Victim shaming at it’s finest. Coming from the only person with a vagina on the board.
Democrats Say It is Too Soon to Testify
- Thread starter wvkeeper(HN)
- Start date
Looks like I was fooled by the Vast Right-wing Conspiracy. I just read his mother actually ruled they got to keep the house. Fake news, motherfvckers. Go figure. Typical Russian propaganda.
And here is a conservative source on it:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...other-didnt-foreclose-on-his-accusers-parents
Really???
From the article, "Ford is a registered Democrat who has made small political contributions to Democratic organizations."
She is also a professor at a college in California. If that doesn't scream raging lib, I'm not sure what to tell you.
I like how libs called all of Bill Clinton's sexual assault and rape accusers scorned women - even though most of their accounts could be corroborated - but they think Ford is 100% truthful. Classic lib logic.
Okay Random on that point the source I saw it on has now recanted. On that point I will as well.
Accuser won’t respond back to requests to testify. I’m sorry if this is a big deal and Dems truly want to get to the bottom of it then why not respond to invitation to testify.
According to the Post, she also can't recall whose home it occurred in. There are smaller details that I wouldn't expect someone to remember if it did happen, but the place where it happened is a huge detail not to be able to recall.
It's clear the dems know their handling of this looks bad.
It's clear the dems know their handling of this looks bad.
So, in 2012, 6 years ago, she sat down with her therapist and named Kavanaugh knowing 6 years later he would be named as a SCOTUS nominee?
Damn, she's good!!!!
She also had the balls to name one of his friends being present, to potentially refute her story?
That's ballsy!!!
She didn’t name Kavanaugh according to the doctors notes
She did name Kavanaugh 6 years ago. Here's a link...I even used Fox News.
Damn, she's good!!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ccused-brett-kavanaugh-sexual-misconduct.html
Mark Judge has announced he will not testify under oath.
Weird!
What do you say, right wingers? Have an explanation for that?
Weird!
What do you say, right wingers? Have an explanation for that?
He’s offered a statement saying he doesn’t recall the party or the incident. And he vouched for Kavanaugh as character. What else is there to say in a he said he said she said allegation
Some people still believe lying under oath is a crime.
Last edited:
Did you actually read this?
Her husband claims she named "Kavanaugh". She did not name him in 2012.
"He said he remembered his wife specifically using Kavanaugh’s name. She said during the session, Russell Ford recalled, she was scared he would one day be nominated to the Supreme Court."
Are you f’ucking retarded? Do you have some sort of learning disability? Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Can you not grasp the meaning of words? Do you have brain damage? Do you take drugs that impair your ability to carry on a meaningful conversation?
No SHE didn't. Her husband seemed to think for her.
"He said he remembered his wife specifically using Kavanaugh’s name. She said during the session, Russell Ford recalled, she was scared he would one day be nominated to the Supreme Court."
“His wife used Kavanaugh’s name.”
Which part are you struggling with? She named him. Six years ago.
Goooooooodddddddd daaaaaammmmnnnn you’re an idiot!
Pisses you off I quoted right out of your article doesn't it?
Hilarious. Just say it loser. "HER HUSBAND SAYS SHE SAID IT."
You might want to go find another link that actually supports your claim. Because according to the therapists notes, "Kavanaugh" wasn't specifically named in the session. I'm going with the therapist on this one.
Why don't you actually read the one you provided.
Ford provided a copy of the therapist’s notes to The Washington Post, which detailed her recollection of being assaulted by young men “from an elitist boys’ school” who would become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”
No. What pisses me off is how someone could actually be as stupid as you are. It’s incomprehensible. You said she didn’t name him and I posted the article, which clearly showed, at least to anyone with the intelligence above a monkey, that she named him six years ago.
Her husband now (conveniently) claims she named him based on a fear that "she thought he would be on the supreme Ct one day". No one else seems to have been told this by her. Including her therapists..
Were you not mocking her intelligence and ability to predict such an occurrence too?
Damn, I really have to break it down for you and explain to you I am mocking you and idiots like you. LMAO! Surreal.
She named him six years ago. She had no idea he would be a SCOTUS nominee six years ago. No one did. The fact that she named him six years ago and I said “damn, she’s good” means I was sarcastically implying she could know six years ahead of time and it clearly pointed out your stupidity and your inability to use basic logic by you jumping to the conclusion she is making the story up to simply block his nomination.
Just stop already. You really have no clue how stupid you look.
And I'm suggesting she didn't actually name him six years ago as her husband claims. That this accusation against Kavanaugh is about as truthful as a Russian dossier.
Evidently (according to her husband) she was actually thinking he would be on the supreme ct. that why she supposedly named him 6 years ago. (Of course she didn't really)
Dems only play the "woman" card for votes. Ellison is a good example. Bill is another.
Similar threads
