Give me one good reason I should vote for one of the Democrat Circus Freaks?

[i am herdman]

Really? Why would I vote for one of those weirdos? Things are rolling along pretty good right now. And, they are weird lefto crazies. I have yet to see one compelling reason. Old Sleepy Joe is the most normal one. My choice was the gay Mayor for the Democrats. Turns out he doesn't like law enforcement like the mayor up their in NY who is a commie. Why would I want anyone of them to take more of my money and give it to illegals and support mullahs?

 

[Dreh_Nagi_HC_IM]

There are no sound reasons to vote for an Anti-American liberal Democrat.

Nobody in their right mind would vote for any of these losers.

 

[Chevy1]

3,000,000 candidates.... And you want a reason to vote for one of them. It's a little early for this.

However, credibility is a big one for some (can't speak for all). When you lie 11,000 times... You have no credibility. In other words, when you claim, "they shot down our drone in international waters." The response for most Americans is, "Yeah....right".

 

[WV-FAN]

YORE AN IDIOT!

RUSSIA!

RACIST!

MORON!

 

[raleighherdfan]

In other words, when you claim, "they shot down our drone in international waters." The response for most Americans is, "Yeah....right".

Seriously?. Even when CNN reports it was international waters?

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/25/middleeast/iran-drone-shooting-capabilities-npw-intl/index.html

 

[WV-FAN]

The response for most never-trump liberal mentally deranged non-Americans is, "Yeah....right".

FIFY

 

[Chevy1]

The initial question was, "why should I consider any dem candidates." I offered "credibility" as it concerns some of them.

The drone shoot down is an example how 11,000 lies impact credibility. An important national security event occurred where confidence in the reports was paramount. At the time it was reported, many doubted the info due to 11,000 instances where the truth wasn't told by this president. That's the point....not the actual legitimacy of of the report.

 

[Dreh_Nagi_HC_IM]

The initial question was, "why should I consider any dem candidates." I offered "credibility" as it concerns some of them.

The drone shoot down is an example how 11,000 lies impact credibility. An important national security event occurred where confidence in the reports was paramount. At the time it was reported, many doubted the info due to 11,000 instances where the truth wasn't told by this president. That's the point....not the actual legitimacy of of the report.

Take your Chevy to the levy, stupid liberal

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Ethics. Because you have ethics.

I agree, the democratic candidates at this time leave a lot to be desired. But against cheeto, there doesn’t need to be much of a quality candidate, just one who can unite the left.

Your claim that “Things are rolling along pretty good right now” simply refers to the economy, which we all know, is cyclical. Everything else is a giant cluster fvck.

 

[mlblack16.]

3,000,000 candidates.... And you want a reason to vote for one of them. It's a little early for this.

However, credibility is a big one for some (can't speak for all). When you lie 11,000 times... You have no credibility. In other words, when you claim, "they shot down our drone in international waters." The response for most Americans is, "Yeah....right".

In other words, you have no good reason. Deflecting the attention back to mean ol' Trump doesn't address anything other than your disdain for our great POTUS.

 

[Chevy1]

Take your Chevy to the levy, stupid liberal

Would drink the f'n rye if you didn't bogart it... ya drunken Trump lover.

 

[Chevy1]

In other words, you have no good reason. Deflecting the attention back to mean ol' Trump doesn't address anything other than your disdain for our great POTUS.

Merely provided a simple answer to a simple question.

Question: Why would I consider any of the Dem candidates over Trump?
Answer: There are Dem candidates who are vastly more credible.

 

[extragreen]

You can't post reasons for the conservative base to vote for someone other than cheetos while they much prefer characteristics such as constant lying, cheating, military deferments, bankruptcies, bigotry, and total ineptness.

 

[Chevy1]

You can't post reasons for the conservative base to vote for someone other than cheetos while they much prefer characteristics such as constant lying, cheating, military deferments, bankruptcies, bigotry, and total ineptness.

Through Trump, republicans have renounced fiscal and social conservatism. Hell, today, a good part don't care if Russians do mess with our elections - as long as it's on Trump's behalf of course. They've taken "selling out" to a whole new level.

