ADVERTISEMENT

Dherdbucky leaving the board for another 6 months

Oh did he say Trumps not involved?

I’m keeping it simple for you moron.
Almost a year of “mueller knows” from idiots like you and yet...he’s (Trump) not even being investigated criminally.

This is priceless. “Mueller knows” alright. The article could have been titled “nothing here....time to move on”.

Frankly. A better headline would have been “Mueller admits that if he keeps investigating, he’ll have to admit the DNC-Clinton was more involved with Russians than Trump”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
I’m keeping it simple for you moron.
Almost a year of “mueller knows” from idiots like you and yet...he’s (Trump) not even being investigated criminally.

This is priceless. “Mueller knows” alright. The article could have been titled “nothing here....time to move on”.

Frankly. A better headline would have been “Mueller admits that if he keeps investigating, he’ll have to admit the DNC-Clinton was more involved with Russians than Trump”
Bahaha. Whatever you say. My favorite part of this is it’s all Washington post reporting which any other time is not acceptable media.
 
so far all he has found is a few things on a couple ofguys that had nothing to do with the reason the special counsel was appointed to begin with. I will not be shocked that when all of this witch hunt is over, that the pendulum will swing back to the left, and like a well thrown bowling ball knock down a bunch of guys on the left.
 
a

and neither do you. But he just said Trump isn't his target. You my friend have said that he was for probably a year now...
According to Wapo he said at this time Trump is not a criminal target. Glad you believe wapo now.
 
at what point to these liberal idiots get angry that they have been spoon fed BS for over a year? are they even smart enough to realize it? man it must suck being a useful idiot
 
  • Like
Reactions: i am herdman
I believe Wapo to answer your question. This is very clear. Trump is a subject in the investigation. These words are very clearly defined. You guys need to do some research before you go sounding off on here. This link will help you understand much more clear. I certainly don’t think being a subject to a federal investigation is a clearing in anyway. Very much the opposite.

https://www.whitecollarcrimeresourc...-and-witnesses-in-federal-investigations.html
 
at what point to these liberal idiots get angry that they have been spoon fed BS for over a year? are they even smart enough to realize it? man it must suck being a useful idiot

I’m very pleased with the investigation so far. Manafort indicted on numerous counts, Flynn pleaded guilty, Gates pleaded guilty, Papadopoulos pleaded guilty, Pinedo pleaded guilty, van der Zwaan pleaded guilty, 13 Russians indicted, we found out Trump Jr and Kushner met with Russians in trump tower....

#somuchwinning
 
I’m keeping it simple for you moron.
Almost a year of “mueller knows” from idiots like you and yet...he’s (Trump) not even being investigated criminally.

This is priceless. “Mueller knows” alright. The article could have been titled “nothing here....time to move on”.

Frankly. A better headline would have been “Mueller admits that if he keeps investigating, he’ll have to admit the DNC-Clinton was more involved with Russians than Trump”

“Mueller knows.....Trump’s not involved”.....

Bahahahahaha. Keep’m coming bucky.
I love the poorly educated. Keep em coming Raleigh. I can wait till you get off from Tudors today.
 
I’m very pleased with the investigation so far. Manafort indicted on numerous counts, Flynn pleaded guilty, Gates pleaded guilty, Papadopoulos pleaded guilty, Pinedo pleaded guilty, van der Zwaan pleaded guilty, 13 Russians indicted, we found out Trump Jr and Kushner met with Russians in trump tower....

#somuchwinning

What’s he supposed to say? “It’s going horribly, I still can’t find shit on Trump. “
 
at what point to these liberal idiots get angry that they have been spoon fed BS for over a year? are they even smart enough to realize it? man it must suck being a useful idiot

Kind of like Trump fooling you all with promises of locking up Hillary Clinton and forcing Mexico to pay for a wall?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NutcaseConservative
Kind of like Trump fooling you all with promises of locking up Hillary Clinton and forcing Mexico to pay for a wall?

The weird thing is I don’t remember anyone on here claiming Hillary would ultimately be locked up. Unlike the bucky troll that’s been promising proof of Trumps guilt for the last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
I think it is pretty clear what he said.
.

Indeed it’s pretty clear. “Not investigating Trump on criminality”.

Months of your trolling....like all your other assertions and proclamations.....

building-implosion-10.gif
 
Indeed it’s pretty clear. “Not investigating Trump on criminality”.

Months of your trolling....like all your other assertions and proclamations.....

building-implosion-10.gif


Here is a very simple question for you: do you think no one has ever been the subject of an investigation (not a target) and ended up being charged?
 
Here is a very simple question for you: do you think no one has ever been the subject of an investigation (not a target) and ended up being charged?

In the case of a special counsel investigation?? A special counsel investigation that was charged to investigate (specifically) Trump and his campaign’s involvement with Russia/collusion?? (All of it derived from FISA warrants based on fake dossier intel paid for by the DNC candidate no less).

When you’ve got nothing to stand on...all bets are you’ll start checking punctuation or divert to semantic arguments like this one.

Seriously, how pissed are you guys that after a year of declaring the end of Trump, this is what you’ve got? You should have known the minute the media started promoting porn star narratives, the russia investigation was turning up nada.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
Kind of like Trump fooling you all with promises of locking up Hillary Clinton and forcing Mexico to pay for a wall?

Promises of locking up Hillary? have you been taking stupid pills lately? this last few months you have really digressed. And as far as Trump's wall goes....he had me at "build it", I wasn't worried about Mexico paying for it. However, I believe he did say multiple times there are other ways to have them pay for it and he isn't done with NAFTA yet. But, I'm sure being the idiot that you are, only the President of Mexico cutting a check for the wall will be paying for it to you.
 
