Quick note - 5-19 is just a little better than 20%, not 25%.
This is actually the third game in a row that we have went into a shell in the second half. The good news is that we are 3-0 in those games. The bad news is that it is only a matter of time before this style costs us a game we should win. The positive results in these games is only going to reinforce to Doc that it is the right thing to do. I spoke to a former Marshall player after the game (Donnan era) and his simple comment was that "I guarantee we would have played to put the game away".
At this point I'm not sure Legg is the guy to blame. He calls plays that accomplish the strategy of the head coach. If Doc, after watching the first half, is fully convinced that the opposition can't score enough points in the second half to beat us, his directions to Legg could simply be "let's focus on running clock and getting out of here". It will eventually catch up with him.
The thing that made yesterday so boring was that we consistently, for the entire game, snapped the ball very deep into the play clock, so we were running about 3 plays every two minutes. I was just sitting there thinking - remember when the staff used to run more players per game than anyone in college football? How does a staff go to such extremes in a 4-5 year period? It tells me that we really don't have a philosophy on what we want to be.
I would have preferred hearing from a Pruett era player....I seem to recall Donnan blowing a few second halfs in big games...Boise comes to mind.....YSU?