and watch FAU's final drive. What incompletion were you talking about?

Game replay: https://www.foxsports.com/replay/fmc-wtxd8e1ewb2b968t
Play-by-play script: https://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay/_/gameId/401628453

If you're talking about the second-to-last drive, then you've neglected to do a few things;
1) You didn't mention how the receiver was basically tackled, and then after the collision with the defender, the receiver didn't get back on track. He, for whatever reason, bent his route. Fancher's ball was thrown exactly where it should have been - up the field which was open. He would have no way of knowing the receiver was going to change his route after the collision.
2) You didn't mention that two plays before, Fancher threw a seed in very tight coverage. As the commentator said, it was such a good throw, that just a split second later would have been an INT.
3) Two plays after your referenced play, Fancher (list most of the game) was hit 1.5 seconds after the snap. Literally, he had a defender touching him 1.5 seconds after the snap. But instead of being sacked like most QBs would have been, he used his legs to get out of it, scrambled, and threw another seed while on the run for 10 yards.
1. It may have been the next to last drive, not the final. Regardless, he completely overthrew the receiver.
2. I’ve never argued he hasn’t had flashes. He has. I’ve said he’s inconsistent. He is.
3. I don’t care enough to rewatch.

If you are arguing his passing hasn’t been inconsistent, regardless of protection, you’re being willfully ignorant. If you aren’t, then there’s not much debate here.

Same ole Fancher

On the final drive, he completely overthrew a wide open receive 20 yards directly in front of him that would have likely been the game winner. And he was not being pressured.

You've made this comment in two separate threads, and since I didn't remember it, I went back and looked.

Fancher had two incompletions on their last drive. One was their final play when he was pressured, scrambling, and basically tossed it anywhere he could as he was being tackled. The only other incompletion was nothing like you described: a receiver wasn't "wide open," wasn't 20 yards down field, wasn't directly in front of him, and definitely would not have been the game winner even if it had been completed. As the commentators said, it looked like Fancher thought the receiver was going to sit his route down. Regardless, this couldn't have been the incompletion you were talking about, as none of it matched with what you said. On his final drive, on a 4th-and-8, he threw a beautiful ball for over a tightly covered receiver for a 20+ yard completion in the middle of the field.

Here is the full game replay. You can skip ahead to the end of the game and watch FAU's final drive. What incompletion were you talking about?

Game replay: https://www.foxsports.com/replay/fmc-wtxd8e1ewb2b968t
Play-by-play script: https://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay/_/gameId/401628453

If you're talking about the second-to-last drive, then you've neglected to do a few things;
1) You didn't mention how the receiver was basically tackled, and then after the collision with the defender, the receiver didn't get back on track. He, for whatever reason, bent his route. Fancher's ball was thrown exactly where it should have been - up the field which was open. He would have no way of knowing the receiver was going to change his route after the collision.
2) You didn't mention that two plays before, Fancher threw a seed in very tight coverage. As the commentator said, it was such a good throw, that just a split second later would have been an INT.
3) Two plays after your referenced play, Fancher (list most of the game) was hit 1.5 seconds after the snap. Literally, he had a defender touching him 1.5 seconds after the snap. But instead of being sacked like most QBs would have been, he used his legs to get out of it, scrambled, and threw another seed while on the run for 10 yards.
  • Angry
Reactions: Rye_uns_bald_spot
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT