Why? Polls had Hillary winning in a landslide.
ANOTHER WHISTLE BLOWER: CROOKED TRIED TO FIX HIS IRS AUDIT
- Thread starter dherd
- Start date
Why? Polls had Hillary winning in a landslide.
Pretty much true in terms of electoral votes. Total percentages appear closer.
https://www.thewrap.com/every-poll-that-got-election-wrong-donald-trump/
https://www.thewrap.com/every-poll-that-got-election-wrong-donald-trump/
WE CAN ALL SLEEP BETTER TONIGHT FOR THE 748TH TIME CONS FIND CLINTON PERFECT (NO CHINEESE EMAIL HACK) BUT THEY KNEW THAT ALL ALONG. MAYBE THEY SHOULD USE
SOME OF MY MONEY AND THEIR TIME GETTING THE RUSSIANS OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
A long-running Republican-led investigation into the handling of classified information on Hillary Clinton's private email server did not find any evidence that China had successfully hacked the former secretary of state, confirming the findings of the FBI, according to a memo released by two senior senators this week.
The findings, from Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, respectively, should help put to rest allegations that resurfaced after a report in a conservative news outlet last year that was later perpetuated online by President Donald Trump.
"Neither the committees nor the FBI were able to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred," Grassley and Johnson said in a news release Wednesday.
Concerns of an intrusion by China into the server were first raised by two officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office, which helped initiate the original review of Clinton's email practices as secretary of state that was later referred to the FBI, according to the memo. Both officials were interviewed by the Senate investigators as part of their probe.
One of the officials told Senate investigators that Peter Strzok, a senior FBI official on the Clinton investigation who was fired last year after the release of text messages he'd sent that were critical of Trump, was "aloof and dismissive" when presented with information about the potential Chinese hack.
The other Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office official told investigators that FBI employees were "poker faced" when shown the information, which concerned the appearance of a Gmail address that had a similar name to a Chinese trucking company in the metadata of a tranche of Clinton emails.
A letter in April to Grassley and Johnson from the inspectors general for the intelligence community and the Justice Department that's included in the memo says a computer specialist who administered one of the private email systems told the FBI that he had created the Gmail account to transfer archived emails between Clinton servers.
The FBI had been aware of the Gmail account in question before the two intelligence community inspector general officials expressed their concerns over it in the meeting with Strzok, the memo shows.
After its own investigation, the FBI concluded in 2016 that there was no "direct evidence" that the server had been successfully hacked, though former FBI Director James Comey conceded that "given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence."
Separately, the officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office also told Senate investigators that they had witnessed efforts by senior State Department officials to try to avoid labeling certain emails as classified as part of the review.
The Senate investigation into the Clinton server is continuing and has shifted its focus toward a classified appendix of a report from the Department of Justice Inspector General's Office scrutinizing the FBI's investigation that was released last year, according to the memo. Investigators are interested in the decision by the FBI to not seek access to "certain highly classified information potentially relevant to the investigation" and have written to the Justice Department with questions, they said in the memo.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ked-clinton-server/ar-AAFUiA0?ocid=spartanntp
AND STILL AFTER ALL THAT 3 DAYS LATER FOX/RUSSIA NEWS CHANNEL TONIGHT DID A 20
MINUTE SEGMENT ON HOW THE CHINEESE HACKED CLINTONS EMAILS AND THE FBI AND JAMES COMEY COVERED IT UP.
GREAT JOURNALISM (FOR RUSSIA)
SOME OF MY MONEY AND THEIR TIME GETTING THE RUSSIANS OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
A long-running Republican-led investigation into the handling of classified information on Hillary Clinton's private email server did not find any evidence that China had successfully hacked the former secretary of state, confirming the findings of the FBI, according to a memo released by two senior senators this week.
The findings, from Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, respectively, should help put to rest allegations that resurfaced after a report in a conservative news outlet last year that was later perpetuated online by President Donald Trump.
"Neither the committees nor the FBI were able to confirm whether an intrusion into the server occurred," Grassley and Johnson said in a news release Wednesday.
Concerns of an intrusion by China into the server were first raised by two officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office, which helped initiate the original review of Clinton's email practices as secretary of state that was later referred to the FBI, according to the memo. Both officials were interviewed by the Senate investigators as part of their probe.
