Govt can't take care of veterans properly, but people think they can take care of 300 million people. Okkkkkkk.
ANOTHER WHISTLE BLOWER: CROOKED TRIED TO FIX HIS IRS AUDIT
- Thread starter dherd
- Start date
HEY NUMB NUTS - HE WAS TRYING TO GET BACK ON GOVT RUN HEALTHCARE NOT OFF IT - YOU CLOWNS ARE INCAPABLE OF PROCESSING INFORMATION.
INVESTIGATION DEMANDED IN KAVANAOUGH GATE COVERUP AND CONSPIRACY
Democrats called Sunday for a new investigation of Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in response to a New York Times piece that revealed a new allegation of sexual assault against him and the FBI did probe previous claims during his confirmation process.
Democrats called Sunday for a new investigation of Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in response to a New York Times piece that revealed a new allegation of sexual assault against him and suggested the FBI did not thoroughly probe previous claims during his confirmation process.
They corroborated a prior claim of sexual assault against Kavanaugh, the FBI interviewed none of the potential witnesses. “During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been ‘the talk of campus.’ Our reporting suggests that it was,” Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly wrote in the Times essay.
at least seven people they interviewed had heard about the incident, including the alleged victim’s mother. the FBI “interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.” this isn’t going away if the FBI never even bothered to talk to people surrounding this woman’s allegation.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/sunday-review/brett-kavanaugh-deborah-ramirez-yale.html
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/national/democratic-candidates-demand-kavanaugh-impeachment-after-new-allegation-in-times-piece/2019/09/15/3bdc160e-d7ce-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html
Democrats called Sunday for a new investigation of Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in response to a New York Times piece that revealed a new allegation of sexual assault against him and the FBI did probe previous claims during his confirmation process.
Democrats called Sunday for a new investigation of Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in response to a New York Times piece that revealed a new allegation of sexual assault against him and suggested the FBI did not thoroughly probe previous claims during his confirmation process.
They corroborated a prior claim of sexual assault against Kavanaugh, the FBI interviewed none of the potential witnesses. “During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been ‘the talk of campus.’ Our reporting suggests that it was,” Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly wrote in the Times essay.
at least seven people they interviewed had heard about the incident, including the alleged victim’s mother. the FBI “interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.” this isn’t going away if the FBI never even bothered to talk to people surrounding this woman’s allegation.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/sunday-review/brett-kavanaugh-deborah-ramirez-yale.html
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/national/democratic-candidates-demand-kavanaugh-impeachment-after-new-allegation-in-times-piece/2019/09/15/3bdc160e-d7ce-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html
Last edited:
Redundant
A PRESIDENT PLACED INTO OFFICE BY THE RUSSIANS TAKING ORDERS DIRECTLY FROM PUTIN, NOMINATES A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CONFIRMED BECAUSE HE PERJURED HIMSELF OVER SIX DOZEN TIMES BY A SENTATE LED BY MOSCOW MITCH.
THATS SOME PARTY YOU DITTO HEADS HAVE.
THATS SOME PARTY YOU DITTO HEADS HAVE.
Is the quote function too difficult for you, stupid? It looks like you double-posted, because you don't know how to use it.
"An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party," The Times wrote in a correction. "The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article."
Tricare is administered by corporations, not the government.
There is certainly merit in the idea that regardless of the Senate’s unwillingness to remove him, the American people should understand just who this justice is, how the investigation of him was rigged and how his elevation to the Supreme Court has sullied the institution. That might figure prominently if and when a Democratic president has the chance to reshape the court.
“Americans should be appalled that GOP Senators are complicit in the cover-up of Brett M. Kavanaugh’s abuses rather than demanding all evidence be brought [to] light before confirmation.
The latest Kavanaugh revelations, as we predicted, were inevitable. The cursory and artificially restricted FBI investigation was a farce, a Kabuki dance to give Republicans cover to vote for him. When a Democratic majority in the House and a Democratic president (if they prevail in 2020) decide to waive privileges, open the investigation up to scrutiny and demand that FBI Director Christopher A. Wray testify, more and more evidence will tumble out.
The credibility, fairness and honesty of the court will be in doubt for as long as he sits on the court.
Kavanaugh’s vote shouldn’t count! And the Gorsuch seat was illegitimate, too!). The Supreme Court will continue to hemorrhage respect and legitimacy. And the pattern will continue, another institutional casualty in the Trump era.
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/16/kavanaugh-mess-we-feared/
“Americans should be appalled that GOP Senators are complicit in the cover-up of Brett M. Kavanaugh’s abuses rather than demanding all evidence be brought [to] light before confirmation.
