A reasonable person would be aware that I post as many positive things about Marshall as I do negative things.
It's disproportionate. I don't think I am the only one surprised to see you post something positive about Marshall.
As I have shown, I make as many positive posts about Marshall as negative posts.
Here is another one from a couple of weeks ago where I defended Marshall and its fanbase:
Login to view embedded media
You aren't defending Huff because you are supporting Marshall. You are defending Huff because you have an infatuation with him being a minority and using it as unfounded leverage to trash Marshall fans and the State.
I have "an infatuation with Huff being a minority"? Let me know when that infatuation starts with Corny. More reasonable (which you are continuing to show to not be), I point out the backwardness of the state of west virginia which frequently includes discrimination against minorities of all kinds.
Side note: As soon as I made my post, I said to myself, "He won't be able to help himself and will dig through the archives to prove he said something positive."
Uhh, yeah. That is how disagreements work. Reasonable people find proof to defend their argument while others just lob absurd accusations, try physically fighting fellow Marshall fans at multiple games, screw over friends/colleagues in business and escape to another state, scam friends/colleagues out of donation status, etc.
So me posting examples, including of just a couple of weeks ago, defending Marshall is as reasonable as a thing to do in this type of disagreement.