One of the officials told Senate investigators that Peter Strzok, a senior FBI official on the Clinton investigation who was fired last year after the release of text messages he'd sent that were critical of Trump, was "aloof and dismissive" when presented with information about the potential Chinese hack.
The other Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office official told investigators that FBI employees were "poker faced" when shown the information, which concerned the appearance of a Gmail address that had a similar name to a Chinese trucking company in the metadata of a tranche of Clinton emails.
A letter in April to Grassley and Johnson from the inspectors general for the intelligence community and the Justice Department that's included in the memo says a computer specialist who administered one of the private email systems told the FBI that he had created the Gmail account to transfer archived emails between Clinton servers.
The FBI had been aware of the Gmail account in question before the two intelligence community inspector general officials expressed their concerns over it in the meeting with Strzok, the memo shows.
After its own investigation, the FBI concluded in 2016 that there was no "direct evidence" that the server had been successfully hacked, though former FBI Director James Comey conceded that "given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence."
Separately, the officials from the Intelligence Community Inspector General's Office also told Senate investigators that they had witnessed efforts by senior State Department officials to try to avoid labeling certain emails as classified as part of the review.
The Senate investigation into the Clinton server is continuing and has shifted its focus toward a classified appendix of a report from the Department of Justice Inspector General's Office scrutinizing the FBI's investigation that was released last year, according to the memo. Investigators are interested in the decision by the FBI to not seek access to "certain highly classified information potentially relevant to the investigation" and have written to the Justice Department with questions, they said in the memo.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ked-clinton-server/ar-AAFUiA0?ocid=spartanntp
AND STILL AFTER ALL THAT 3 DAYS LATER FOX/RUSSIA NEWS CHANNEL TONIGHT DID A 20
MINUTE SEGMENT ON HOW THE CHINEESE HACKED CLINTONS EMAILS AND THE FBI AND JAMES COMEY COVERED IT UP.
GREAT JOURNALISM (FOR RUSSIA)
Don’t waste your breath trying to convince Trump supporters he’s repugnant
the imperial wizard said: “The reason a lot of Klan members like Donald Trump is because a lot of what he believes, we believe in.”
What he believes in, they believe in. Trump’s loyal base of supporters rejects or ignores any charge of bias. They stay locked in, because they see things his way; he is speaking for them.
So, don’t waste time trying to convince them that Trump has a dark side.
They have heard what you heard; have seen what you’ve seen. The difference: They delight in the Trump thoughts, words and deeds that you denounce.
The dark side is with them.
Trump is what he is. There’s the no small matter of all the rest.
It doesn’t bother them at all when Trump resorts to racist, sexist and religiously intolerant tropes in his onslaughts.
Face it. They helped put — and are now fighting like mad to keep — a prejudiced president in the White House. What does that say about them?
What does it say about the rest of us if we let them? Forget labeling; spend the time we have left on the political effort to rid the White House of that problem.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...883596-bf95-11e9-a5c6-1e74f7ec4a93_story.html
the imperial wizard said: “The reason a lot of Klan members like Donald Trump is because a lot of what he believes, we believe in.”
What he believes in, they believe in. Trump’s loyal base of supporters rejects or ignores any charge of bias. They stay locked in, because they see things his way; he is speaking for them.
So, don’t waste time trying to convince them that Trump has a dark side.
They have heard what you heard; have seen what you’ve seen. The difference: They delight in the Trump thoughts, words and deeds that you denounce.
The dark side is with them.
Trump is what he is. There’s the no small matter of all the rest.
It doesn’t bother them at all when Trump resorts to racist, sexist and religiously intolerant tropes in his onslaughts.
Face it. They helped put — and are now fighting like mad to keep — a prejudiced president in the White House. What does that say about them?
What does it say about the rest of us if we let them? Forget labeling; spend the time we have left on the political effort to rid the White House of that problem.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...883596-bf95-11e9-a5c6-1e74f7ec4a93_story.html
The story is that Hillary’s it guy set up a fake gmail address to archive every email sent and received by Hillary. It’s ok though because he got blanket immunity
No. Polls had her winning the popular vote by 2-3 per cent, which she did.
Last edited:
is she still yore president?
nope, like it or not, donald fvckin' trump is. breathe it in, man!
CROODED DONALD TRUMP HAS ONE PLAYBOOK AND VERY FEW PLAYS LEFT IN IT
After a week in which the threat of recession rocked global financial markets, his trade war with China showed no signs of progress and the government of Israel got into a nasty dispute with two members of Congress, President Trump went to bed Thursday night with other weighty issues on his mind.
“Great news,” he tweeted. “Tonight we broke the all-time attendance record previously held by Elton John at #SNHUArena [Southern New Hampshire University] in Manchester!”
This is the frivolous mind-set of the president of the United States. Trump’s flurry of statements over the past few days have brought into focus once again something fundamental about him: He has little understanding of what it means to govern. He would rather tweet from the bleachers.
The 800-point drop in the Dow Jones industrial index at the middle of last week and an inverted yield curve (an arcane but much-watched economic indicator) underscored why there is broad and growing concern about the direction of the economy.
Germany saw its economy contract in the last quarter and other nations’ economies appear to be slowing. The U.S. economy has been growing, and the stock market managed to regain some of the ground lost by week’s end. But given what is happening globally, how long this extended period of growth can last is a major issue for American families — and a consequential issue for Trump’s political future.
The president’s trade war with China has contributed to the problems now facing the global economy. Yet the president accepts no responsibility — for his policies, his statements or his tweets, all of which have added to the uncertainty. He has a mixed message: Everything is great, and what isn’t great is somebody else’s fault.
Trump was reduced again last week to doing what he always does when there is trouble brewing. He attacked others. He hurled more insults at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell, a Trump appointee who has become the president’s favored whipping boy. He blamed Powell for raising interest rates too high and now for not lowering them quickly or enough. “The Fed is holding us back,” he said in one tweet, which inexplicably ended with, “We will win!”
The Fed wasn’t the only institution in Trump’s sights as talk of economic problems intensified. He lashed out at another favored target: the media. “The Fake News Media is doing everything they can to crash the economy because they think that will be bad for me and my reelection,” he tweeted.
Does anyone not believe that his principal focus these days is reelection?
Under pressure, Trump backed off his threat to impose a major new round of tariffs on China on Sept. 1, moving the deadline back to Dec. 15. Analysts had warned that the new tariffs, which would hit a broad range of consumer goods, could have had a negative impact on the holiday shopping season in the United States.
The president offered an upside-down explanation. “The American consumer is fine with or without the September date, but much good will come from the short deferral to December,” he tweeted. “It actually helps China more than us, but will be reciprocated.”
The president showed the sophistication of his thinking on another China issue, the massive pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong that have rattled the Chinese leadership. “It’s a very tricky situation,” he explained to reporters. “I think it will work out and I hope it works out, for liberty. I hope it works out for everybody, including China.”
The president offered no support for the demonstrators who have been massing for weeks in protest. Nor did he warn China against taking action to put down the protests. Unlike past presidents, he declined to stand for American values or the importance of human rights. He appears unwilling to criticize the Chinese government for fear that it would jeopardize resolving the trade war. For Trump, human rights can wait.
But the president was willing to offer Chinese President Xi Jinping some advice about Hong Kong. Calling Xi “a great leader” and “a good man in a ‘tough business,’ ” he recommended: “If President Xi would meet directly and personally with the protesters, there would be a happy and enlightened ending to the Hong Kong problem,” he wrote. “I have no doubt!”
In another part of the world, Trump decided to stand with the government of Israel against two members of Congress, pressuring the Israelis to block an official visit to their country by Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).
Trump tweeted that a decision by Israel to allow Tlaib and Omar to enter the country would be showing “great weakness,” adding, “They hate Israel and all Jewish people and there is nothing that can be said or done to change their minds. . . . They are a disgrace!”
The two first-term congresswomen, who happen to be Muslim, have been highly critical of Israel and its treatment of the Palestinians. They support the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel.
But the Israeli government’s decision drew sharp criticism from Democratic lawmakers and the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who said in a tweet that he disagreed “100%” with the views of Tlaib and Omar but added, “Denying them entry into #Israel is a mistake.”
The president has tried to portray Tlaib, Omar and Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) and Ayanna Pressley (Mass.) as the face of a radical Democratic Party and targeted them with a racist tweet urging them to “go back” to where they came from, even though three were born in the United States and all are citizens.
