Not in D-I. I am not saying they need to win every season, but it should happen more often than once every 20-30 years. That is just piss poor leadership. Again scholarships are given to athletes that the staff believes can help the program win not elevate their team GPA or just get kids an education. If that were the case we wouldn't spend money scouring the country and in Dan's case the eastern block of Europe to find players. Nope we'd just hand them out to kids from the local community so they could get a free education.
D-I athletics is a BIG business. If you don't like it then don't participate and don't ask people to invest. Multi-million dollar practice facilities aren't built and millions spent on nutrition and strength training just so kids can get an education.
Look at some of these schools and the "kids" they bring in. I'm sure Urban Meyer recruited Aaron Hernandez and ignored his behavior just because he wanted him to get an education. I'm sure the administration in Happy Valley turned a blind eye and covered up the Sandusky stuff just because they were so worried about players getting their degrees. I'm sure Art Briles covered up all those allegations because he was afraid some kids wouldn't be graduating if everyone found out. Those Miami Hurricane teams in the 90s and 00s were loaded with Rhodes Scholars.
Again if it wasn't about winning your head coaches shouldn't be the highest paid employees in the university let alone the entire state. Coaches make more than the school presidents. They make more than the governors. They make more than POTUS. If it's just about getting kids and education then maybe those millions being paid to athletic staff should be given to the professors instead. Remember. It's not about winning.
I respectfully dispute some of your points.
Ask Stanford, Vanderbilt, or Northwestern if they really care about winning over GPA and academic standards in the two major sports.
You think the Ivy League, if they REALLY wanted to, couldn't phone up the NCAA and demand to be FBS using their political power, and then use THEIR financial power to buy teams or enter bidding wars with the SEC and win?
Sorry, some institutions actually do have academic standards, which is why, they don't win but continue to exist.
It actually is why Northwestern, Stanford, Vanderbilt, etc., aren't better.
You really think Alabama could keep up with them if they wanted to just bring in athletes and forego the whole academics thing?
Is it piss poor leadership when the higher level of D1 stacks the deck completely against your mid major program to really win?
You are right, D1 sports is a business and business is winning...but it's also a monopoly and total politics within. 94% of the programs aren't ever going to achieve what they set out to...and for the few who can win the whole thing, and do, remind everyone else that just being in the same conversation is a win...and every now and then, that happens.