And this shows how big an idiot you are. The only practical difference is one person set up a private server to evade fioa requests. Why you can't differentiate that is beyond anyone with common sense
Do you think Crooked Hillary likes Obama?
- Thread starter i am herdman
- Start date
How is it a GOP witch hunt when State Depts own IG (and the FBI), did the investigation? Just because the Dems are downplaying it doesn't mean it's GOP driven.
If Powell and Rice did the same then they should be subjected to the same scrutiny as Hillary. There's a huge difference with Hillary though. She's the only one with a private server, she's the only one who lied about it over and over and over, and she's the only one running for the most powerful office in the world.
If Powell and Rice did the same then they should be subjected to the same scrutiny as Hillary. There's a huge difference with Hillary though. She's the only one with a private server, she's the only one who lied about it over and over and over, and she's the only one running for the most powerful office in the world.
From the info I read there was in fact a "practical difference" which was covered in the report as well. At the time Hillary was in charge there was more of a written/developed/solidified policy regarding classified info and emails. This was laid out in the report where they juxtaposed the Powell situation with that of Clinton.
I admittedly have not read the report, just some summaries from the AP. So I may be wrong here.
This is the EIGHTH investigation of Hillary regarding Benghazi. I'll repeat, no finding of illegal activity. None. Eighth. Moron.
Colin Powell has stated that the Hillary email investigation has been colored by her presidential run. That no illegalities have been found make the 3 secs of states practically the same.
It was the beginning of this witch hunt. Moron. Next up...investigation into Hillary's "illegal" storing of her dental records.
Ahh. Confronted with logic, Greed has once again abandoned his original argument and resorted to name-calling - as anticipated
I have abandoned nothing. You name-called in the quote above and an earlier post in this thread. Moron.
The IG's report states that Clinton's actions violated State Department policies. She also lied about getting approval.
*Witch hunt*
*Witch hunt*
"I mean, think about how things have changed since 2008," Obama said. "Back then, I was the young, tech-savvy candidate of the future. Now I'm yesterday's news and Hillary has got a server in her house. I didn't even know you could have one of those in your house. I am so far behind. Did you know that? I would have gotten one." - Obama making fun of Hillary.
Yes it was because Hillary and state said there were no emails dealing with Benghazi but they couldn't find them because she hid them in a secret server
I simply said it was an ignorant argument. I never called you a name.
Also, how can you call someone a hypocrite when the premise of your whole argument is hypocritical?
"Powell should be strung up, but Hills did nothing wrong!"
You are the epitomy of everything that is wrong with society and this country. You call people "sheep" and "trumpkins," when the truth is no one tows the party line or engages in groupthink more than you and your "progressive" ilk. The sad part is, you are too blinded by your own stupidity to see where true hypocrisy lies.
I know, I know, you're going to call me a Fox news follower and trump supporter, when both are the farthest thing from the truth.
Also, how can you call someone a hypocrite when the premise of your whole argument is hypocritical?
"Powell should be strung up, but Hills did nothing wrong!"
You are the epitomy of everything that is wrong with society and this country. You call people "sheep" and "trumpkins," when the truth is no one tows the party line or engages in groupthink more than you and your "progressive" ilk. The sad part is, you are too blinded by your own stupidity to see where true hypocrisy lies.
I know, I know, you're going to call me a Fox news follower and trump supporter, when both are the farthest thing from the truth.
You addressed me as "greed" twice. I responded with "moron", moron. I can call anyone a hypocrite that attacks hillary's email operating procedure while they at the same time defend the bush admin for going to war in iraq. I said hang powell in response to the conservatives on this board who have called for the same action to be taken against hillary. Her private email server is of no consequence whatsoever unless it is easier hacked than the government servers and has actually been hacked. Even so, the state department has been repeatedly hacked. I don't care what you watch or who you support, it doesn't prevent you from being the moron you are.
It's of consequence if it violated policy and it's of consequence that she lied about it. Hell, even Chuck Todd is calling her out on this.
The Washington Post & the NY TIMES have both started running stories about how Hillary is basically full of shit. The Post ran another one yesterday about Crooked Hillary still lying in her recent interview with Univision.
The state dept said they couldn't find them.
Not yet because FBI is STILL investigating. However the inspector general did say she was in violation of the federal records act
OUCH:
A retired senior State Department military adviser claims that Hillary Clinton’s “sloppy communications with her senior staff” when she was secretary of state may have compromised at least two counterterrorism operations.
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-email-terrorism-sloppy-communications-463605
A retired senior State Department military adviser claims that Hillary Clinton’s “sloppy communications with her senior staff” when she was secretary of state may have compromised at least two counterterrorism operations.
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-email-terrorism-sloppy-communications-463605
He notes there is "no proof" though.