Meanwhile, the president is talking about trying to buy Greenland, a story first reported by the Wall Street Journal. Really.
The president’s supporters still love him, as his rally in New Hampshire on Thursday again showed. The president put on quite a show, a rambling discourse that lasted more than an hour and a half and revisited old lines and familiar themes (sometimes more than once).
Former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani sent out a series of rapturous tweets about it, comparing Trump with former presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. “These are masterful performances,” he wrote in one tweet. “No one in America can excite a crowd like @realDonaldTrump. . . . This is a unique and potent political weapon.”
Meanwhile, a new Fox News poll of the 2020 campaign showed Trump losing to every Democrat tested. More telling was that the incumbent president did not break 40 percent against any of them. Polls are polls, and the election is more than a year away, but those numbers should concern the president’s advisers.
Trump is following the same limited playbook that got him to the presidency. Whether those tactics have the same potency they once did is the question that will determine his and the country’s future. Meanwhile, serious problems are in front of him and he is struggling to find the answers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ad7738-c062-11e9-b873-63ace636af08_story.html
After a week in which the threat of recession rocked global financial markets, his trade war with China showed no signs of progress and the government of Israel got into a nasty dispute with two members of Congress, President Trump went to bed Thursday night with other weighty issues on his mind.
“Great news,” he tweeted. “Tonight we broke the all-time attendance record previously held by Elton John at #SNHUArena [Southern New Hampshire University] in Manchester!”
This is the frivolous mind-set of the president of the United States. Trump’s flurry of statements over the past few days have brought into focus once again something fundamental about him: He has little understanding of what it means to govern. He would rather tweet from the bleachers.
The 800-point drop in the Dow Jones industrial index at the middle of last week and an inverted yield curve (an arcane but much-watched economic indicator) underscored why there is broad and growing concern about the direction of the economy.
Germany saw its economy contract in the last quarter and other nations’ economies appear to be slowing. The U.S. economy has been growing, and the stock market managed to regain some of the ground lost by week’s end. But given what is happening globally, how long this extended period of growth can last is a major issue for American families — and a consequential issue for Trump’s political future.
The president’s trade war with China has contributed to the problems now facing the global economy. Yet the president accepts no responsibility — for his policies, his statements or his tweets, all of which have added to the uncertainty. He has a mixed message: Everything is great, and what isn’t great is somebody else’s fault.
Trump was reduced again last week to doing what he always does when there is trouble brewing. He attacked others. He hurled more insults at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell, a Trump appointee who has become the president’s favored whipping boy. He blamed Powell for raising interest rates too high and now for not lowering them quickly or enough. “The Fed is holding us back,” he said in one tweet, which inexplicably ended with, “We will win!”
The Fed wasn’t the only institution in Trump’s sights as talk of economic problems intensified. He lashed out at another favored target: the media. “The Fake News Media is doing everything they can to crash the economy because they think that will be bad for me and my reelection,” he tweeted.
Does anyone not believe that his principal focus these days is reelection?
Under pressure, Trump backed off his threat to impose a major new round of tariffs on China on Sept. 1, moving the deadline back to Dec. 15. Analysts had warned that the new tariffs, which would hit a broad range of consumer goods, could have had a negative impact on the holiday shopping season in the United States.
The president offered an upside-down explanation. “The American consumer is fine with or without the September date, but much good will come from the short deferral to December,” he tweeted. “It actually helps China more than us, but will be reciprocated.”
The president showed the sophistication of his thinking on another China issue, the massive pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong that have rattled the Chinese leadership. “It’s a very tricky situation,” he explained to reporters. “I think it will work out and I hope it works out, for liberty. I hope it works out for everybody, including China.”
The president offered no support for the demonstrators who have been massing for weeks in protest. Nor did he warn China against taking action to put down the protests. Unlike past presidents, he declined to stand for American values or the importance of human rights. He appears unwilling to criticize the Chinese government for fear that it would jeopardize resolving the trade war. For Trump, human rights can wait.
But the president was willing to offer Chinese President Xi Jinping some advice about Hong Kong. Calling Xi “a great leader” and “a good man in a ‘tough business,’ ” he recommended: “If President Xi would meet directly and personally with the protesters, there would be a happy and enlightened ending to the Hong Kong problem,” he wrote. “I have no doubt!”