The latest Kavanaugh revelations, as we predicted, were inevitable. The cursory and artificially restricted FBI investigation was a farce, a Kabuki dance to give Republicans cover to vote for him. When a Democratic majority in the House and a Democratic president (if they prevail in 2020) decide to waive privileges, open the investigation up to scrutiny and demand that FBI Director Christopher A. Wray testify, more and more evidence will tumble out.
The credibility, fairness and honesty of the court will be in doubt for as long as he sits on the court.
Kavanaugh’s vote shouldn’t count! And the Gorsuch seat was illegitimate, too!). The Supreme Court will continue to hemorrhage respect and legitimacy. And the pattern will continue, another institutional casualty in the Trump era.
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/16/kavanaugh-mess-we-feared/
i'll take hillary quotes for $1,000, alex
“If I lose, we all go down and that Fascist **** will have us swinging from nooses! What the **** is wrong with you idiots?”
MUST BE NICE BEING A RIGHT WING PISS ANT - JUST THROW STUFF OUT WITHOUT THAT SOMEONE ON TWITTER NO ONE HAS EVER HEARD OF (A RUSSIAN TROLL NO DOUBT) OR EVEN WORSE THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SAYS WITHOUT ANYTHING AT ALL TO BACK IT UP AND PRETEND IT = AN FBI REPORT. THEY LOVE THOSE "ALTERNATIVE FACTS" DONT THEY.
A PRESIDENT PLACED INTO OFFICE BY THE RUSSIANS TAKING ORDERS DIRECTLY FROM PUTIN, NOMINATES A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CONFIRMED BECAUSE HE PERJURED HIMSELF OVER SIX DOZEN TIMES BY A SENTATE LED BY MOSCOW MITCH.
THATS SOME PARTY YOU DITTO HEADS HAVE.
I COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF - OH WAIT - I DID SAY IT MYSELF.
A PRESIDENT PLACED INTO OFFICE BY THE RUSSIANS TAKING ORDERS DIRECTLY FROM PUTIN, NOMINATES A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CONFIRMED BECAUSE HE PERJURED HIMSELF OVER SIX DOZEN TIMES BY A SENTATE LED BY MOSCOW MITCH.
THATS SOME PARTY YOU DITTO HEADS HAVE.
I COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF - OH WAIT - I DID SAY IT MYSELF.
Give up dherd.. the only real impeachable offense is lying about getting a bj.
AIN'T IT THE TRUTH - IN N.C. WE CALL THEM THE IMMORAL MINORITY.
So the chick this supposedly happened to doesn’t recall it ever happening (shocking, I know).
So either:
A. It never happened.
B. She was way too drunk to remember anything.
C. She’s seen so many penises in her day that they all run together.
D. All of the above.
So either:
A. It never happened.
B. She was way too drunk to remember anything.
C. She’s seen so many penises in her day that they all run together.
D. All of the above.
YOU LEFT OUT P FOR PERJORIOUS PERVERT
WHICH "CHICK" ARE YOU REFERRING TO? THERE ARE AS MANY OF THEM AS CROOKED HAS SHARPIES.
BTW HE GOT ALL OF THEM SO DRUNK THEY PASSED OUT, APPARENTLY THE ONLY WAY A CONSERVATIVE CAN GET A GIRL. AND OF COURSE YOU DONT MENTION THE DOZENS OF WITNESSES.
ODD ISNT IT THAT EVERYONE IS A LIAR EXCEPT CROOKED AND HIS FELLOW RAPISTS AND TRAITORS. AND THE BAND PLAYS ON AND THE DITTO HEADS STAND AND CHEER.
WHICH "CHICK" ARE YOU REFERRING TO? THERE ARE AS MANY OF THEM AS CROOKED HAS SHARPIES.
BTW HE GOT ALL OF THEM SO DRUNK THEY PASSED OUT, APPARENTLY THE ONLY WAY A CONSERVATIVE CAN GET A GIRL. AND OF COURSE YOU DONT MENTION THE DOZENS OF WITNESSES.
ODD ISNT IT THAT EVERYONE IS A LIAR EXCEPT CROOKED AND HIS FELLOW RAPISTS AND TRAITORS. AND THE BAND PLAYS ON AND THE DITTO HEADS STAND AND CHEER.
HOUSE INVESTIGATING MOSCOW MITCH CHINK BITCH TIES TO CHICOMS
SPANNING THE GLOBE WITH CORRUPTION, KICKBACKS AND GREED AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE THE SWAMPIEST OF THE SWAPIEST!
"The Committee is examining your misstatements of fact, your actions that may have benefitted the company in which you continued to hold shares, and your compliance with ethics and financial disclosure requirements," write Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.).
“Several reports indicate that you have used your official position to benefit Foremost Group, a shipping company owned by your father and sisters that is headquartered in New York and operates a fleet that transports materials to and from China.”https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...er-familys-company/ar-AAHnLZS?ocid=spartandhp
A top Transportation official helped coordinate grant applications by McConnell’s political allies.
“Where a Cabinet secretary is doing things that are going to help her husband get reelected, that starts to rise to the level of feeling more like corruption to the average American. … I do think there are people who will see that as sort of ‘swamp behavior,’”
“When you have a spouse who’s the head of an agency and the other spouse is a leading member of Congress — and their office is referring matters to the department, and they’re flagging things from donors, from people with particular political affiliations, who are quote-unquote ‘friends’ — it raises the question of whether the office, instead of being used purely for official purposes, is being used for political purposes.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/10/mcconnell-elaine-chao-1358068
SPANNING THE GLOBE WITH CORRUPTION, KICKBACKS AND GREED AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE THE SWAMPIEST OF THE SWAPIEST!
"The Committee is examining your misstatements of fact, your actions that may have benefitted the company in which you continued to hold shares, and your compliance with ethics and financial disclosure requirements," write Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.).
“Several reports indicate that you have used your official position to benefit Foremost Group, a shipping company owned by your father and sisters that is headquartered in New York and operates a fleet that transports materials to and from China.”https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...er-familys-company/ar-AAHnLZS?ocid=spartandhp
A top Transportation official helped coordinate grant applications by McConnell’s political allies.
“Where a Cabinet secretary is doing things that are going to help her husband get reelected, that starts to rise to the level of feeling more like corruption to the average American. … I do think there are people who will see that as sort of ‘swamp behavior,’”
“When you have a spouse who’s the head of an agency and the other spouse is a leading member of Congress — and their office is referring matters to the department, and they’re flagging things from donors, from people with particular political affiliations, who are quote-unquote ‘friends’ — it raises the question of whether the office, instead of being used purely for official purposes, is being used for political purposes.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/10/mcconnell-elaine-chao-1358068
Not only is this likely the correct answer, but both her and him had some really shitty friends in college. Yeah, let's let the really drunk guy walk around with his pants down, and yeah let's stick his dick in the really drunk girl's hand. Weirdos.
No surprise yore on the guilty till proven innocent bandwagon. how'd that go last time?
The FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh turns out to be more of a sham than it seemed
N SEPTEMBER 2018, as the battle over the confirmation of Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court raged, then-Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.)struckadeal. Mr. Flake would delay confirming Mr. Kavanaugh until the FBI completed an investigation into credible allegations of sexual misconduct — but the investigation couldn’t be open-ended or last ages. Despite these caveats, both senators insisted that the inquiry must be conducted in good faith. Mr. Flakesaid, “It does no good to have an investigation that gives us more cover.” Mr. Coons declared that “the FBI needs to be allowed to pursue all reasonable investigatory steps.” GOP senators who subsequently voted to confirm Mr. Kavanaughpraised the resulting investigationfor being thorough.
Now comes additional evidence that the investigation was, in fact, far from thorough and more of a sham than it seemed at the time. Reasonable investigative steps were not pursued.
In an article adapted from their forthcoming book on the Kavanaugh controversy, two New York Times reportersrevealedthat the FBI interviewed practically no one regarding one of the allegations against Mr. Kavanaugh, in which one of his Yale classmates, Deborah Ramirez, said Mr. Kavanaugh drunkenly exposed himself to her. “During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been ‘the talk of campus.’ Our reporting suggests that it was,” the reporters wrote. They found that federal agents interviewed none of the two dozen people who Ms. Ramirez said could bolster her story and ignored an allegation of a second episode of drunken misbehavior.
This investigative shoddiness was apparently the fault not of the FBI but of Republicans looking for the cover Mr. Flake had claimed he did not want. At first, they limited the FBI to questioningonly four peopleabout two separate allegations. Agents eventually got an expansion of the number of people they could contact —they interviewed 10— but not an extension of their deadline: a mere week. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)insistedthat the Senate would vote within days. Under these pressures and limitations, the FBI interviewed few and turned in its report early.
The Senate was faced with the challenge of evaluating Mr. Kavanaugh’s credibility when he insisted the allegations against him were totally baseless and that hedid not ever get so drunk he blacked out. Corroborating witnesses for Ms. Ramirez, along with any accounts of Mr. Kavanaugh’s drinking they had to share, would have spoken directly to this question. Instead, the Senate got a woefully incomplete report. Republicans got their cover.
Overheated calls from Democrats for Mr. Kavanaugh’s impeachment, like the chillingcalls from President Trumpfor the Justice Department to strike back at accusers, are not productive. But the Justice Department Office of the Inspector General should investigate exactly what marching orders the FBI got and when, and how its agents responded
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-fbi-investigation-into-brett-kavanaugh-turns-out-to-be-more-of-a-sham-than-it-seemed/2019/09/16/9fa9e6a6-d8c4-11e9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html
/
N SEPTEMBER 2018, as the battle over the confirmation of Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court raged, then-Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.)struckadeal. Mr. Flake would delay confirming Mr. Kavanaugh until the FBI completed an investigation into credible allegations of sexual misconduct — but the investigation couldn’t be open-ended or last ages. Despite these caveats, both senators insisted that the inquiry must be conducted in good faith. Mr. Flakesaid, “It does no good to have an investigation that gives us more cover.” Mr. Coons declared that “the FBI needs to be allowed to pursue all reasonable investigatory steps.” GOP senators who subsequently voted to confirm Mr. Kavanaughpraised the resulting investigationfor being thorough.
Now comes additional evidence that the investigation was, in fact, far from thorough and more of a sham than it seemed at the time. Reasonable investigative steps were not pursued.
In an article adapted from their forthcoming book on the Kavanaugh controversy, two New York Times reportersrevealedthat the FBI interviewed practically no one regarding one of the allegations against Mr. Kavanaugh, in which one of his Yale classmates, Deborah Ramirez, said Mr. Kavanaugh drunkenly exposed himself to her. “During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been ‘the talk of campus.’ Our reporting suggests that it was,” the reporters wrote. They found that federal agents interviewed none of the two dozen people who Ms. Ramirez said could bolster her story and ignored an allegation of a second episode of drunken misbehavior.
This investigative shoddiness was apparently the fault not of the FBI but of Republicans looking for the cover Mr. Flake had claimed he did not want. At first, they limited the FBI to questioningonly four peopleabout two separate allegations. Agents eventually got an expansion of the number of people they could contact —they interviewed 10— but not an extension of their deadline: a mere week. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)insistedthat the Senate would vote within days. Under these pressures and limitations, the FBI interviewed few and turned in its report early.
The Senate was faced with the challenge of evaluating Mr. Kavanaugh’s credibility when he insisted the allegations against him were totally baseless and that hedid not ever get so drunk he blacked out. Corroborating witnesses for Ms. Ramirez, along with any accounts of Mr. Kavanaugh’s drinking they had to share, would have spoken directly to this question. Instead, the Senate got a woefully incomplete report. Republicans got their cover.
Overheated calls from Democrats for Mr. Kavanaugh’s impeachment, like the chillingcalls from President Trumpfor the Justice Department to strike back at accusers, are not productive. But the Justice Department Office of the Inspector General should investigate exactly what marching orders the FBI got and when, and how its agents responded
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-fbi-investigation-into-brett-kavanaugh-turns-out-to-be-more-of-a-sham-than-it-seemed/2019/09/16/9fa9e6a6-d8c4-11e9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html
/
CROOKED SAYS HE IS AWAITING ORDERS FROM SAUDI PRINCE
WASHINGTON — After oil installations were blown up in Saudi Arabia over the weekend, President Trump declared that the United States was “locked and loaded,” a phrase that seemed to suggest he was ready to strike back. But then he promised to wait for Saudi Arabia to tell him “under what terms we would proceed.”
His message on Twitter offered a remarkable insight into the deference Mr. Trump gives to the Saudi royal family and touched off a torrent of criticism from those who have long accused him of doing Riyadh’s bidding while sweeping Saudi violations of human rights and international norms under the rug.
It was hard to imagine him allowing NATO, or a European ally, such latitude to determine how the United States should respond. But for Mr. Trump, the Saudis have always been a special case, their economic import having often overwhelmed other considerations in his mind.
Whether, and how, to commit forces is one of the most critical decisions any American president can make, but Mr. Trump’s comment gave the impression that he was outsourcing the decision.
The fact that the other country was Saudi Arabia — a difficult ally that came under intense criticism for the killing and dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi, the dissident and Washington Post columnist — reinforced the longstanding criticism that the energy-rich kingdom buys American support.
