4 of 6 for 68. His 3 drives - punt-punt-downs. No points.
He had two drives. Why lie when you know it’s easy to see the truth? He was hurt on the third drive on first down after having just completed a 34 yard pass. He got three snaps on that drive. The backup got four snaps.
After Fancher moved the ball into ECU territory, the backup produced -8 yards on four snaps and a turnover on down. So yeah, tell me who was better.
His backup led a TD drive on the next possession.
How about transparency, dishonest one? On that TD drive, FAU moved the ball to the ECU 35 all on runs, none of them from the QB. Must have been a hard gig.
After that drive, the backup followed with a 3-and-out, another 3-and-out, a drive (one play) stopped due to halftime, an interception, and then another interception.
I guess you just forgot about the rest, huh?
For some reason, you hate acknowledging that Fancher would have been valuable to have on this year’s team. For some reason, you hate acknowledging that Fancher was good enough to be a starter on both FBS teams he was on for at least three years.
Your dishonest post is almost as bad as when you lied by purposely inferring that he was pulled for throwing an INT, when you knew that wasn’t the case.