In another part of the world, Trump decided to stand with the government of Israel against two members of Congress, pressuring the Israelis to block an official visit to their country by Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).
Trump tweeted that a decision by Israel to allow Tlaib and Omar to enter the country would be showing “great weakness,” adding, “They hate Israel and all Jewish people and there is nothing that can be said or done to change their minds. . . . They are a disgrace!”
The two first-term congresswomen, who happen to be Muslim, have been highly critical of Israel and its treatment of the Palestinians. They support the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel.
But the Israeli government’s decision drew sharp criticism from Democratic lawmakers and the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who said in a tweet that he disagreed “100%” with the views of Tlaib and Omar but added, “Denying them entry into #Israel is a mistake.”
The president has tried to portray Tlaib, Omar and Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) and Ayanna Pressley (Mass.) as the face of a radical Democratic Party and targeted them with a racist tweet urging them to “go back” to where they came from, even though three were born in the United States and all are citizens.
Meanwhile, the president is talking about trying to buy Greenland, a story first reported by the Wall Street Journal. Really.
The president’s supporters still love him, as his rally in New Hampshire on Thursday again showed. The president put on quite a show, a rambling discourse that lasted more than an hour and a half and revisited old lines and familiar themes (sometimes more than once).
Former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani sent out a series of rapturous tweets about it, comparing Trump with former presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. “These are masterful performances,” he wrote in one tweet. “No one in America can excite a crowd like @realDonaldTrump. . . . This is a unique and potent political weapon.”
Meanwhile, a new Fox News poll of the 2020 campaign showed Trump losing to every Democrat tested. More telling was that the incumbent president did not break 40 percent against any of them. Polls are polls, and the election is more than a year away, but those numbers should concern the president’s advisers.
Trump is following the same limited playbook that got him to the presidency. Whether those tactics have the same potency they once did is the question that will determine his and the country’s future. Meanwhile, serious problems are in front of him and he is struggling to find the answers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ad7738-c062-11e9-b873-63ace636af08_story.html
In Economic Warning Signals, Trump Sees Signs of a Conspiracy
He has insisted that his own handpicked Federal Reserve chair, Jerome H. Powell, is intentionally acting against him. He has said other countries, including allies, are working to hurt American economic interests. And he has accused the news media of trying to create a recession.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/17/upshot/how-the-recession-of-2020-could-happen.html?module=inline
the president’s broadsides follow a long pattern of conspiratorial thinking. He has claimed, without evidence, that undocumented immigrants cast millions of ballots, costing him the popular vote in the 2016 election. During the campaign, he predicted that the system might prove to be “rigged” if he did not win. He conjured up a “deep state” conspiracy within the government to thwart his election and, more recently, his agenda. And he has said reporters are trying to harm him with pictures of empty seats at his rallies.
The attacks come as the economy has begun flashing some warning signs, Last week, stock markets plunged as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note briefly fell below that of the two-year Treasury note, an unusual situation known as an inversion of the yield curve that is considered one of the most reliable leading indicators of recession in the United States.
researchers at Harvard, the University of Chicago, the International Monetary Fund and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston that showed that the cost of Mr. Trump’s tariffs had “fallen largely on the U.S.,” not on China and other countries, as the administration has asserted.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/18/us/politics/trump-economy-recession.html
He has insisted that his own handpicked Federal Reserve chair, Jerome H. Powell, is intentionally acting against him. He has said other countries, including allies, are working to hurt American economic interests. And he has accused the news media of trying to create a recession.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/17/upshot/how-the-recession-of-2020-could-happen.html?module=inline
the president’s broadsides follow a long pattern of conspiratorial thinking. He has claimed, without evidence, that undocumented immigrants cast millions of ballots, costing him the popular vote in the 2016 election. During the campaign, he predicted that the system might prove to be “rigged” if he did not win. He conjured up a “deep state” conspiracy within the government to thwart his election and, more recently, his agenda. And he has said reporters are trying to harm him with pictures of empty seats at his rallies.
