ADVERTISEMENT

30,000 people die in Britain on NHS waiting list last year

Troll alert


MURDER WAS THE CASE THAT THEY GAVE ME

714lA7nTPWL._SX425_.jpg
 
If a company wants to purchase health insurance, it’s nearly impossible.

Would you want to offer health insurance to an area where everyone is fat, smokes, eats lard, drinks 30 packs of beer, does hard drugs, is exposed to massive amounts of environmental pollutants, and where 90% of people with a higher than average IQ have fled? Single payer is probably the only hope for WV within a few years.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HerdBuckeye
They can already walk into any ER and get "free" healthcare, moron (in honor of EG's return).

Since you highlighted "free", I am going to assume you mean people on welfare who drink, smoke, and eat junk (fvck it, the rich can do as they wish). Let's be honest: they are more likely to do these things already, so why incentivize they quit? Hell, let's get them to croak ASAP, save some money. If we are lucky they will all have cancer and die by 40. We can put extra formaldehyde in the cheap cigarettes.

Maybe you can get the Bible Thumping wing of your party to convince people to give up drinking and smoking.

Seriously, who gives a fvck? There will always be some free-riders, drunks, people who eat three Whoppers a day. It's been that way since Biblical times. Outliers is no way to design policy.



Triggered!! Not a surprise. This is the usual response from you... "Bible Thumpers! Rich! Bible Thumpers! Rich!!" How about in honor of EG's return, you go pop a Xanax, a Crestor, slam another drive thru value meal, calm the fvck down and actually try and have a conversation.

Seriously? Outliers? You just showed us a study that basically tries to say that an entire demographic (without health insurance, supposedly 10s of millions within our population), can expect to die younger. I've also been told endlessly by social justice warriors like yourself that this demographic isn't an outlier. That the upper "1%" get everything...and the "99%" get the scraps....thus your constant whining about the "rich".

Of course it isn't "free" (despite it being the key selling point to the 99% for it's implementation). However you might want to explain that to rifle, (the reason "free" was originally highlighted) and the rest of the "majority" that constantly demand single payer systems. No one here that points to the negative results of single payer have ever suggested that there is literally zero cost. Its exactly the opposite.

I'll ask again (nothing to do with bible thumpers). 1)Does anyone really believe ("free") health insurance is going to incentivize individual healthier living? More importantly, 2) shouldn't that actually be the purpose and "design" of any policy that's supposedly about "saving lives" and "lowering costs"?

Of course the obvious answer to my first question is "No'. If people who actually contribute to their health care plans (pay $$$) and health insurance, don't even have the discipline to keep their 40 year old obese ass out of the local chili dog stand and off the cath lab tables, then avg Joe Billy Bob without insurance, needing a govt subsidy, and utilizing "single payer" wont either. That's why everyone put on/in such a system runs the bigger odds of getting put on the "wait list", as you say.... to croak.

The answer to my 2nd question: It should be "THE PURPOSE". Unfortunately govt policy "purpose" is about covering it's previously failed policy and ultimately trying to reduce it's own (benefit obligation) cost via restrictions on patient (taxpayer) choices on specific types of care (ala Obummercare via CMS).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
That's right! In fact, we should just expedite the process. Those who aren't a certain height, a certain BMI, and have a minimum IQ should be dealt with. I don't care if they are sent to their own island or extinguished another way, but why are we allowing the weak among us to take up so much of our oxygen? Instead of improving civilization, we are stunting it simply to help those who don't have the ability or desire to be a functioning part of society.

In school, we sequestered the retards and pinheads to their own rooms away from those of us who can contribute to society, because we didn't want them to slow down our success. The same should be done with these bums who have to wait in line for free healthcare. Tens of thousands are dying, because they can't afford a $1000 plane ticket and a credit card to put their health costs on in the U.S. Why should those successful Brits have to help pay for them to sit around and die?


Well, I figured you thought that way. After all, you're a fan of Planned Parenthood, which was founded based on Eugenics, specifically the control of the black population.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT