ADVERTISEMENT

Biggest Witch Hunt I have ever seen

presented no evidence

This is perhaps the dumbest thing that idiotic people keep saying. Do you realize this is not a criminal proceeding and no one is required to present "evidence"? Least of all an alleged victim, who would never present evidence in a criminal trial anyway? Do you think this is Law and Order:SVU and someone is going to present a rape kit and DNA?
 
Last edited:
This is perhaps the dumbest thing that idiotic people keep saying. Do you realize this is not a criminal proceeding and no one is required to present "evidence"? Least of all an alleged victim, who would never present evidence in a criminal trial anyway? Do you think this is Law and Order:SVU and someone is going to present a rape kit and DNA?
what the holy fvck is the point of all of this, then? i'm certain some mothafvcka better have some sort of evidence if they're going to attempt to fvck your career in the ass.
 
This is perhaps the dumbest thing that idiotic people keep saying. Do you realize this is not a criminal proceeding and no one is required to present "evidence"? Least of all an alleged victim, who would never present evidence in criminal trial anyway? Do you think this is Law and Order:SVU and someone is going to present a rape kit and DNA?
We're talking about sexual assault. Just the mere accusation is enough to ruin a man's life. So, yeah, evidence is pretty important.
 
what the holy fvck is the point of all of this, then?

I dunno, that confirming a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America, and making sure the nominee is not an idiot or a piece of shit, is really important?

For either side, this ain't no fvcking game and shouldn't be treated as one. I do not care which one is telling the truth from a win or lose standpoint. United States Senator isn't Elkins Dog Catcher...hopefully folks that can make a wise decision have been elected, because that is what the Founders trusted them to be.
 
So since this kind of accusation (years later, he said/she said etc) can never have evidence, she should just have kept her mouth shut. Got it.
I never said that (got that?). I fully support anybody having the ability to bring an accusation if they feel like they've been wronged. But because of the ramifications of such an accusation, to ruin a man's life and career there should at least some corroborating evidence.
 
I never said that (got that?). I fully support anybody having the ability to bring an accusation if they feel like they've been wronged. But because of the ramifications of such an accusation, to ruin a man's life and career there should at least some corroborating evidence.

How are you going to corroborate something like this? Seriously. I don't see a way to do so. So the only other option by your logic is to say nothing.
 
How are you going to corroborate something like this? Seriously.

Someone so traumatized at such an occurrence would have told someone about it happening. (she thought she was going to die, remember????) Another friend/girlfriend even....

If you thought you were going to die... I bet even you could remember the time of year and place the incident occurred.
 
How are you going to corroborate something like this? Seriously. I don't see a way to do so. So the only other option by your logic is to say nothing.
That's my point though - everyone knows the real end game is just denying Trump a pick. And the tactic is to run with accusations they know simply can't be corroborated because there's no way for him to clear himself.

I'm sitting here watching Senators ask a Supreme Court nominee who, over decades, has gone through a crazy amount of FBI, ABA background checks, & media scrutiny - including a $1,000,000.00 offer by Larry Flint for dirt specifically on sexual deviance, if he plays quarters.
 
How are you going to corroborate something like this? Seriously. I don't see a way to do so. So the only other option by your logic is to say nothing.
Someone at least putting them together at a party would help. So far no one backs up her claim of them ever being together.
 
This is perhaps the dumbest thing that idiotic people keep saying. Do you realize this is not a criminal proceeding and no one is required to present "evidence"? Least of all an alleged victim, who would never present evidence in a criminal trial anyway? Do you think this is Law and Order:SVU and someone is going to present a rape kit and DNA?
Never said it was. My point was her story has holes in it. A lot of them.
 
Someone so traumatized at such an occurrence would have told someone about it happening. (she thought she was going to die, remember????) Another friend/girlfriend even....
.

What do you suggest accounts for her therapist's notes from many years ago? Did she somehow plan that her high school acquaintance would end up being a Supreme Court nominee, so she planned it out six years ahead of time just in case?
 