The attacks come as the economy has begun flashing some warning signs, Last week, stock markets plunged as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note briefly fell below that of the two-year Treasury note, an unusual situation known as an inversion of the yield curve that is considered one of the most reliable leading indicators of recession in the United States.
researchers at Harvard, the University of Chicago, the International Monetary Fund and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston that showed that the cost of Mr. Trump’s tariffs had “fallen largely on the U.S.,” not on China and other countries, as the administration has asserted.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/18/us/politics/trump-economy-recession.html
Tell that to the Chinese.
"China's economy grew at the slowest pace in 27 years, as the trade war with the United States takes a toll."
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/15/741735791/chinas-economy-falters-slowest-growth-in-nearly-3-decades
WOW THATS SOME REAL PAIN:
The second-largest economy in the world grew 6.2% in the second quarter of 2019, a drop from 6.4% in the first quarter, according to data released by the Chinese government.
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/15/741735791/chinas-economy-falters-slowest-growth-in-nearly-3-decad
ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS LEAVE WHAT OBAMA/DEMS HAD IN PLACE, BUT NO - HE HAD TO SHOW HIS ASS - AGAIN. NOW WE WILL ALL PAY. AND DONT GET ME WRONG I AM HAPPY TO SEE DITTO HEADS SUFFER, THEY ARE GETTING WHAT THEY ASKED FOR - ITS ALL THE REST OF US I CARE ABOUT.
The second-largest economy in the world grew 6.2% in the second quarter of 2019, a drop from 6.4% in the first quarter, according to data released by the Chinese government.
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/15/741735791/chinas-economy-falters-slowest-growth-in-nearly-3-decad
ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS LEAVE WHAT OBAMA/DEMS HAD IN PLACE, BUT NO - HE HAD TO SHOW HIS ASS - AGAIN. NOW WE WILL ALL PAY. AND DONT GET ME WRONG I AM HAPPY TO SEE DITTO HEADS SUFFER, THEY ARE GETTING WHAT THEY ASKED FOR - ITS ALL THE REST OF US I CARE ABOUT.
Last edited:
DO YOU HAVE A LINK TO BACK THAT UP THAT? OR IS IT JUST TYPICAL RIGHT WING B.S. WHEN THEY KNOW THEY ARE WRONG AND CAN ONLY COME UP WITH SOME GRAMMAR SCHOOL SMACK.
#HAVE YOU SEEN THE LATEST POLLS, WE HAVE SOME GREAT NEW POLLS OUT, CROOKED DONALD IS LOSING TO EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT BY HUUUUUUUUUUGE NUMBERS. GREAT POLLS, THE BEST POLLS, GREAT POLLS WITH THE BEST WORDS, AND ALL THE BEST PEOPLE.
Last edited:
TRUMP CLAIMS 15,000 OUTSIDE CLAMORING TO GET INTO HALF EMPTY H.S. GYM.
When Biden has about 9500 people turn out, let us know.TRUMP CLAIMS 15,000 OUTSIDE CLAMORING TO GET INTO HALF EMPTY H.S. GYM.
TRUMP IS LOSING HIS MIND OVER ANOTHER BAD FOX NEWS POLL
GREAT POLL NUMBERS - ANY DEMOCRAT BEATS TRUMP
Trump’s long-simmering frustration with Fox News boiled over Sunday night, after the network posted another 2020 presidential poll showing him losing to every one of the Democratic front-runners in a potential matchup.
The poll, conducted August 11–13 from a random national sample of about 1,000 registered voters, is indeed quite bad for Trump. In head-to-head matches with four leading Democrats—Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris—Trump loses in every single one. They aren’t nail-biting margins, either. Harris, though ostensibly fourth in the majority of polls, wins by 6 points, 45–39. Warren, the progressive firebrand, wins 46–39. Sanders, the progressive heavyweight, wins by 9 points (48–39), and Biden, the man that Trump allegedly worries about the most, whoops him by 12 points (50–38). Naturally for Trump, all bad news is fake news,
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/08/donald-trump-fox-news-polling
#LOSER
GREAT POLL NUMBERS - ANY DEMOCRAT BEATS TRUMP
Trump’s long-simmering frustration with Fox News boiled over Sunday night, after the network posted another 2020 presidential poll showing him losing to every one of the Democratic front-runners in a potential matchup.