“What struck me about that tweet was not just that it’s obviously wrong to allow Saudi Arabia to dictate our foreign policy, but that the president doesn’t seem to be aware of how submissive it makes him look to say that,” said Representative Tom Malinowski, Democrat of New Jersey and a former assistant secretary of state.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who served under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
The Saudis, Mr. Gates told the French foreign minister at the time, always want to “fight the Iranians to the last American.”
Among those who seemed to share the sentiment in the past was a New York businessman and television entertainer named Donald J. Trump.
“Saudi Arabia should fight their own wars, which they won’t, or pay us an absolute fortune to protect them and their great wealth-$ trillion!” he tweeted in 2014.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/16/us/politics/trump-saudi-tweet.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
AMAZING WHAT A COUPLE OF MILLION $$$$$ INTO CROOKEDS POCKET CAN DO. AMAZING, BUT NOT SURPRISING!
WASHINGTON — After oil installations were blown up in Saudi Arabia over the weekend, President Trump declared that the United States was “locked and loaded,” a phrase that seemed to suggest he was ready to strike back. But then he promised to wait for Saudi Arabia to tell him “under what terms we would proceed.”
His message on Twitter offered a remarkable insight into the deference Mr. Trump gives to the Saudi royal family and touched off a torrent of criticism from those who have long accused him of doing Riyadh’s bidding while sweeping Saudi violations of human rights and international norms under the rug.
It was hard to imagine him allowing NATO, or a European ally, such latitude to determine how the United States should respond. But for Mr. Trump, the Saudis have always been a special case, their economic import having often overwhelmed other considerations in his mind.
Whether, and how, to commit forces is one of the most critical decisions any American president can make, but Mr. Trump’s comment gave the impression that he was outsourcing the decision.
The fact that the other country was Saudi Arabia — a difficult ally that came under intense criticism for the killing and dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi, the dissident and Washington Post columnist — reinforced the longstanding criticism that the energy-rich kingdom buys American support.
“What struck me about that tweet was not just that it’s obviously wrong to allow Saudi Arabia to dictate our foreign policy, but that the president doesn’t seem to be aware of how submissive it makes him look to say that,” said Representative Tom Malinowski, Democrat of New Jersey and a former assistant secretary of state.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who served under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
The Saudis, Mr. Gates told the French foreign minister at the time, always want to “fight the Iranians to the last American.”
Among those who seemed to share the sentiment in the past was a New York businessman and television entertainer named Donald J. Trump.
“Saudi Arabia should fight their own wars, which they won’t, or pay us an absolute fortune to protect them and their great wealth-$ trillion!” he tweeted in 2014.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/16/us/politics/trump-saudi-tweet.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
AMAZING WHAT A COUPLE OF MILLION $$$$$ INTO CROOKEDS POCKET CAN DO. AMAZING, BUT NOT SURPRISING!
REALLY? WHICH OF THE 37 HOUSE AND SENATE REPUBLICAN INVESTIGATIONS OF CLINTON DO YOU THINK WAS A SHAM?. BECAUSE NONE OF THEM FOUND A SINGLE THING WRONG. UNLIKE CROOKED WHO FINDING ONE OF HIS SCANDALS AND BRIBES IS LIKE FINDING WATER IN THE OCEAN.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigation_into_the_2012_Benghazi_attack
AND THIS IS ONLY ONE OF DOZENS OF INVESTIGATIVE TOPICS ALL OF WHICH FOUND 0 WRONG DOING.
YOU REALLY NEED TO STOP LISTENING TO THE WORLDS BIGGEST LIARS CROOKED AND HIS PROPAGANDA NETWORKS.
AND SHE DID NOTHING WRONG AND THE SERVER WAS NOT HACKED. HELLS FIRE THE RUSSIANS DONT NEED TO HACK ANY INFORMATION WITH TRUMP - HE JUST TELLS THEM ANYTHING THEY WANT TO KNOW.
WARREN DRAWS OVER 200,000 AT NYC RALLY
She spoke near the site of theTriangle shirtwaist factory fireof 1911, which killed 146garmentworkers, most of them women. The fire spurred a push to improve workplace safety, which Ms. Warren harnessed as a parallel for the far-reaching change she wants to pursue as president.
She spoke near the site of theTriangle shirtwaist factory fireof 1911, which killed 146garmentworkers, most of them women. The fire spurred a push to improve workplace safety, which Ms. Warren harnessed as a parallel for the far-reaching change she wants to pursue as president.
Did you even read what I wrote? I said HE too was taken advantage of. This story sounds like both were the butt of a very sick joke. Jesus Christ, you have finally pickled your brain.
