Georgia and Wisconsin already had photo ID laws, trump and the trumpers have challenged both states with no evidence being presented. Arizona has an ID law, they are challenged. This whole big lie was concocted by trump and his traitorous band of miscreants to try to hang on to power when the vast majority of Americans wanted his ass as far from DC as we could get him!!
People died, sustain injuries and going to jail because they were wound up about those stupid, stupid, stupid "Stop the Steal" lies. Incredible that nonsense continues to be spouted.
apnews.com
No, to continue to yammer about it when there’s absolutely zero evidence of any widespread fraud in this past election is what is ****ing disingenuous.
www.heritage.org
blogs.lse.ac.uk
www.politico.com
Look rain man, no one has ever denied there is election fraud that takes place, no one! What you don't seem to grasp is that its been proven time and time again to be on a small scale. trump had an investigation launched after the 2016 election and finally shut it down when nothing of substance was being found, yet you numbskulls keep harping about it. Even your article by the conservative group ID'ed only 1334 cases that were proven, and that goes back to the mid 90's, over 20 years worth of investigations!!! Im not sure why you can't understand that!🥱 It's a two-way street that was paved well before 2020. Any intelligent person should be able to see that. Sorry you can't...
Many Democrats think that the 2016 election result was rigged
Previous studies have found that after an election, supporters of the losing candidate tend to be more likely to believe that votes were counted improperly. So how did Donald Trump’s claims t…
What Happened to the Democrats Who Never Accepted Bush’s Election
The 2004 vote-fraud conspiracy movement never really died. What does that mean for Trump’s true believers—and America?
Hillary Clinton Maintains 2016 Election ‘Was Not On the Level’: ‘We Still Don’t Know What Really Happened’
Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear."There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level," Clinton said during an interview...news.yahoo.com
The discussion point: was there enough election fraud to change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election? Nope.
Vast majority of Americans would be in the 200 million plus number. SO, that many don't even vote to start with.
OK, the vast majority of voting Americans, is that better? The rest of that is gibberish from your imagination. You could be a hype man for trump lol
Here's another interesting take....1334 proven instances over 39 years. 30 instances since the 2020 election out of 155,000,000 votes.Here is an interesting take on election fraud. The Heritage Foundation, though right-leaning, compiled this regarding recent examples of election fraud. They did not "cherry-pick" examples of Democrats doing it. In fact, like most crime "reporting" it only seems the race, er, political affiliation is mentioned when Republicans are doing it...
Voter Fraud Map: Election Fraud Database | The Heritage Foundation
Explore a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. The database is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed.
They have done it for years. That was the big fight in GA and Stacey Abrams whining during that governor race. They cleaned up the books on her.
IF they have done it for years and to the degree you trumpsters seem to think, then there must be all sorts of evidence of wide spread fraud, so why has it not been exposed? Ive got no problem with voting laws, as long as they are equitable to all.
Because they do it in places, the large cities mentioned, and they have the power and control. What are they going to do? Turn themselves in? If you don't have a clos election, most aren't going to check or it is not necessary. That one pollster(can't remember but he is good one and would have to look up his name) said that PA would be tough to call because he knew they were going to do what they do in Philadelphia. He said he though Trump would have to win by clear double digits to over come it. Again, watch the news. It is always the same places they extend deadline, can't get the votes counted, will resume tomorrow. etc.
This inner-city tripe is tiresome and ignores the facts.
www.inquirer.com
Remember, this is the guy that started a thread saying he wasn’t a partisan hack.
Hence why I say large metro areas. The Philadelphia area is a know cheating hotbed period. Same for metro Atlanta. Again that is why Dems were so pissed when Abrams was running down there at Kemp. When he was Sec of State he cleaned up the voter books, Got rid of the dead people and such. They spend time filling thousands of ballots out for people. Period.This inner-city tripe is tiresome and ignores the facts.
Trump lost Philly and PA in the suburbs surrounding Philly where educated folks - a good part of them female - voted against Trump. Trump won those counties by 44K votes 2016. Biden won those counties by 80K votes.
America didn't want Trump to get a 2nd term....it's really time "the collective" wraps its head around that fact.
The Philadelphia suburbs were the key to Joe Biden’s Pennsylvania victory. Here are the numbers.
Biden’s victory margin was 105,000 votes better than what Hillary Clinton amassed in 2016. That was more than enough to offset the gains Trump made in smaller counties across the state.
You continue to throw things in that had nothing to do with the original discussion. It is like two people staring at a case of milk and discussing whether or not it is spoiled, then you jump in and say it tastes better if you add chocolate syrup to it... yeah, no shit!So suggesting photo ID laws improve and enhance voting integrity is deflection???
So having paper ballots scanned to record the vote quickly and accurately while keeping a paper copy as support has nothing to do with sensible solutions???
So a periodic review of voter rolls to purge them of deceased, and relocated, voters is not sensible???
Please note the opposition - it is the usual suspects...
Dead-voter bill passes over Democratic opposition
Legislation that requires swift removal of dead individuals from voter rolls has passed the Oklahoma Senate over the united opposition of Senate Democrats.www.ocpathink.org
You've got to be dead yourself to not notice the boxes of votes that seemingly appear out of nowhere whenever there is a tightly contested election.
Come now, you are the one being disingenuous and are deflecting.
Troll...you never said "large metro areas"... Good grief, your post is literally above...it says "Big Cities"
Well, that's still better than making-up unintelligible, off-the-topic BS.
Nope. I made one post in the Dow thread and no posts were deleted.