The poll, conducted August 11–13 from a random national sample of about 1,000 registered voters, is indeed quite bad for Trump. In head-to-head matches with four leading Democrats—Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris—Trump loses in every single one. They aren’t nail-biting margins, either. Harris, though ostensibly fourth in the majority of polls, wins by 6 points, 45–39. Warren, the progressive firebrand, wins 46–39. Sanders, the progressive heavyweight, wins by 9 points (48–39), and Biden, the man that Trump allegedly worries about the most, whoops him by 12 points (50–38). Naturally for Trump, all bad news is fake news,
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/08/donald-trump-fox-news-polling
#LOSER
And when you can't come up with something, cons like you start linking to liberal sources such as Politico and the Seattle Times.
Sure zippy! You had great polls in 2016 too!!
Fool me once.....fool me twice....I don’t think anyone here is surprised the three stooges (Dtard, cuntry, and greed) of the board are falling for it again!! Change the channel!!
Dtard? For the love of God the Mueller knows period should make you question your sources! In the meantime thx for the laughs!!
American Families Will Pay $1,000 Per Year For Trump’s China Tariffs, JPMorgan Says
Despite repeated assurances from Trump administration officials that U.S. consumers are not bearing the brunt of its tariffs on China, a new JPMorgan analysis predicts that the average American family will shoulder $1,000 per year.
According to CNBC, the firm estimates that the administration’s newest round of tariffs ― 10% on $300 billion of Chinese goods ― will result in a $400 increase in costs per household. Roughly half of the new tariffs are due to take effect on Sept. 1 and the other half are set for Dec. 15. The Chinese tariffs already in place are expected to cost the average household $600 per year.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amer...yPb3zjM8N7-pQMcQ792fiMEmCiXXPID5CPa-4xAsDtfnd
REPUBLICAN WAR ON THE MIDDLE CLASS CONTINUES
Despite repeated assurances from Trump administration officials that U.S. consumers are not bearing the brunt of its tariffs on China, a new JPMorgan analysis predicts that the average American family will shoulder $1,000 per year.
According to CNBC, the firm estimates that the administration’s newest round of tariffs ― 10% on $300 billion of Chinese goods ― will result in a $400 increase in costs per household. Roughly half of the new tariffs are due to take effect on Sept. 1 and the other half are set for Dec. 15. The Chinese tariffs already in place are expected to cost the average household $600 per year.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amer...yPb3zjM8N7-pQMcQ792fiMEmCiXXPID5CPa-4xAsDtfnd
REPUBLICAN WAR ON THE MIDDLE CLASS CONTINUES
$1000???? That's not even $20/week.
Remember when libs claimed a $25/week in lower taxes was a joke?
n total, the impact of tariffs are predicted to effectively wipe out tax breaks from President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax overhaul, which JPMorgan estimates to be $1,300 per year.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amer...yPb3zjM8N7-pQMcQ792fiMEmCiXXPID5CPa-4xAsDtfnd
SUCKERED AGAIN DUMMIES.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amer...yPb3zjM8N7-pQMcQ792fiMEmCiXXPID5CPa-4xAsDtfnd
SUCKERED AGAIN DUMMIES.
Would you happen to know the attendance of Sanders' largest campaign rally in the previous election?
I think it is instructive to look back then to see what draws people. With Trump as sitting President, there are plenty of people who will show up just to see POTUS. I think he's a flaming asshole but if I could attend an event I could. The fact he isn't still packing the house is interesting. People want to hear something new...and he ain't selling shit that's new.
Sure, in Iowa some cornpone town will pack 1000 into the 4-H for some bullshit. Those idiots enjoy this stuff.
People notice an extra $400 bucks at Christmas. Even though they would not think twice about blowing it on fireworks or booze.
9500 in a Podunk Pa town, on a Tuesday night, when its not even a full fledged campaign season, running against no one at this point...….yep. I do find that interesting.
$600
The Chinese tariffs already in place cost the average household $600 per year.
In other words you have no real idea. Thanks for making the point.
Why would I care to know? I am the one that for years has been promoting a trade war with China (Republicans like you instead embraced free trade and sending jobs to China, you are only on board with Trump because he is bigot/asshole *take your pick* like you, Trump and his cabinet could bukkake your wife and you would cheer). I am fine with paying my share to beat John Chinaman. I am also the one that said Americans are soft and would not be willing to do what needs to be done.