This is the kind of thing that actually hurts the Hillary opposition. In my mind (though EG would disagree) there is plenty of email mismanagement to show some negligence (or at minimum arrogance/indifference for rules), so unsubstantiated claims like this make it shift from "real problem" into "witch hunt" territory.
Nothing that's coming out is surprising. In fact, it's just bolstering what those of us with a level head have been saying since the revelation of her homebrew server surfaced. The deliberate process of having & using a private server to specifically handle one government employee's data that would in all likelihood handle sensitive (or higher) information & keeping said data on the server long after she quit her position shows such an abundance of poor decision making that it literally puts lives in danger. The State Department's own IG slammed her repeatedly in their report. If this a precursor to what the FBI investigation is turning up, it could get very interesting.
Hillary has dedicated a page on her campaign site that they put up months ago to spin this debacle. Every couple of weeks I go back & read it to see how they're updating the page to respond to the continual revelations that keep coming out proving her to be a habitual liar on the matter.
Hillary has dedicated a page on her campaign site that they put up months ago to spin this debacle. Every couple of weeks I go back & read it to see how they're updating the page to respond to the continual revelations that keep coming out proving her to be a habitual liar on the matter.
True but it brings up how dangerous her practices were.
An IT guy said, under deposition, that she didn't have a password on her work computer. He also said that because she would only use her blackberry for emails that a room was built adjacent to her office so she could use it there (because her office was a SCIF). Her personal blackberry didn't meet security requirements either, so she had an unsecure mobile device in close proximity (at minimum), to a SCIF where TS planning and operations are discussed. When questioned if there were classified documents or information on her personal email system she said she only discussed TS in person or on the phone, so she stepped on her own dick right there. She had that unsecure BB with her during international business and there was a warning about it's vulnerability during a 2009 trip to China. Everyone knows that a mic, camera and GPS can be turned on remotely. Cheryl Mills once lost her BB, I think she was in NY at the time, and it contained classified emails. Her actions and give a fuk attitude toward all this is unfathomable to anyone whose ever worked with informational security. The What Ifs just keep piling up in the minds of anyone with this type of experience.
She constantly touts her time as SoS and how much she travelled during that time as the reason she's the only one ready to step into the job on day one. Now there's an asterisk behind every one of those statements.
An IT guy said, under deposition, that she didn't have a password on her work computer. He also said that because she would only use her blackberry for emails that a room was built adjacent to her office so she could use it there (because her office was a SCIF). Her personal blackberry didn't meet security requirements either, so she had an unsecure mobile device in close proximity (at minimum), to a SCIF where TS planning and operations are discussed. When questioned if there were classified documents or information on her personal email system she said she only discussed TS in person or on the phone, so she stepped on her own dick right there. She had that unsecure BB with her during international business and there was a warning about it's vulnerability during a 2009 trip to China. Everyone knows that a mic, camera and GPS can be turned on remotely. Cheryl Mills once lost her BB, I think she was in NY at the time, and it contained classified emails. Her actions and give a fuk attitude toward all this is unfathomable to anyone whose ever worked with informational security. The What Ifs just keep piling up in the minds of anyone with this type of experience.
She constantly touts her time as SoS and how much she travelled during that time as the reason she's the only one ready to step into the job on day one. Now there's an asterisk behind every one of those statements.
Pretty much exactly, Carl. We all know it wasn't handled optimally. Hillary admits that. If they're going to charge her, get it done before the convention. That way my guy becomes president. All is well.
So, to be clear, you don't care if she broke the law, as long as there were no known negative consequences?
As for it being "easier to hack," do you not understand that is exactly what all the consternation is about? That by virtue of having a private server, without the safeguards utilized by the government (which are by no means foolproof), it was, by it's very nature, more vulnerable to attack?
Again, your logic is flawed. The notion that illegality depends on consequences is not supported by the law. Hell, you can pull as much as life in prison for entering into a criminal agreement to sell drugs with someone, without ever taking steps to complete the crime. This has been upheld by the courts time and time again. The illegality of what Hills is claimed to have done does not rest on the consequences.
What law has been broken? If a law has been broken, why hasn't she been charged with it?
When did HILLARY state there were no emails dealing with benghazi? You said HILLARY.
Has she been charged with any illegal actions? Your answer is NO.
Uhhhh, you're typically not charged until an investigation is complete because the prosecution has to, you know, prove the charge(s) at trial beyond a reasonable doubt. Since the FBI's investigation is ongoing, there's no way to know if she's going to be charged.
She could be charged with violating the espionage act, but that's yet to be seen. She did violate State Dept policy. As a business owner you should well understand that there are company rules that must be followed that aren't exactly written government laws.
Let's get to the facts. No one on this board knows of any laws broken by hillary clinton. She has not been charged with any illegalities.
She could be charged with intent to commit mischief tomorrow, but that wasn't the question. What law HAS BEEN broken?
Are you having trouble understanding the question? ...........What law HAS BEEN broken?