40% of Republicans say Russia election meddling isn't a big deal: Survey
A Yahoo Finance/Survey Monkey poll finds 11% of Republicans say it would be appropriate for Russia to intervene in the upcoming U.S. elections on behalf of Trump and Republicans, and 29% say it would not be appropriate, but it wouldn't be a big deal.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

. My choice was the gay Mayor for the Democrats. Turns out he doesn't like law enforcement

How so? He fired the black police chief (and you know the honkeys on the force didn't care for him), and told them to stop not turning on their badgecams, which is pro-police because 99% of the time the cams exonerate the cop and show the blacks criminals in the wrong. That's the joke of badge-cams, the joke is on the BLM and Antifa losers.

Tell me what he has done that is anti-cop. Quit listening to that union leader cop on Faux. He blames the gay because he is too big of a chicken to blame the naggers. Gays are still easy picking, especially one that's already in his second term and running for a different office.

 

[mlblack16.]

Through Trump, republicans have renounced fiscal and social conservatism. Hell, today, a good part don't care if Russians do mess with our elections - as long as it's on Trump's behalf of course. They've taken "selling out" to a whole new level.

40% of Republicans say Russia election meddling isn't a big deal: Survey
A Yahoo Finance/Survey Monkey poll finds 11% of Republicans say it would be appropriate for Russia to intervene in the upcoming U.S. elections on behalf of Trump and Republicans, and 29% say it would not be appropriate, but it wouldn't be a big deal.

View embedded media

Damn, your Vag is still bleeding over the election results? Russian interference did not cause me to know Killary was a cvnt. Nobody liked her, but you guys just can't accept facts.

Hell even the flaming hot Liberal Raoul admits that everyone hated Hillary.

 

[Chevy1]

Damn, your Vag is still bleeding over the election results? Russian interference did not cause me to know Killary was a cvnt. Nobody liked her, but you guys just can't accept facts.

Hell even the flaming hot Liberal Raoul admits that everyone hated Hillary.

When did I mention Hillary? WTF does liking or hating Hillary have to do with 40% of republicans now believe it's not so terrible for Russia to interfere with our elections on Trumps behalf. Damn....I suppose this is some warped perception of "America First".

Trump Derangement Syndrome must work both ways - those who can't stand him....and the flock who can't imagine life without him. Get a grip for cryin' out loud.

 

[Chevy1]

Here's the link to the article about 40% of republicans - don't know why it didn't post with the first message - Chevy

https://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/po...n-interference-as-long-as-it-helps-their-side

 

[ThunderCat98]

credibility is a big one for some

Wait. You actually believe there are credible politicians? On either side?

 

[Chevy1]

Wait. You actually believe there are credible politicians? On either side?

Just looking for a few whose lies are in the hundreds..... instead of the tens-of-thousands.

 

[alphasig1053]

You can't post reasons for the conservative base to vote for someone other than cheetos while they much prefer characteristics such as constant lying, cheating, military deferments, bankruptcies, bigotry, and total ineptness.

Those characteristics sound like a list of your own person attributes.

 

[extragreen]

Those characteristics sound like a list of your own person attributes.

You're a lying idiot.

 

[mlblack16.]

When did I mention Hillary? WTF does liking or hating Hillary have to do with 40% of republicans now believe it's not so terrible for Russia to interfere with our elections on Trumps behalf. Damn....I suppose this is some warped perception of "America First".

Trump Derangement Syndrome must work both ways - those who can't stand him....and the flock who can't imagine life without him. Get a grip for cryin' out loud.

Um, what does Hillary have to do with it? I don't know...EVERYTHING?!

The whole premise behind liberals crying about Russian interference was that it somehow cost Cvntface the election. My point was that people hated her as a candidate, so whether or not there were Russians interfering is irrelevant. The same outcome would have and did occur.

Again, please get a fresh tampon. I think your Vag is actually bleeding that hard today. This disappointing Mueller hearing has just tipped you poor souls over the edge.

 

[Chevy1]

Um, what does Hillary have to do with it? I don't know...EVERYTHING?!

The whole premise behind liberals crying about Russian interference was that it somehow cost Cvntface the election. My point was that people hated her as a candidate, so whether or not there were Russians interfering is irrelevant. The same outcome would have and did occur.

