I told you already, she violated State Dept policy. Do you have any rules that your employees are required to follow?
Is State Department policy the same thing as a law?
I told you already, she violated State Dept policy. Do you have any rules that your employees are required to follow?
The FBI is in the process of determining that.
What law HAS BEEN broken?
How about obstruction of justice with wiping half of her emails from the server
I already answered. Now answer mine.
Because the damn FBI is still investigating you dumb fvck, it's how our system works. I've said all along she won't be charged and I still believe that but that doesn't mean a law wasn't brokenHow about why hasn't she been charged with a crime for erasing those emails?
The FBI is in the process of determining that.
Have you ever had to fire an employee? And if so, why?
How about why hasn't she been charged with a crime for erasing those emails?
Under the Federal Records Act, which is a law just to be clear, she definitely violated this provision:
http://www.archives.gov/about/laws/disposal-of-records.html#def
Because the damn FBI is still investigating you dumb fvck, it's how our system works. I've said all along she won't be charged and I still believe that but that doesn't mean a law wasn't broken
They were working full time so he fired them.
Because Obama is the leader of the Executive Branch?
So you know more about this than the IG.
By saying Clinton violated “policies,” the IG avoids concluding that she violated the law. Do you know why the IG used the word policies here? I suspect it's due to the fact that for it to be against the law, it must be PROVEN that it was done unlawfully and willfully.
Not with respect to national security. Intent does not need to be proven. You'd know that if you'd do some researchSo you know more about this than the IG.
By saying Clinton violated “policies,” the IG avoids concluding that she violated the law. Do you know why the IG used the word policies here? I suspect it's due to the fact that for it to be against the law, it must be PROVEN that it was done unlawfully and willfully.
Does the ig have the power to charge you with a crime? I would guess that an FBI investigation would trump the oig investigation. And innocent until proven guilty is only in a court of law
Do you know more than the IG?
FFS, the IG did an internal investigation regarding dept policy. IG's don't charge or prosecute individuals, they investigate misconduct, fraud, abuse... and make recommendations according to their findings. You know nothing about how this works but you're too stubborn to realize it.
Not with respect to national security. Intent does not need to be proven. You'd know that if you'd do some research
I realize the IG doesn't prosecute. I'm still waiting for you to name the law that has been broken......
And I told you it's still under investigation. According to your dumbass logic the unibomber never committed a crime because he wasn't charged for 20 years.
Well when Hillary says she created her home brew server for convenience would indicate intent. And she had classified info on her server and that would be unlawfulTo be found guilty of violating the records act, willfully and unlawfully must be proven.
Does the ig have the power to charge you with a crime? I would guess that an FBI investigation would trump the oig investigation. And innocent until proven guilty is only in a court of law
And I told you it's still under investigation. According to your dumbass logic the unibomber never committed a crime because he wasn't charged for 20 years.
Well when Hillary says she created her home brew server for convenience would indicate intent. And she had classified info on her server and that would be unlawful
According to my logic, the unabomber wasn't guilty of committing a crime until proven in a court of law.
Her own words prove she willfully set up a serverIndicating intent and proving willful and unlawful is a tad different.
Is State Department policy the same thing as a law?
Did he violate federal law prior to being charged or prosecuted?
Her own words prove she willfully set up a server
From the State Dept foreign affairs manual, 5 FAM 443.1 Principles Governing E-Mail Communications
Another important modern improvement is the ease of communication now afforded to the Department world-wide through the use of E-mail. Employees are encouraged to use E-mail because it is a cost-efficient communications tool. All employees must be aware that some of the variety of the messages being exchanged on E-mail are important to the Department and must be preserved; such messages are considered Federal records under the law. The following guidance is designed to help employees determine which of their E-mail messages must be preserved as Federal records and which may be deleted without further authorization because they are not Federal record materials.
c. Under FRA regulations (36 CFR 1222.38), principal categories of materials, including E-mail, that are to be preserved are:
records that document the formulation and execution of basic policies and decisions and the taking of necessary actions;
records that document important meetings;
records that facilitate action by agency officials and their successors in office;
records that make possible a proper scrutiny by the Congress or other duly authorized agencies of the Government; and
records that protect the financial, legal, and other rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the Governments actions.
d. For example, just like paper records, E-mail messages that may constitute Federal records include:
(1) E-mail providing key substantive comments on a draft action memorandum, if the E-mail message adds to a proper understanding of the formulation or execution of Department action;
(2) E-mail providing documentation of significant Department decisions and commitments reached orally (person to person, by telecommunications, or in conference) and not otherwise documented in Department files;
(3) E-mail conveying information of value on important Department activities, e.g. data on significant programs specially compiled by posts in response to a Department solicitation, if the E-mail message adds to a proper understanding of Department operations and responsibilities.
And he's proud of his stupidity, so blissfully ignorant he has no idea what a complete and utter moron he is. I guess that's the good thing about stupidity, you don't realize it when you are.I've been reading forums for over 20 years and extragreen has to be the dumbest MF ever. The dude is clueless in life.
And he's proud of his stupidity, so blissfully ignorant he has no idea what a complete and utter moron he is. I guess that's the good thing about stupidity, you don't realize it when you are.
It's not but hosting top secret information on said server without proper safe guards is. But then again you know that you are just being intentional ignorant as usualI haven't seen anything that says setting up a server is against the law.