Promises of locking up Hillary? have you been taking stupid pills lately? this last few months you have really digressed. And as far as Trump's wall goes....he had me at "build it", I wasn't worried about Mexico paying for it. However, I believe he did say multiple times there are other ways to have them pay for it and he isn't done with NAFTA yet. But, I'm sure being the idiot that you are, only the President of Mexico cutting a check for the wall will be paying for it to you.
Good stuff trumptard.
 
And as far as Trump's wall goes he had me at build it" (NO HE HAD YOU AT STUPID)
only the President of Mexico cutting a check for the wall will be paying for it to you.

NO, NOT AT ALL - WE'LL TAKE CASH AS LONG AS ITS NOT IN TRUMPS PREFERRED CURRENCY = RUBLES.
 
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS BEING INVESTIGATED FOR HIGH TREASON.AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
LET THAT SINK IN FOR A MINUTE.
 
In the case of a special counsel investigation?? A special counsel investigation that was charged to investigate (specifically) Trump and his campaign’s involvement with Russia/collusion?? (All of it derived from FISA warrants based on fake dossier intel paid for by the DNC candidate no less).

When you’ve got nothing to stand on...all bets are you’ll start checking punctuation or divert to semantic arguments like this one.

Seriously, how pissed are you guys that after a year of declaring the end of Trump, this is what you’ve got? You should have known the minute the media started promoting porn star narratives, the russia investigation was turning up nada.

I’ll take that as a No.

Thanks.
 
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS BEING INVESTIGATED FOR HIGH TREASON.AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
LET THAT SINK IN FOR A MINUTE.

And a year later - despite having an entire team of prosecutors, investigators, and unlimited funding - not one person has been charged with treason. Weird.

Either Mueller f*cking sucks at his job, or there isn't any collusion to prosecute.
 
And a year later - despite having an entire team of prosecutors, investigators, and unlimited funding - not one person has been charged with treason. Weird.

Either Mueller f*cking sucks at his job, or there isn't any collusion to prosecute.
Unlimited funding??
 
And a year later - despite having an entire team of prosecutors, investigators, and unlimited funding - not one person has been charged with treason. Weird.

Either Mueller f*cking sucks at his job, or there isn't any collusion to prosecute.

Mueller was appointed on May 17, 2017. It hasn’t been a year.

Two have been charged with Conspiracy Against the United States.

Let me guess, you think that’s no big deal.

13 Russians have been indicted, Congress voted overwhelmingly for sanctions yet the f’ucking orange clown has done nothing.
 
LIKE SOMEONE SAID ON TV TONIGHT - EVERYTIME YOU SHAKE A TREE IN THE TRUMP
FOREST A RUSSIAN FALLS OUT.

WE'VE GONE FROM TRUMP SAYING NO ONE IN HIS CAMPAIGN EVEN TALKED TO ANY RUSSIANS - TO THE MEETING WITH THE SIX RUSSIANS IN TRUMP TOWER
WAS ABOUT ADOPTIONS -
TO TRUMP SAYING HE IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION - TO NO COLUSSION, NO COLLUSION, NO COLLUSION
TO TRUMP SAYING IT IS GREAT NEWS THAT HE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR CONSPIRING WITH RUSSIA AND IN MOST PEOPLES MIND TREASON RATHER THAN BEING A TARGET - YET

HELL, I REMEMBER WHEN ALL THESE "CONSERVATIVES" RANTED AND RAVED FOR TWO YEARS BECAUSE
BILL CLINTON FIRED THE WHITE HOUSE TRAVEL OFFICE. BUT, NOW - CONSPIRING WITH OUR GREATEST
ENEMY TO SUBVERT AMERICAN DEMOCRACY AND DESTROY AMERICA IS NO BIG DEAL.
BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND - THEY ARE REPUPUBLICANS SO NOTHING IS
TO LOW DOWN FOR THEM.
 
Two have been charged with Conspiracy Against the United States.

That doesn't mean what you think it means. They were charged with conspiracy to file false reports, etc. Nothing treasonous. "Conspiracy against the U.S." is the federal catch-all conspiracy statute for any criminal act that doesn't have its own conspiracy provision within the language of the specific crime. Not anywhere near as nefarious as you are trying to allege.

For example, say you and your retarded uncle decide to transport stolen auto parts across state lines. Assuming the interstate transportation of stolen parts doesn't have its own conspiracy provision, the two of you would be charged under the exact same conspiracy statute you are citing - conspiracy against the U.S. But, of course, you wouldn't know that b/c you're an idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
That doesn't mean what you think it means. They were charged with conspiracy to file false reports, etc. Nothing treasonous. "Conspiracy against the U.S." is the federal catch-all conspiracy statute for any criminal act that doesn't have its own conspiracy provision within the language of the specific crime. Not anywhere near as nefarious as you are trying to allege.

For example, say you and your retarded uncle decide to transport stolen auto parts across state lines. Assuming the interstate transportation of stolen parts doesn't have its own conspiracy provision, the two of you would be charged under the exact same conspiracy statute you are citing - conspiracy against the U.S. But, of course, you wouldn't know that b/c you're an idiot.
Where is data supporting your claim of unlimited funding??
 
The conspiracy they were charged with was lying on the cash reporting forms. That's it. It's not as if they were charged with some type of treasonous activity.

Another example: say you and your uncle decide to print counterfeit bills in your basement. You then decide to start passing these notes by spending them at your local gas station. Your conspiracy to pass these bills would be charged under the exact same statute - 18 U.S.C. 371.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT