GK's Climate Buddies Destroy a Van Gogh Work
- Thread starter wvkeeper(HN)
- Start date
The painting is fine but yeah this style of protest doesn’t seem effective at all.
Leave these people glued to the wall, put a velvet rope around them, call it a modern performance art exhibit named “The Slow Starvation Death of Idiots”.
But not the dumbest shit you've ever typed, that's for sure
How much petroleum-derived product was used to make that disgusting, unfcukable woman's hair that color?
Never did understand this form of protest...
At least they don't harm others in the process...
personally, i prefer they just do a good old fashioned hunger strike...much less of a disturbance or disruption as they fade away.Never did understand this form of protest...
At least they don't harm others in the process...
If you've seen the physical state of the people who protest, I'd imagine death would be preferable to hunger.
I believe the fat ass girl in the video shoots that theory. Plus, she threw the tomato soup, she didn’t eat it.
Don't knock it until you try it.Never did understand this form of protest...
At least they don't harm others in the process...
It’s fire season now so you won’t be seeing that type of protest until after 4 pm.
Protesting does nothing but get on people’s nerves. It’s a pointless endeavor.
Have you read about teens protesting “cow pollution “ by going into food stores and pouring gallons of milk on the floor? Crazy.
Comparing MLK's form of protest to gluing yourself to a wall, dumping milk in stores or burning buildings during "mostly peaceful protests" isn't a strong argument.
Well, you did mention him in this thread and I wouldn't have dignified any of the current protesters by associating the two.
When you offer up an example as a counter-position I believe you are indeed comparing the two.
Similarly I could pull up this image.
Following up Xi's recent speech did those protests really accomplish anything long-term?
Likewise are these individual "true" protesters like MLK and/or Tiannaman Square or simply attention seekers?
I mentioned him a direct response to another poster that made a very broad statement.Well, you did mention him in this thread and I wouldn't have dignified any of the current protesters by associating the two.
When you offer up an example as a counter-position I believe you are indeed comparing the two.
Similarly I could pull up this image.
Following up Xi's recent speech did those protests really accomplish anything long-term?
I think when someone runs out of intelligent things to say they usually resort to the f-bomb...
So you had to go back 50 years to make that response? Couldn't think of anything more recent to counter his point?
Hmmm... was it really an ignorant question when you, along with most others, originally accepted they are protesters only to backtrack when I suggested that they are attention seekers instead?
Dipshit protestors glued themselves to the floor at the Porsche Pavilion & then started complaining no one was giving them bowls to defecate in. They further complained the facility's heating & lights were turned off in the evening/night while they were glued to the floor (something they did to themselves), which is hilarious because that's actually environmentally responsible.