Again, please get a fresh tampon. I think your Vag is actually bleeding that hard today. This disappointing Mueller hearing has just tipped you poor souls over the edge.

She was a terrible candidate - too many didn't want to vote for her....so they stayed home......she lost and will not run again. She plays absolutely no role in this scary shift with Republicans acceptance of Russian interference.

 

[extragreen]

. The same outcome would have and did occur.

Prove the Russian interference didn't influence the result of the election.

 

[alphasig1053]

You're a lying idiot.

And you are a cult worshipping draft dodger.

 

[ThunderCat98]

Prove the Russian interference didn't influence the result of the election.

This is perfect.^^^

 

[extragreen]

And you are a cult worshipping draft dodger.

Thanks for proving my point yet again, ya lying idiot.

 

[herdfan429]

She was a terrible candidate - too many didn't want to vote for her....so they stayed home......she lost and will not run again. She plays absolutely no role in this scary shift with Republicans acceptance of Russian interference.

The democrats knew it was happening and did NOTHING

 

[extragreen]

The democrats knew it was happening and did NOTHING

You keep saying that, idiot. But you fail to say why.

 

[mlblack16.]

Prove the Russian interference didn't influence the result of the election.

Prove that it did, fvcktard

 

[i am herdman]

You guys have not convinced me.

 

[extragreen]

Prove that it did, fvcktard

I'm not the one stating an unknown as if it was fact. You are. idiot.

 

[extragreen]

You guys have not convinced me.

You can't post reasons for the conservative base to vote for someone other than cheetos while they much prefer characteristics such as constant lying, cheating, military deferments, bankruptcies, bigotry, and total ineptness.

 

[19MU88]

Take your Chevy to the levy, stupid liberal

I remember when Chevy used to try and tell us he was in the center/moderate. Why do libs lie about who they are?

 

[raleighherdfan]

A Yahoo Finance/Survey Monkey poll finds.......

^^^Stopped reading after this.^^^

 

[Chevy1]

I remember when Chevy used to try and tell us he was in the center/moderate. Why do libs lie about who they are?

Why focus on "libs"? What do republicans stand for? Well... other than calling Democrats "socialists" and "left wing whack jobs".

Let's click through a list of traditional conservative positions to see what makes a republican - "a republican":

Fiscal Conservatism - A One Trillion Dollar budget deficit is a real problem to maintain this position. But, hey, DT says he's the "King of Debt"....and he's certainly working hard to earn that title.

Conservative social values - If our leaders are allowed to impress upon our children that lying and cheating are acceptable, then that's not "socially conservative" IMO. A big "no" in this column.

National Security - Sure we spend tons on the military and say how much we love and honor our great military men and women. But, national security is more than a big military. It's also defending our Democracy from foreign adversaries. Trump certainly has shown this isn't important to him as it concerns our elections, and bills to apply better safeguards to future elections have been blocked by a republican senate.

There is one core value that brings the party together and that's Donald Trump. Supporting Trump is the key and only issue for today's republicans. In fact, the most pathetic and weak-minded Trump republican believes anyone against Trump must be a "lib". Poor bastards...bless their hearts.

 

[Chevy1]

^^^Stopped reading after this.^^^

Don't blame you. Who would want to be associated with a political party whose members don't wholeheartedly support a clean election process.

 

[Bankerreturns]

Prove the Russian interference didn't influence the result of the election.

Prove you don't rape babies.

I know you are somewhat intellectually challenged, but even you should know that proving negatives is not possible. You can introduce inductive arguments to disprove certain elements, but never can you fully prove a negative. For example, I can say the Russians did not influence my vote, nor that of any of my associates, therefore they did not influence the result. I can say that they obviously didn't influence your vote given who you voted for and your general views, therefore they didn't influence the election, but you can always add another layer of required proof.

 

[Y.A.G Si Ye Nots]

Prove you don't rape babies.

I know you are somewhat intellectually challenged, but even you should know that proving negatives is not possible. You can introduce inductive arguments to disprove certain elements, but never can you fully prove a negative.
/QUOTE]

I was waiting for somebody to try and introduce this folk logic rule.

You can prove beyond a reasonable doubt many things that are negatives.