What do you suggest accounts for her therapist's notes from many years ago? Did she somehow plan that her high school acquaintance would end up being a Supreme Court nominee, so she planned it out six years ahead of time just in case?

Where in the therapists notes did she name Kavanaugh?
 
Someone so traumatized at such an occurrence would have told someone about it happening. (she thought she was going to die, remember????) Another friend/girlfriend even....

If you thought you were going to die... I bet even you could remember the time of year and place the incident occurred.

You should know many sexual assault victims tell no one...to the point that's actually normal.

Beyond that, I get it...in contrast to my big mouth on here, I am actually a pretty private person (probably has something to do with being an only child), and most intimate details of my life I have never told a soul.

But beyond that, the one time in my life I really was concerned I would die I was pretty much black-out drunk....and while I could tell you the place, I could not tell you what time of year it was besides it wasn't summer. I have no doubt this girl was hammered, too.
 
I'm sitting here watching Senators ask a Supreme Court nominee who, over decades, has gone through a crazy amount of FBI, ABA background checks, & media scrutiny - including a $1,000,000.00 offer by Larry Flint for dirt specifically on sexual deviance, if he plays quarters.

That should tell you our government is dysfunctional. It doesn't mean he didn't he didn't get out of line with this girl.
 
I dunno, that confirming a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America, and making sure the nominee is not an idiot or a piece of shit, is really important?

For either side, this ain't no fvcking game and shouldn't be treated as one. I do not care which one is telling the truth from a win or lose standpoint. United States Senator isn't Elkins Dog Catcher...hopefully folks that can make a wise decision have been elected, because that is what the Founders trusted them to be.
U mean like the multiple times he's ALREADY GONE THROUGH THIS SHIT? Surely ure smart enough to realize at this point this had been nothing more than a delay tactic by your leftward liberal mentality deranged pieces of shit.

you're post is wrong, but you know that. this IS a game for the left and u fvcking fuktup libs goddamn well know it. it's a game of fvck everybody's life up in the way so long as the cacksuckers from hell on the left get to delay this appointment until after the mids.

frankly, it's sickening.
 
I dunno, that confirming a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America, and making sure the nominee is not an idiot or a piece of shit, is really important?

For either side, this ain't no fvcking game and shouldn't be treated as one. I do not care which one is telling the truth from a win or lose standpoint. United States Senator isn't Elkins Dog Catcher...hopefully folks that can make a wise decision have been elected, because that is what the Founders trusted them to be.
Are you so stupid you don’t realize the left made it a game
 
How are you going to corroborate something like this? Seriously. I don't see a way to do so. So the only other option by your logic is to say nothing.
Some witnesses that remembered the same thing she did would have been a start.
 
U mean like the multiple times he's ALREADY GONE THROUGH THIS SHIT? Surely ure smart enough to realize at this point this had been nothing more than a delay tactic by your leftward liberal mentality deranged pieces of shit.

you're post is wrong, but you know that. this IS a game for the left and u fvcking fuktup libs goddamn well know it. it's a game of fvck everybody's life up in the way so long as the cacksuckers from hell on the left get to delay this appointment until after the mids.

frankly, it's sickening.

He's gone through being accused of some poor behavior multiple times? Shit, he shouldn't have made it this far.

I'm going to vote straight Dem this time just because you assume I am "a lib". Not really.

But let me ask you this: is there no game being played by the GOP to be hellbent on a vote before the midterms?
 
I assume most high school kids don't attempt to screw a girl in front of a crowd...much less assault one (or what we today consider assault).
Insert wtf gif. Response makes zero sense.

He's gone through being accused of some poor behavior multiple times? Shit, he shouldn't have made it this far.

I'm going to vote straight Dem this time just because you assume I am "a lib". Not really.

But let me ask you this: is there no game being played by the GOP to be hellbent on a vote before the midterms?
Been through the vetting process....but u knew what I was referring to. Just as well make a joke when ure argument is shit and u know it though.

U are a lib. Ure the only one who hasn't figured it out yet.

Show me the game the GOP is playing. Show me whose life they're fvcking up in the process. If it wasn't for this bullshit game the left is playing are we even having this conversation?
 
Again, how is she required to present evidence? Do you really not understand what was the purpose of today's hearing?
Everyone does - to ruin the life and career of a qualified candidate, cause his kids a crazy amount of grief, grandstand for a 2020 run, & try to prevent Trump from getting another SCOTUS pick.
 
Again, how is she required to present evidence? Do you really not understand what was the purpose of today's hearing?
I do understand what the purpose. The purpose is to see if he there is merit for him to be voted on to be a Supreme Court Justice.

But, if some woman is going to come forward to try to discredit that there surely don't you think the panel is listening to the facts! So, there is no evidence so how can they not move on in their judgement?????? That is my point. I know it is not a trial. But, if you are going to bring accusations then you need proof if it is going to discredit a man's character and remove the possibility of being a judge. They have to come to a conclusion. Without evidence how can they say he freakin' did it?
 
So since this kind of accusation (years later, he said/she said etc) can never have evidence, she should just have kept her mouth shut. Got it.

That's exactly what I think. It's been 36 (maybe 35, maybe 37, she can't remember) years. She apparently never told anyone, it has apparently not hindered her professional or personal development (even if it really did happen), no one she says was there confirms it, her best friend knew nothing of it, she claims one person can confirm it, but she won't give their name.

Statute of Limitations exist for very good reasons. The brain is an amazing thing. You don't actually remember everything that happens in your life. Your brain can catalogue bullet points, then when you try to retell an old story your brain pulls up those bullet points and fleshes out the details. The problem is that those details may, or more likely, may not be accurate.

Go talk to a bunch of friends you had in high school about something that happened when you were all together. Have everyone write down exactly how they remember it happening, who was there, who drove to the place, etc. You will get the same basic main points but the detail will be all over the board. Some people won't remember some of the others being there, others will put people there that weren't. You'll disagree on who did what, but almost everyone will be sure their recollection is correct.

If you don't bring the accusation within a reasonable time frame, or if it falls beyond the statute of limitations, keep your mouth shut and go on with your life.
 
Again, how is she required to present evidence? Do you really not understand what was the purpose of today's hearing?
These guys really don’t understand. They think this is a criminal trial. This is all about convincing 3-4 senators they should hold their nose and vote for this guy. That’s it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
That's exactly what I think. It's been 36 (maybe 35, maybe 37, she can't remember) years. She apparently never told anyone, it has apparently not hindered her professional or personal development (even if it really did happen), no one she says was there confirms it, her best friend knew nothing of it, she claims one person can confirm it, but she won't give their name.

Statute of Limitations exist for very good reasons. The brain is an amazing thing. You don't actually remember everything that happens in your life. Your brain can catalogue bullet points, then when you try to retell an old story your brain pulls up those bullet points and fleshes out the details. The problem is that those details may, or more likely, may not be accurate.

Go talk to a bunch of friends you had in high school about something that happened when you were all together. Have everyone write down exactly how they remember it happening, who was there, who drove to the place, etc. You will get the same basic main points but the detail will be all over the board. Some people won't remember some of the others being there, others will put people there that weren't. You'll disagree on who did what, but almost everyone will be sure their recollection is correct.

If you don't bring the accusation within a reasonable time frame, or if it falls beyond the statute of limitations, keep your mouth shut and go on with your life.
The brain is pretty amazing I bet you wish you had one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: countryroads89
Statute of Limitations exist for very good reasons. The brain is an amazing thing. You don't actually remember everything that happens in your life. Your brain can catalogue bullet points, then when you try to retell an old story your brain pulls up those bullet points and fleshes out the details. The problem is that those details may, or more likely, may not be accurate.

Please tell me that Tier Three gave you this explanation.

Statute of limitations exist not for the reasons you listed. Christ. I'd tell you to stick to numbers, but we've seen how that works out for you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT